KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

How Do Elementary Childhood Education Teachers Perceive Robotic Education in Kindergarten? A Qualitative Study

Feray UĞUR ERDOĞMUŞ
Sayfa
421–434
Yayın Tarihi
2021-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Suggestions for future studies and practitioners were also included.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Robotic education is a popular topic in recent years.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:There are robotic education courses from pre-K to K-12 and these courses claim that they support STEM education.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Suggestions for future studies and practitioners were also included.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:robotic education · early childhood education · qualitative study

Abstract

Robotic education is a popular topic in recent years. There are robotic education courses from pre-K to K-12 and these courses claim that they support STEM education. However, the teacher’s perception of these activities and needs for this education is the missing part of the chain. The aim of this study to find out the perceptions and suggestions of early childhood teachers about robotic education in kindergartens. This is a qualitative phenomenological study. Ten early childhood education (ECE) teachers were the participants of this study. A semi-structured interview form was developed and in-depth interviews were conducted to collect qualitative data. After that codes and themes were defined through the content analysis process. The results of this study showed that ECE teachers have a positive attitude towards robotic education in kindergarten. The current status of kindergarten, perceived advantages/disadvantages of robotic education, and ideal robotic education were the emerged themes during data analysis. According to results, ECE teachers thought that there are many needs like teacher training, materials, curriculum, infrastructure, technical support, and parent education for implementing robotic education properly in kindergartens. Also, teachers underlined that robotics education could be beneficial for motivation, knowledge, thinking skills, development, and psychomotor skills of children. Results also revealed ECE teachers’ suggestions about ideal robotic education in kindergartens. Suggestions for future studies and practitioners were also included.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERDOĞMUŞ, F. U. (2021). How Do Elementary Childhood Education Teachers Perceive Robotic Education in Kindergarten? A Qualitative Study. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 421–434. https://ajindex.com/articles/239056

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Apiola, M., & Tedre, M. (2013). Deepening Learning through Learning-by-Inventing. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 185–202. https://doi.org/10.28945/1885. Arís, N., & Orcos, L. (2019). Educational Robotics in the Stage of Secondary Education: Empirical Study on Motivation and STEM Skills. Educational Sciences, 9(2). Barak, M., & Zadok, Y. (2009). Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9043-3
  2. Beisser, S. R. (2012). An examination of gender differences in elementary constructionist classrooms using lego/logo instruction. Classroom Integration of Type II Uses of Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v22n03_02
  3. Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
  4. Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM Narrative: 15 Years in the Making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7). Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E., Robb, M., & Schomburg, R. (2013). Adoption and use of technology in early education: The interplay of extrinsic barriers and teacher attitudes. Computers and Education, 69, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.024
  5. Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM Education. Science, 329. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194998
  6. Cherniak, S., Lee, K., Cho, E., & Jung, S. E. (2019). Child-identified problems and their robotic solutions. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 17(4), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X19860557
  7. Chootongchai, S., Songkram, N., & Piromsopa, K. (2019). Dimensions of robotic education quality: teachers’ perspectives as teaching assistants in Thai elementary schools. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10041-1
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). Boylston Street, Boston: Pearson. Di Lieto, M. C., Inguaggiato, E., Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dell’Omo, M., … Dario, P. (2017). Educational Robotics intervention on Executive Functions in preschool children: A pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.018
  9. Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). STEM Occupations: Past, present, and future. Spotlight on Statist