Dergiler / European Oral Research / 2017 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 3

ADHESIVE SYSTEM AFFECTS REPAIR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN COMPOSITE

Sayfa
25–31
Yayın Tarihi
2017-10-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

One-step self-etch adhesive showed lower bond strength values in aged composite repair (p<0.0001).Conclusion: In the repair of aged resin composite, two-step self-etch and two-step total-etch adhesives exhibited higher shear bond strength values than that of one-step self-etch adhesive.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of different adhesive systems on repair bond strength of aged resin composite.Materials and Methods: Ninety composite discs were built and half of them were subjected to thermal aging.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Data were analyzed statistically.Results: Adhesive type and aging significantly affected the repair bond strengths (p<0.0001).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:One-step self-etch adhesive showed lower bond strength values in aged composite repair (p<0.0001).Conclusion: In the repair of aged resin composite, two-step self-etch and two-step total-etch adhesives exhibited higher shear bond strength values than that of one-step self-etch adhesive.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Resin composite · repair · micro-shear

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of different adhesive systems on repair bond strength of aged resin composite.Materials and Methods: Ninety composite discs were built and half of them were subjected to thermal aging. Aged and non-aged specimens were repaired with resin composite using three different adhesive systems; a two-step self-etch adhesive, a two-step total-etch adhesive and a one-step self-etch adhesive; then they were subjected to shear forces. Data were analyzed statistically.Results: Adhesive type and aging significantly affected the repair bond strengths (p<0.0001). No statistical difference was found in aged composite groups repaired with two-stepself- etch or two-step total-etch adhesive. One-step self-etch adhesive showed lower bond strength values in aged composite repair (p<0.0001).Conclusion: In the repair of aged resin composite, two-step self-etch and two-step total-etch adhesives exhibited higher shear bond strength values than that of one-step self-etch adhesive.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

IRMAK, Ö., ÇELİKSÖZ, Ö., YILMAZ, B., YAMAN, B. C. (2017). ADHESIVE SYSTEM AFFECTS REPAIR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN COMPOSITE. European Oral Research, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 3, 25–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/242691

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Elderton RJ. Restorations without conventional cavity preparations. Int Dent J 1988;38(2):112-118. Simonsen RJ. New materials on the horizon. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122(7):24-31.
  2. Blum IR, Jagger DC, Wilson HH. Defective dental restorations: To repair or not to repair? Part 1: Direct composite restorations. SADJ 2011;66(3):114-118.
  3. Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Blaser PK, Mondragon E, Mjor IA. A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations: Results of a seven-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140(12):1476-1484.
  4. Moncada G, Fernandez E, Martin J, Arancibia C, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: A two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent 2008;33(3):258-264.
  5. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J, Jr., Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent 2005;7(1):41-49.
  6. Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA. Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent 1997;10(6):279-283.
  7. Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19(2):90-98; discussion 99. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: An in vitro study. J Dent 1998;26(8):685-694.
  8. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, Van Meerbeek B. Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair. J Dent 2011;39(7):499-505.
  9. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, Van Meerbeek B. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater 2011;27(7):701-709.
  10. Papacchini F, Toledano M, Monticelli F, Osorio R, Radovic I, Polimeni A, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. Hydrolytic stability of composite repair bond. Eur J Oral Sci 2007;115(5):417-424.
  11. Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13(3):317-323.
  12. Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, Ulker M. Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009;21(4):251-260.
  13. Hannig C, Laubach S, Hahn P, Attin T. Shear bond strength of repaired adhesive filling materials using different repair procedures. J Adhes Dent 2006;8(1):35-40.
  14. Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Immediate repair bond strengths