Dergiler / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Perinatal Outcome of Fetal Echogenic Bowel: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Sayfa
1–5
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Further clinical studies are warranted to evaluate this relationship.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate perinatal outcome of fetal echogenic bowel.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, fetuses with echogenic bowel diagnosed and followed in our center between 2013-2017 were included.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Further clinical studies are warranted to evaluate this relationship.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2013-2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate perinatal outcome of fetal echogenic bowel. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, fetuses with echogenic bowel diagnosed and followed in our center between 2013-2017 were included. Fetuses and infants were evaluated in terms of antenatal comorbidities and postnatal persistent diseases. Infants were followed-up to June 2018 from time of diagnosis. Demographic questionnaire and face to face interview were used to obtain data including immune system diseases and respiratory system pathologies in infants. RESULTS: A total of 100 fetuses with echogenic bowel were included in the study. Fetal aneuploidy was detected in 7 (7%) cases. Trisomy 21 was the most common aneuploidy and identified in 4 (4%) cases. Other chromosomal disorders were tetrasomy 12p (1%), 69XXX (1%) and 46 XX, t (2,22) (9q9) (1%). A fetal echogenic bowel was associated with major congenital malformations in 25 (%25) cases. Cardiac abnormality was the most prevalent (%7). First and second trimester vaginal bleeding history was found in 5 pregnant women. In 3 case with isolated echogenic bowel (no congenital malformation and aneuploidy), lactose intolerance, celiac disease, and non-obstructive hydrocephalus were diagnosed in early childhood. CONCLUSION: Isolated fetal echogenic bowel which can be considered as a soft marker for aneuploidy may be associated with lactose intolerance and celiac disease. Further clinical studies are warranted to evaluate this relationship.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞAL, H., CÖMERT, E., EKİNCİ, Y. S., ARAN, T. (2021). Perinatal Outcome of Fetal Echogenic Bowel: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/226937

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Sukupova M. Dhaifalah I. Adamik Z. Havalova J. Hyperechogenic fetal bowel as a marker of fetal cystic fibrosis. Ceska Gynekol. 2015;80(1):20-4
  2. Catania VD. Taddei A. Pellegrino M. De Marco EA. Merli L. Manzoni C. et al. Hyperechogenic Bowel: Etiologies, Management, and Outcome according to Gestational Age at Diagnosis in 279 Consecutive Cases in a Single Center. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017;27(1):109-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597671
  3. Masini G, Maggio L, Marchi L, Cavalli I, Ledda C, Trotta M, et al. Isolated fetal echogenic bowel in a retrospective cohort: The role of infection screening. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;231:136-41
  4. Lince DM, Pretorius DH, Manco-Johnson ML, Manchester D, Clewell WH. The clinical significance of increased echogenicity in the fetal abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;145(4):683-6
  5. Buiter HD, Holswilder-Olde Scholtenhuis MA, Bouman K, van Baren R, Bilardo CM, Bos AF. Outcome of infants presenting with echogenic bowel in the second trimester of pregnancy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98(3):F256-9
  6. Ekin A. Gezer C. Taner CE. Ozeren M. The effect of associated structural malformations in the prediction of chromosomal abnormality risk of fetuses with echogenic bowel. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(1):41-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.986091
  7. De Oronzo MA. Hyperechogenic fetal bowel: an ultrasonographic marker for adverse fetal and neonatal outcome? J Prenat Med. 2011;5(1):9-13
  8. Jackson CR. Orford J. Minutillo C. Dickinson JE. Dilated and echogenic fetal bowel and postnatal outcomes: a surgical perspective. Case series and literature review. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2010;20(3):191-3. doi:10.1055/s-0030- 1247523
  9. Miller ME. Allen VM. Brock JK. Incidence and Carrier Frequency of CFTR Gene Mutations in Pregnancies With Echogenic Bowel in Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40(7):896-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.11.021
  10. Ronin C. Mace P. Stenard F. Loundou A. Capelle M. Mortier I. et al. Antenatal prognostic factor of fetal echogenic bowel. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;212:166-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.060
  11. Mailath-Pokorny M. Klein K. Klebermass-Schrehof K. 5 Sal H. Comert EH. Ekici YS. Aran T. Hachemian N. Bettelheim D. Are fetuses with isolated echogenic bowel at higher risk for an adverse pregnancy outcome? Experiences from a tertiary referral center. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(13):1295-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.3999
  12. Nigro G. Adler SP. Gatta E. Ma