KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

A comparative analysis for the criteria of higher education selection

Emine AKKAŞ
Mustafa Batuhan AYHAN
Sayfa
38–50
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study can be enhanced by applying multi criteria decision making techniques such as, Analytical Hierarchy Process, to calculate the weights of the main and sub criteria more analytically in the further steps.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Profession selection is one of the most important decisions for human beings.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Since the professions can generally be achieved via higher education, determining the most proper higher education becomes an important decision problem.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study can be enhanced by applying multi criteria decision making techniques such as, Analytical Hierarchy Process, to calculate the weights of the main and sub criteria more analytically in the further steps.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Decision Making · higher education selection · criteria

Abstract

Profession selection is one of the most important decisions for human beings. Since the professions can generally be achieved via higher education, determining the most proper higher education becomes an important decision problem. In order to select the best higher education program, there are various criteria to be considered. Hence the main purpose of this study is to provide an analytical analysis of thirty three criteria under the heading of three main criteria for higher education selection. Then a case study was performed to find the relative weights and ranking of these main and sub criteria at a high school for different grade students. Depending on the comparison of weights and rankings of different grade students, it was inferred that according to their age and different grades, the students’ preferences change during their adolescence period regarding the higher education selection. This study can be enhanced by applying multi criteria decision making techniques such as, Analytical Hierarchy Process, to calculate the weights of the main and sub criteria more analytically in the further steps.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKKAŞ, E., AYHAN, M. B. (2018). A comparative analysis for the criteria of higher education selection. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 38–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/239342

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Altun, İ. (2000, March). Personal values of Kocaeli school of health students and factors affecting occupation selections. Paper presented at 1st International & 8th National Nursing Congress, Antalya, Turkey. Ayhan, M. B. and Atsay, F. (2011, May). Comparative analysis of prioritization of preference criteria for higher education. Paper presented at 1st International Higher Education Congress: New Trends and Issues, (pp. 1724-1731),
  2. Istanbul. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-Perception Theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6. 1-62. New York: Academic Press.
  3. Çelik, N. and Üzmez, U. (2014). Evaluation of university students’ affecting factors choice of profession. Electronic Journal of Occupational Improvement and Research, 2(1), 94-105.
  4. Gati, I. and Saka, N. (1980). High school students’ career-related decision-making difficulties. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 16(3), 282-298.
  5. Göksu, A. and Güngör, İ. (2008). Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and its application of university preference ranking. Suleyman Demirel University the Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 13(3), 1-26.
  6. İnce, S. and Khorshid, L. (2015). Determination of Factors Affecting Career Choices of Nursing Students. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 18(3), 163-171.
  7. Kılıç, H. S. and Ayhan M. B. (2011, May). Analyzing the factors in the university selection based on AHP: A case study among the students of Marmara University. Paper presented at 1st International Higher Education Congress: New Trends and Issues, (pp. 1839-1844),
  8. Istanbul. Kuzgun, Y. (2004). Introduction to vocational guidance and counselling. Ankara:
  9. Nobel Publishing, ISBN: 6051331041. Pekkaya, M. and Çolak, N. (2013). Determining the priorities of ratings via AHP for the factors that effects in choosing profession for the university students. International Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 797-818.
  10. Sarıkaya, T. and Khorshid, L. (2009). Examining the factors affecting the occupation choice of university students: Occupation selection of university students. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 7(2), 393-423.
  11. Saunders, J., Davis, L., Williams, T. and Williams, J. H. (2004). Gender differences in self perceptions and academic outcomes: A study of African American high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(1), 81-90.
  12. Sezer, Ö. (2010). The relationship between adolescents’ self-perception, parental attitudes, and some other variables. The Journ