Dergiler / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

The Post-Discharge Growth of Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants

Sayfa
140–145
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

CONCLUSION: Small for gestational age newborns were found to catch up with appropriate for gestational age newborns at 2 years corrected age in terms of growth, although the percentage of catch-up growth during follow-up at the 40th gestational week, and at the 6th, 12th and 18th months was lower than that of appropriate for gestational age newborns.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we investigate the growth characteristics of very low birth weight premature infants of up to two years corrected age, considering the factors affecting growth and catch-up growth time.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:STUDY DESIGN: The demographic data, clinical features, and comorbidities of 77 preterm infants with birth weights of less than or equal to 1.500 g were examined, the infants’ growth statuses in the 40th gestational week and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months the corrected age, including their weight, height and head circumference, were evaluated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:CONCLUSION: Small for gestational age newborns were found to catch up with appropriate for gestational age newborns at 2 years corrected age in terms of growth, although the percentage of catch-up growth during follow-up at the 40th gestational week, and at the 6th, 12th and 18th months was lower than that of appropriate for gestational age newborns.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we investigate the growth characteristics of very low birth weight premature infants of up to two years corrected age, considering the factors affecting growth and catch-up growth time. STUDY DESIGN: The demographic data, clinical features, and comorbidities of 77 preterm infants with birth weights of less than or equal to 1.500 g were examined, the infants’ growth statuses in the 40th gestational week and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months the corrected age, including their weight, height and head circumference, were evaluated. RESULTS: The findings revealed that very low birth weight infants should be closely monitored either during their stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, or for up to 6 months corrected age, paying particular attention to growth data, and the appropriate supportive treatment should be administered. The applied support process is influential on the future somatic growth of preterm infants. It was noted in the study that bronchopulmonary dysplasia, proven sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, steroid treatment for more than three days, patent ductus arteriosus, and ibuprofen treatment seemed to affect somatic growth negatively. CONCLUSION: Small for gestational age newborns were found to catch up with appropriate for gestational age newborns at 2 years corrected age in terms of growth, although the percentage of catch-up growth during follow-up at the 40th gestational week, and at the 6th, 12th and 18th months was lower than that of appropriate for gestational age newborns.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZDEMİR, T., AKCAN, A. B., TÜRKMEN, M. (2020). The Post-Discharge Growth of Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 140–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/226955

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Silverstein M, Feinberg E, Young R, Sauder S. Maternal depression, perceptions of children’s social aptitude and reported activity restriction among former very low birth weight infants. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95(7):521-5
  2. Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Requejo et al. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(1):31-8
  3. Verma RP, Sridhar S, Spitzer AR. Continuing care of NICU graduates. Clin Pediatr (Phila).2003;42(4):299-315
  4. Roberts G, Cheong JL. Long-term growth and general health for the tiniest or most immature infants. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19(2):118-24
  5. Wang PW, Fang LJ, Tsou KI. Taiwan Infant Developmental Collaborative Study Group. The growth of very-low-birth-weight infants at 5 years old in Taiwan. Pediatr Neonatal. 2014;55(2):114-9
  6. Bracewell MA, Hennessy EM, Wolke D, Marlow N. The EPICure study: growth and blood pressure at 6 years of age following extremely preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93(2):F108-14
  7. Kytnarova J, Zlatohlavkova B, Kubena A, Markova D, Dokoupilova M, Plavka R, et al. Post-natal growth of 157 children born as extremely premature neonates. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011;47(3):111-6
  8. Dusick A, Vohr BR, Steichen J, Wright LL, Mele L, Verter J. Factors affecting growth outcome at 18 months in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Pediatr Res. 1998;43:213
  9. Saigal S, Stoskopf B, Streiner D, Paneth N, Pinelli J, Boyle M. Growth trajectories of extremely low birth weight infants from birth to young adulthood: a longitudinal, population-based study. Pediatr Res. 2006;60(6):751-8
  10. McCowan L, Harding J, Barker S, Ford C. Perinatal predictors of growth at six months in small for gestational age babies. Early Hum Dev.1999;56(2-3):205-16
  11. Kavuncuoğlu S, Hanedan S, Hatipoğlu N, Aktay Ayaz N, Öztürk S, Öztürk H. Catch up growth features of premature infants and effects of different patterns of nutrition on growth. Turk Arch Pediatrics. 2001;36(1):26-31
  12. Tenovuo A, Kero P, Piekkala P, Korvenranta H, Sillanpaa M, Erkkola R. Growth of 519 small for gestational age infants during the first two years of life. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1987;76(4):636-46
  13. Yeşinel S, Aldemir EY, Kavuncuoğlu S, Yeşinel S, Yıldız H. Evaluation of growth in very low birth weight preterm babies. Turk Arch Pediatrics. 2014;49(4):289-98
  14. Piekkala P, Kero P, Sillanpaa M, Erkkola R. The somatic g