KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Glokom Katarakt / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium and Retinal Nerve Fiber Parameters in Patients with Unilateral Pseudoexfoliation

Mehmet Yavuz COŞKUN
Sayfa
18–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions:In patients with PEX, there were no difference in corneal endothelial parameters when compared with the contra lateral eyes of same patients with no PEX and eyes of healthy controls, whereas thinning was observed in some quadrants in terms of RNFL thickness.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: Evaluation of corneal endothelium and retinal nerve fi ber values in patients with unilateral pseudoexfoliation (PEX).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and methods: The patients were retrospectively evaluated; 30 eyes of 30 patients with unilateral PEX were specifi ed as group 1, the contralateral 30 eyes of the same 30 patients without PEX were designated as group 2, and 30 right eyes of sex and age-matched healthy subjects were evaluated as a controls group (group 3).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions:In patients with PEX, there were no difference in corneal endothelial parameters when compared with the contra lateral eyes of same patients with no PEX and eyes of healthy controls, whereas thinning was observed in some quadrants in terms of RNFL thickness.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Purpose: Evaluation of corneal endothelium and retinal nerve fi ber values in patients with unilateral pseudoexfoliation (PEX). Material and methods: The patients were retrospectively evaluated; 30 eyes of 30 patients with unilateral PEX were specifi ed as group 1, the contralateral 30 eyes of the same 30 patients without PEX were designated as group 2, and 30 right eyes of sex and age-matched healthy subjects were evaluated as a controls group (group 3). The study group consisted of 30 participants in total. Central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (CD), coeffi cient of variation (CV) and hexagonality (HEX) parameters were analyzed, which were measured using specular microscopy. Retinal nerve fi ber thickness of the superior (SRNFL), nasal (NRNFL), inferior (IRNFL) and temporal (TRNFL) quadrants and also ganglion cell inner plexiform layer thickness (GC-IPL) were measured using optical coherence tomography and analyzed. Results: The mean age of study group was 64,66±7,04 years. In group 2, SRNFL, NRNFL and IRNFL were signifi cantly higher than in group 1; no other parameters showed any signifi cant difference. SRNFL, NRNFL, IRNFL and TRNFL values were signifi cantly higher in group 3 than in group 1; no other parameters were signifi cantly different. IRNFL and TRNFL values were signifi cantly lower in group 2 compared with group 3, no other signifi cant differences were found between these two groups. Conclusions:In patients with PEX, there were no difference in corneal endothelial parameters when compared with the contra lateral eyes of same patients with no PEX and eyes of healthy controls, whereas thinning was observed in some quadrants in terms of RNFL thickness.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

COŞKUN, M. Y. (2020). Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium and Retinal Nerve Fiber Parameters in Patients with Unilateral Pseudoexfoliation. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 18–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/226408

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Yanoff M, Duker JS. Ophthalmology, 223. Chapter, Hayat Medicine Publisher 2007; 1499-504
  2. Naumann GO, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Kuchle M. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome for the comprehensive ophthalmologist. _ntraocular and systemic manifestataions. Review. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:951-68
  3. Kuchle M, Amberg A, Martus P, et al. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and secondary cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:862-6
  4. Schlotzer-Schrehardt UM, Koca MR, Naumann GO, et al. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ocular manifestataion of a systemic disorder?. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992; 110:1752-6
  5. Streeten BW, Li ZY, Wallace RN, et al. Pseudoexfoliative fi brillopathy in visceral organs of a patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110:1757-62
  6. Shields B. The shape of glaucoma.Quantitative neural imaging techniques. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:821-3
  7. Naumann GO, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U. Keratopathy in pseudoexfoliation syndrome as a cause of corneal endothelial decompensation: a clinicopathologic study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1111-24
  8. Morrrison JC, Gren WR. Light microscopy of the exfoliation syndrome. Review. Acta Ophthalmol. Suppl 1988; 66:5-27
  9. Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Von der Mark K, Sakai LY, et al. Increased extracellular deposition of fibrillin-containing fibrils in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38:970-84
  10. Hammer T, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Naumann GO. Unilateral or asymmetric pseudoexfoliation syndrome? An ultrastructural study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1023-31
  11. Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Hourihan F. The relationship between glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1319-24
  12. Wirbelauer C, Anders N, Pham DT, et al. Corneal endothelial cell changes in pseudoexfoliation syndrome after cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Feb;116:145-9
  13. Puska P, Vesti E, Tomita G, et al. Optic disc changesin normotensive personswith unilateral exfoliation syndrome: A 3 year follow-up study. Graefes Arch Clin PEXp Ophthalmol 1999; 237:457-62
  14. Henry CJ, Krupin T, Schmitt M, et al. Long-term follow up of pseudoexfoliation and the development of elevated intraocular pressure. Ophthalmol 1987;94:545-50 15. Konstas AGP. Glaucoma in eyes with exfoliation syndrome. 3 rd International Glaucoma Synposium- IGS. Prague, Czech Republic, March 21-25,2001. Book of abstracts, page 5
  15. Slaagsvold JE. The follow-up in patients with pseudoexfoliation of the lens capsule with and with