Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Development and Validation of the Achievement Test on Body Systems

Sayfa
68–76
Yayın Tarihi
2016-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results indicate that Achievement Test of Body Systems has satisfactory psychometric properties and it can be accepted as appropriate for future use.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper presents evidence for the development and validation of an “Achievement Test on Body Systems” which is a unit in 7th class Science Education lesson.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The test was conforming the acquisitions described in the Turkish National Science Education Program for 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th classes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results indicate that Achievement Test of Body Systems has satisfactory psychometric properties and it can be accepted as appropriate for future use.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:achievement test · validity and reliability · body systems

Abstract

This paper presents evidence for the development and validation of an “Achievement Test on Body Systems” which is a unit in 7th class Science Education lesson. The test was conforming the acquisitions described in the Turkish National Science Education Program for 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th classes. At the same time, number of the acquisitions, step of the acquisitions according to Bloom's taxonomy, number of lessons to finish all units and formerly learned concepts were taken into account for creating items. The content validity of the test was reviewed and ensured by 1 expert and 2 science teachers. One of the teachers was doing her PhD degree and one of them was doing his master’s degree. The pilot test was made up of 48 items selected from initial 78 items and the sample consisted of 245 7th grade students. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Test (which is a measure of how suitable the data are for Factor Analysis) was done. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.89, and the result indicated that the sampling was adequate. Analyses based on classical test theory used 33% of the upper and lower classes for item difficulty and discrimination indices. And the KR-20 was used for the reliability. After omitting 3 items; the item difficulties were between 0.36 and 0.81, the item discrimination indices were between 0.40 and 0.89 and the internal consistency of the test (KR-20) was found as 0.898. Results indicate that Achievement Test of Body Systems has satisfactory psychometric properties and it can be accepted as appropriate for future use.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YERLİKAYA, A., GÜNEŞ, M. H. (2016). Development and Validation of the Achievement Test on Body Systems. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 68–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/239251

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Atılgan, T. L., Doğan, N., Kan, A., (2006). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. (Editör: Hakan Atılgan). Anı Yayıncılık, 480 s. Ankara.
  2. Balaban, M. and Güneş, M. H. (2012). Portfolio assessment in cooperation with teachers, students and parents in a science and technology course. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Issue 49/A, 289-310.
  3. Bezir Akçay, B. (2014). Bilimde Paradigmalar ve Bilimin Doğası. Şengül S. Anagün ve Nil Duban (Ed.) içinde Fen bilimleri Öğretimi. Ankara:
  4. Anı Yayıncılık. Brennan, R. L. (1972). A Generalized Upper-Lower Term Discrimination Index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32 (2), 289-303.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  6. Pegem Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık. Çepni,S., Ayas, A., Akdeniz, A. R., Yiğit, N., Özmen, H., Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2007) Kuramda Uygulamaya Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretimi.(Editör: Salih Çepni), Pegem A. Yayıncılık, 431 s., Ankara.
  7. Coştu, B. (2012). Ölçme ve Değerlendirmeyle İlgili Temel Kavramlar. Mehmet Küçük ve Yılmaz Geçit (Ed.) içinde Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme, Ankara:
  8. Nobel Yayıncılık. Demir, M. Y. (2009). Öğrenme: Giriş, Sorunlar ve Tarihsel Bakış Açıları. Muzaffer Şahin (Çev. Ed.). içinde Öğrenme Teorileri. Ankara:
  9. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Demir, S., Gürer, C.,Köksal, T. & Dolu, O. (2009). Kavram Oluşturma ve Ölçüm. (Ed.) Kaan Böke. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul:
  10. Alfa Yayıncılık. Demirel, Ö. (2002). Planlamadan Değerlendirmeye Öğretme Sanatı. Pegem A Yayıncılık, 431. s., Ankara.
  11. Ding, L., Chabay, R., Sherwood, B. & Beichner, R. (2006). Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 2, 010105, 2 (1), Durmuş, S. (2005). Öğrenme: Perspektifler. Anakara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Erdoğan, İ. (2012). Pozitivist Metodoloji ve Ötesi. Ankara:ERK Yayınları.
  12. Erkuş, A. (2011). Davranış Bilimleri İçin Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci. Ankara:
  13. Seçkin Yayıncılık. Geçit, Y. (22012). Geleneksel Ölçme Araçları ve Özellikleri. Mehmet Küçük & Yılmaz Geçit (Eds.) içinde Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. Izard, J. (1993). Challenges to the Improvement of Assessment Practice, In M. Niss (Ed.). Investigations Into Assessment in Mathemetics Education, Kluver Academic Publishers,
  14. Netherlands. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Pscho