KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2016 / Special Issue 2016 II

Examination and Evaluation of Websites of Science Centres in Turkey

Aykut Emre BOZDOĞAN
Kerem BOZDOĞAN
Sayfa
71–79
Yayın Tarihi
2016-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

At the end of the study, it was determined that under some circumstances the websites of the science centres were useful, where as they were inadequate under some conditions

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Science centres which have a considerable importance and functions in developed countries are intended to be popularized in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The research study was carried out via descriptive survey method and between September 14 and September 18, 2015 the key word “science centre” was searched on Google.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:At the end of the study, it was determined that under some circumstances the websites of the science centres were useful, where as they were inadequate under some conditions
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Science Centre · Website · Informal Learning

Abstract

Science centres which have a considerable importance and functions in developed countries are intended to be popularized in Turkey. At this point considering the fact that the first contact between science centres and visitors is usually provided with websites, it is quite important that the content of these websites should be designed and developed to meet the needs of the visitors. From this point of view, the aim of this study is to examine the websites of the science centres in Turkey and to reveal at what level they meet the needs of the visitors. The research study was carried out via descriptive survey method and between September 14 and September 18, 2015 the key word “science centre” was searched on Google. Out of the science centres found, twelve science centres were included in the study. During the process of analysis of the documents obtained, two researchers examined every single data on the website separately and then they combined and tabulated them. Within this context, four main titles were obtained: a) information and news b) activities and the documents, c) Visuals, and d) Contact, Appointment, and Booking. At the end of the study, it was determined that under some circumstances the websites of the science centres were useful, where as they were inadequate under some conditions

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOZDOĞAN, A. E., BOZDOĞAN, K. (2016). Examination and Evaluation of Websites of Science Centres in Turkey. Participatory Educational Research, Special Issue 2016 II, 71–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/239180

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Bozdoğan, A. E. (2007). Role and Importance Of Science And Technology Museum in Education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gazi University, Enstitude of Educational Science. Ankara, Turkey. (Unpublished Doktoral Dissertation). Chin, C. (2004). Museum experience – A resource for science teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 63-90.
  2. Cox-Petersen A. M. (1999). Dive into research at the Aquarium. Science Activities. 36 (3), 34-36.
  3. Cox-Petersen, A. M., Marsh, D. D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L. M. (2003). Investigation of guided tours, student learning and science reform. Reccomendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 200–218.
  4. Demirboğa, E. (2010). Sanal Müze Ziyaretlerinin Öğrencilerin Bilişsel ve Duyuşsal Kazanımları Üzerindeki Etkileri. Gazi Üniversitesi,
  5. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Durmuş, A. (2012). Sanal Bilim ve Teknoloji Müzesinde Eğitsel Ara yüz Ajanı Kullanımının Öğrencilerin İlgi Ve Başarılarına Etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Griffin, J. (1994). Learning to learn in informal science settings. Research in Science Education, 24, 121–128.
  6. Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the students in school groups. Science Education. 88 (Supp.-1), 59-70.
  7. Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81 (6), 763–779.
  8. Guisasola, J; Morentin, M. and Zuza, K. (2005) School visits to science museums and learning sciences: A complex relationship. Physics Education. 40 (6), 544-549.
  9. Güleç, S. & Alkış, S. (2003). Sosyal Bilgiler öğretiminde müze gezilerinin iletişimsel boyutu. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 63-78.
  10. Kisiel, J. (2003). Teachers, museums, and worksheets: A closer look at learning experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 3–21.
  11. Kisiel, J. F. (2007). Examining teacher choices for science museum worksheets. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18 (1), 29–43.
  12. MEB. (2013). 3-8. Sınıflar Fen Bilimleri dersi öğretim program. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, Ankara.
  13. Price, S., & Hein, G. E. (1991). More than a field trip: Science programs for elementary school groups at museums. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 404–519.
  14. Ramey-Gassert, L., Walberg III, H. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). Re