Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

The Mediating Role Of Self-Efficacy In The Relationship Between Problem Solving And Hope

Sayfa
47–58
Yayın Tarihi
2020-02-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, it may be effective to take into account the components that will improve individuals' problem solving skills and perceptions about themselves while conducting the studies to raise the hope level, which is an important concept of psychological health.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The current study aims to investigate the relationship among problem solving, hope, and self-efficacy and to test a model for determining the role of self-efficacy in the relationship between problem solving and hope.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It adopted convenience sampling and consisted of 494 undergraduate students (369 females; 125 males).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, it may be effective to take into account the components that will improve individuals' problem solving skills and perceptions about themselves while conducting the studies to raise the hope level, which is an important concept of psychological health.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Hope · Problem solving · Self-efficacy

Abstract

The current study aims to investigate the relationship among problem solving, hope, and self-efficacy and to test a model for determining the role of self-efficacy in the relationship between problem solving and hope. It adopted convenience sampling and consisted of 494 undergraduate students (369 females; 125 males). The Hope Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale and Problem Solving Inventory were applied in order to collect the data. Pearson correlation analysis and two-step Structural Equation Modelling were used for data analysis. Findings revealed that while a high level of positive correlation existed among problem solving, self-efficacy and hope, a moderate positive relationship was found between self-efficacy and hope. As a result of Structural Equation Modelling, self-efficacy was found to be significantly predicted by problem solving whereas hope was observed to be significantly predicted by problem-solving and self-efficacy. In addition, mediation analysis demonstrated that the relationship between problem solving and hope emerged through the development of self-efficacy. As a result, this paper exhibited that individuals with developing problem solving ability had also developing self-efficacy, which in turn leads to an increase in hope. Therefore, it may be effective to take into account the components that will improve individuals' problem solving skills and perceptions about themselves while conducting the studies to raise the hope level, which is an important concept of psychological health.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇAM, Z., EŞKİSU, M., KARDAŞ, F., SAATÇİOĞLU, Ö., GELİBOLU, S. (2020). The Mediating Role Of Self-Efficacy In The Relationship Between Problem Solving And Hope. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 47–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/239385

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Abdollahi, A., Talib, M. A., Yaacob, S. N., & Ismail, Z. (2016). Problem-solving skills and suicidal ideation among malaysian college students: the mediating role of hopelessness. Academic Psychiatry, 40(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0383-0Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
  2. Atik, G., & Erkan Atik, Z. (2017). Predicting hope levels of high school students: The role of academic self-efficacy and problem solving. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(190), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.5348
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bandura, Albert. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
  4. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). Moderator-mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
  5. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. Carr, A. (2013). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths. London: Routledge. Cheng, S. K. (2001). Life stress, problem solving, perfectionism, and depressive symptoms in Chinese. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25(3), 303–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010788513083
  6. Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343 D’Zurilla, T. J., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1995). Conceptual and methodological issues in social problem-solving assessment. Behavior Therapy, 26(3), 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80091-7
  7. Duan, W., Ho, S. M. Y., Bai, Y., & Tang, X. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese virtues questionnaire. Research On Social Work Practice, 23(3), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731513477214
  8. Erözkan, A. (2014). Analysis of social problem solving and social self-efficacy in prospective teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.2.2014
  9. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guliford.Hefferon, K., Boniwell, I. (2