KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Attitudes of Foreign Language Teaching Students and Teachers about Interactive Whiteboards

Neşet MUTLU
Sayfa
221–226
Yayın Tarihi
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Moreover, teachers mostly expressed that instruction with IWB is more enjoyable, brings more workload, allows better access to up-to-date learning materials, and contributes teachers’ professional development.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, researcher tried to understand Foreign Language Teaching (English Language Teaching – ELT, and German Language Teaching – GLT) students’ and teachers’ attitudes on interactive whiteboard (IWB) that they would use in foreign language teaching.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this respect, data were gathered from 210 ELT and GLT students and 8 teachers from these two language teaching departments in Erciyes University.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Moreover, teachers mostly expressed that instruction with IWB is more enjoyable, brings more workload, allows better access to up-to-date learning materials, and contributes teachers’ professional development.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:interactive white boards · attitude · foreign language teaching

Abstract

In this study, researcher tried to understand Foreign Language Teaching (English Language Teaching – ELT, and German Language Teaching – GLT) students’ and teachers’ attitudes on interactive whiteboard (IWB) that they would use in foreign language teaching. A descriptive study was selected by using survey method. In this respect, data were gathered from 210 ELT and GLT students and 8 teachers from these two language teaching departments in Erciyes University. Two questionnaires prepared by Manny-Ikan, Tikochinski, Zorman and Dagan (2011) were administered to understand attitudes of students and teachers: Teacher Attitudes Questionnaire (TAQ) and Students Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ). According to results; students mostly see learning via the IWB is enjoyable, easier, understandable, favourable, and interesting. Moreover, teachers mostly expressed that instruction with IWB is more enjoyable, brings more workload, allows better access to up-to-date learning materials, and contributes teachers’ professional development.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MUTLU, N. (2017). Attitudes of Foreign Language Teaching Students and Teachers about Interactive Whiteboards. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 221–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/239427

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Al-Qirim, N. (2011). Determinants of interactive white board success in teaching in higher education institutions. Computers & Education, 56(3), 827–838
  2. Barrett, S. (2014). Using Visuals to Help with Narrative Language, Retrieved on 15.11.2016 from http://missbarrettspeechlanguage.weebly.com/home/ using-visuals-to-help-with-narrative-language Çelen, F. K., Çelik, A. ve Seferoğlu, S. S. (2011). Türk Eğitim Sistemi ve PISA Sonuçları. XIII. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, Malatya, Türkiye. Jones, L., C. (2002). Using Technology in Language Teaching and Listening Comprehension: Revisiting What Teachers Should Know and Do, IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies. 34 (2). Luk, H. (2014). Spoken English Leaning Video Spoken English Tutorial English Conversation, Retrieved on 15.11.2016 from https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=IhQt_fxGOcw Manny-Ikan, E., Tikochinski, T. B., Zorman, R., & Dagan, O. (2011). Using the interactive white board in teaching and learning- an evaluation of the SMART classroom pilot project. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 7, 249-273.
  3. Mathews-Aydinli, M. J and Elaziz, F. (2010). Turkish students' and teachers' attitudes toward the use of Interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 235-252
  4. Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Çakır, R., Yılmaz, H. B., Ayas, C. (2013). The Use of Tablet PC and Interactive Board from the Perspectives of Teachers and Students: Evaluation of the FATİH Project, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1815-1822.
  5. Sabzian, F. & Gilakjani A. P. (2013). Teachers' attitudes about computer technology training, professional development, integration, experience, anxiety, and literacy in English language teaching and learning. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 3(1): 67-75.
  6. Sendurur, P. (2012). Identification of Factors Affecting Integration of Information and Communication Technologies in Basic Education Schools Grades From 4 Though 8 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  7. Somyürek, S., Atasoy, B., Özdemir, S., (2009) Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart? Computers and Education, 53 (2) (2009), pp. 368–374