Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Statistical power and precision of experimental studies originated in the Republic of Turkey from 2010 to 2020: Current practices and some recommendations

Sayfa
24–43
Yayın Tarihi
2021-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Findings should be interpreted considering minimum effects in education that are relevant to education policy and practice.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study systematically reviews randomly selected 155 experimental studies in education field originated in the Republic of Turkey between 2010 and 2020.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Third, results indicate that studies are sufficiently powered to detect medium effects and above (Cohen’s d ≥ 0.50), however they are underpowered to detect small effects (Cohen’s d ≤ 0.20).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Findings should be interpreted considering minimum effects in education that are relevant to education policy and practice.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:experimental design · systematic review · minimum detectable effect size

Abstract

This study systematically reviews randomly selected 155 experimental studies in education field originated in the Republic of Turkey between 2010 and 2020. Indiscriminate choice of sample size in recent publications prompted us to evaluate their statistical power and precision. First, above and beyond our review, we could not identify any large-scale experiments such as cluster-randomized or multisite randomized trials, which overcome shortcomings of small-scale experiments, better suit to the organizational structure of the education field, nevertheless require far greater effort and financial resources. Second, none of the small-scale experiments has reported or conducted ex-ante power analysis. Third, results indicate that studies are sufficiently powered to detect medium effects and above (Cohen’s d ≥ 0.50), however they are underpowered to detect small effects (Cohen’s d ≤ 0.20). Trends in the past ten years indicate precision remained unchanged. We made several recommendations to increase the precision of experimental designs and improve their evidential values: Determine sample size prior to an experiment with power analysis routine, randomize subjects / clusters to obtain unbiased estimates, collect pre-test information and other relevant covariates, adjust for baseline differences beyond covariate control, document attrition, report standardized treatment effect and standardized variance parameters. Findings should be interpreted considering minimum effects in education that are relevant to education policy and practice.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BULUS, M., KOYUNCU, İ. (2021). Statistical power and precision of experimental studies originated in the Republic of Turkey from 2010 to 2020: Current practices and some recommendations. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 24–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/239008

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Arıcı, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2015). The effect of origami-based instruction on spatial visualization, geometry achievement, and geometric reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9487-8
  2. Arsal, Z. (2014). Microteaching and pre-service teachers’ sense of self-efficacy in teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 453-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.912627
  3. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I. Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay. Bloom, H. S. (1995). Minimum detectable effects a simple way to report the statistical power of experimental designs. Evaluation Review, 19(5), 547-556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9501900504
  4. Bloom, H. S. (2005). Randomizing groups to evaluate place-based programs. In H. S. Bloom (Ed.), Learning more from social experiments evolving analytic approaches (pp. 115–172).
  5. New York, NY: Russell Sage. Bloom, H. S. (2006). The core analytics of randomized experiments for social research. MDRC Working Papers on Research Methodology. New York, NY: MDRC. Retrieved from https://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/full_533.pdf
  6. Bloom, H. S., Bos, J. M., & Lee, S. W. (1999). Using cluster random assignment to measure program impacts: Statistical Implications for the evaluation of education programs. Evaluation Review, 23(4), 445–469. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0193841X9902300405
  7. Bloom, H. S., Hill, C. J., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(4), 289-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802400072
  8. Boruch, R. F. (2005). Better evaluation for evidence based policy: Place randomized trials in education, criminology, welfare, and health. The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 599. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0002716205275610
  9. Boruch, R. F., DeMoya, D., & Snyder, B. (2002). The importance of randomized field trials in education and related areas. In F. Mosteller & R. F. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized fields trials in education research (pp. 50–79).
  10. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  11. Boruch, R. F. & Foley, E. (2000). The honestly experimental society. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Validity and social experiments: Donald Campbell’s legacy (pp. 193–239