KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

An Investigation of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Teacher Quality in Turkey

Görsev SÖNMEZ BORAN
Burcu GÜRKAN
Nuri Can AKSOY
Sayfa
537–549
Yayın Tarihi
2019-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Present study also suggested both academic and practical implications

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Present study investigates the senior-level Turkish pre-service and in-service teachers’ perceptions of teacher quality with a descriptive survey method.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Data for this study were gathered through Teacher Quality Survey (TQS) and open-ended questions from 210 pre-service teachers enrolled in four different universities in Turkey and 147 in-service teachers from different majors.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Present study also suggested both academic and practical implications
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:in-service teacher · pre-service teacher · teacher education

Abstract

Present study investigates the senior-level Turkish pre-service and in-service teachers’ perceptions of teacher quality with a descriptive survey method. Data for this study were gathered through Teacher Quality Survey (TQS) and open-ended questions from 210 pre-service teachers enrolled in four different universities in Turkey and 147 in-service teachers from different majors. Results of the study showed that both pre-service and in-service teachers think that teachers’ relationship with the students affect students’ success and teachers should take the individual differences into consideration. Moreover, according to the pre-service teachers, teachers should know how to teach and assess what they teach, and they need to know time management. On the other hand, in-service teachers consider that teachers should follow current developments, should have the researcher identity and should understand students’ needs and interests. Present study also suggested both academic and practical implications

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BORAN, G. S., GÜRKAN, B., AKSOY, N. C. (2019). An Investigation of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Teacher Quality in Turkey. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 537–549. https://ajindex.com/articles/240276

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Akyüz, Y. (2009).
  2. Türk Eğitim Tarihi. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
  3. Ata, Bahri (2001). 1924 Türk basını ışığında Amerikalı eğitimci John Dewey’in Türkiye seyahati, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3). Bozdoğan, A. E., Aydın, D. & Yıldırım, K. (2007). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin tutumları, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 8(2). Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (Geliştirilmiş 2. baskı). Ankara:
  4. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Cresswell. J. (2002). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of State policy evidence. Journal of Education Policy Analysis, 8(1). Duck, L. (2000).
  5. The ongoing professional journey, Educational Leadership, 57(8), 43-45.
  6. Eby, J. (1994). Reflective planning, teaching and evaluation: K-12. New York: Merrill. Freeman, D. & Richards, R. J. (1993). Conceptions of Teaching and the Education of Second Language Teachers, TESOL Quartery, 27(2). Goldhaber, D. & Brewer, D. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school Teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2),129-146.
  7. Hanushek, E. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 100(1), 84-117.
  8. Hanushek, E. A. & Rivkin, S. G. (2007). Pay, working conditions and Teacher quality, Future of Children, 17(1). Harris, D. N. & Sass, T. R. (2010). Teacher training, teacher quality, student achievement, Journal of Public Economics, 95. Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara:
  9. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. M. E. (2015). Teacher quality and school improvement: what is the role of research?, Oxford Review of Education, 41(2). Okpala, C. O. & Ellis, R. (2000). The perceptions of college students on teacher quality: A Focus on teacher qualifications, Education, 126(2). Ornstein, A. C., & Levine, D. U. (2003). Foundations of education (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Özbek, R., Kahyaoğlu, M. & Özgen, N. (2007). Evaluation of Candidate Teachers’ Opinions on Teaching Profession, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2). Sabers, D., Selby, L., & Nolan, P. (1995). Computers empower students with special Needs, Educational Leadership, 53(2)., 82-84.
  10. Sanders, W. L. & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and res