Dergiler / European Oral Research / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 2

The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study

Sayfa
74–79
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The radiographic imaging method gave similar results with micro-ct imaging.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the retreatment abilities of the ProTaper Next (PTN) and F6 SkyTaper (F6) systems by using micro-computed tomography (micro-ct), radiographic and microscopic imaging techniques.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods The root canals of twenty-six extracted mandibular premolar teeth were prepared and obturated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The radiographic imaging method gave similar results with micro-ct imaging.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Micro-computed tomography · Microscopy · ProTaper next

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the retreatment abilities of the ProTaper Next (PTN) and F6 SkyTaper (F6) systems by using micro-computed tomography (micro-ct), radiographic and microscopic imaging techniques. Materials and Methods The root canals of twenty-six extracted mandibular premolar teeth were prepared and obturated. For the retreatment procedure, the teeth were randomly divided into two equal groups according to endodontic instruments: PTN (X4) and F6 (#40/.06). Pre- and post-operative filling material volumes were measured with micro-ct, and areas were measured with radiographic and microscopic imaging techniques. The percentages of residual material were calculated, and then statistically compared. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Results There was no statistically significant difference between F6 and PTN for retreatment efficacy in the micro-ct and radiographic imaging techniques (p>0.05). PTN demonstrated better cleaning ability when evaluated by microscopic imaging. (p<0.05). The correlation was moderate between micro-ct and radiographic, and micro-ct and microscopic imaging groups; however, it was strong between radiographic and microscopic imaging methods. Conclusion The PTN and F6 files had similar effects in the removal of filling material with micro-ct evaluation. The radiographic imaging method gave similar results with micro-ct imaging.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SARİCAM, E., YUSUFOGLU, S. I., OCAK, M., GENECİ, F., CELİK, H. H. (2021). The retreatment abilities of ProTaper Next and F6 Skytaper: a micro-computed tomography study. European Oral Research, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 2, 74–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/242903

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Bergenholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, Heden G, Odesjo B, Engstrom B. Retreatment of endodontic fillings. Scand J Dent Res 1979
  2. [CrossRef] google scholar 2. Friedman S, Stabholz A. Endodontic retreatment--case selection and technique. Part 1: Criteria for case selection. J Endod 1986
  3. [CrossRef] google scholar 3. Delai D, Jardine AP, Mestieri LB, Boijink D, Fontanella VRC, Grecca FS, et al. Efficacy of a thermally treated single file compared with rotary systems in endodontic retreatment of curved canals: a micro-CT study. Clin Oral Investig 2019
  4. [CrossRef] google scholar 4. Rodig T, Wagner J, Wiegand A, Rizk M. Efficacy of the ProTaper retreatment system in removing Thermafil, GuttaCore or vertically compacted gutta-percha from curved root canals assessed by micro-CT. Int Endod J 2018
  5. [CrossRef] google scholar 5. Nevares G, de Albuquerque DS, Freire LG, Romeiro K, Fogel HM, Dos Santos M, et al. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Compared with Reciproc in Removing Obturation Material from Severely Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study. J Endod 2016
  6. [CrossRef] google scholar 6. Bago I, Suk M, Katic M, Gabric D, Anic I. Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta-percha and an epoxy resin-based sealer from straight root canals. Int Endod J 2019
  7. [CrossRef] google scholar 7. AlShwaimi E. Comparing ProFile Vortex to ProTaper Next for the efficacy of removal of root filling material: An ex vivo micro-computed tomography study. Saudi Dent J 2018
  8. [CrossRef] google scholar 8. Ozyurek T, Demiryurek EO. Efficacy of Different Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Removing Gutta-percha during Root Canal Retreatment. J Endod 2016
  9. [CrossRef] google scholar 9. Martins MP, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Kato AS, da Silveira Bueno CE. Effectiveness of the ProTaper Next and Reciproc Systems in Removing Root Canal Filling Material with Sonic or Ultrasonic Irrigation: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study. J Endod 2017
  10. [CrossRef] google scholar 10. Ozyurek T, Ozsezer-Demiryurek E. Efficacy of protaper next and protaper universal retreatment systems in removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during root canal retreatment. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017
  11. [CrossRef] google scholar 11. Donnermeyer D, Bunne C, Schafer E, Dammaschke T. Retreatability of three calcium silicate-containing sealers and one epoxy r