Dergiler / Glokom Katarakt / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery

Sayfa
162–168
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There was no signifi cant correlation between preoperative ACA, ACV, ACD and AL, and postoperative refractive error.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: Postoperative refraction has become important with improvements in cataract surgery.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 231 patients who underwent P-IOL implantation between January 2012 and June 2014.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There was no signifi cant correlation between preoperative ACA, ACV, ACD and AL, and postoperative refractive error.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Purpose: Postoperative refraction has become important with improvements in cataract surgery. In this study, our aim was to investigate the effects of phacoemulsifi cation-intraocular lens (P-IOL) implantation on anterior chamber angle (ACA), anterior chamber volume (ACV), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and to assess relationship between these parameters and axial length (AL) and postoperative refractive error. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 231 patients who underwent P-IOL implantation between January 2012 and June 2014. Scheimpfl ug imaging system was used for the determination of ACA, ACV and ACD values at preoperative and postoperative month 3. Partial coherence laser interferometry was used for preoperative AL, target postoperative refractive error and IOL power calculated by SRK-T formula. Spherical equivalent (SE=spherical error plus cylindrical error /2) at postoperative month 3 was recorded. Postoperative refractive error was calculated as mean error (ME=postoperative refraction-target refraction) and mean absolute error (MAE=absolute of ME). Data obtained at preoperative period and postoperative month 3 were compared. Results: Preoperative ACA, ACV, ACD were 30,2 ±12,1°, 130,7 ±41,2 mm³, 2,6 ±0,4 mm while postoperative ACA, ACV, ACD were 42,7 ±5,8°, 172,1 ±28,2 mm³, 4,1 ±0,7 mm respectively. Anterior chamber parameters were increased after P-IOL implantation, as all differences being statistically signifi cant (p=0.001). No signifi cant correlation was found between ME and ACA, ACV, ACD, AL. Again, no signifi cant correlation was found between MAE and ACA, ACV, ACD. Only a weak correlation was found between MAE and AL. Conclusion: Anterior chamber parameters measurements after P-IOL are signifi cantly increased compared to preoperative values. There was no signifi cant correlation between preoperative ACA, ACV, ACD and AL, and postoperative refractive error.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAHAN, B., KIRIK, F., KOYTAK, A., OZDEMIR, H. (2020). The Relationship Between Preoperative Anterior Chamber Parameters and Postoperative Refractive Error in Cataract Surgery. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 162–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/226405

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Tappin MJ, Ferguson VM. Per-operative retinoscopy as a predictor of fi nal post-operative refraction. Eye (Lond) 1999;13:559-61
  2. Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye (Lond) 2002;16:552- 6
  3. Koranyi G, Lydahl E, Norrby S, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement: a-scan versus optical methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:243-7
  4. Altan C, Bayraktar S, Altan T, et al. Anterior chamber depth, iridocorneal angle width, and intraocular pressure changes after uneventful phacoemulsifi cation in eyes without glaucoma and with open iridocorneal angles. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:832-8
  5. Kashiwagi K, Kashiwagi F, Tsukahara S. Effects of small-incision phacoemulsifi cation and intraocular lens implantation on anterior chamber depth and intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 2006;15:103-9
  6. Miyata K, Otani S, Honbou N, et al. Use of Scheimpfl ug corneal anterior-posterior imaging in ray-tracing intraocular lens power calculation. Acta Ophthalmol 2013;91:546-9
  7. Kelman CD. Phaco-emulsiftcation and aspiration: A new technique of cataract removal (a preliminary report). Am J Ophthalmol 1967;64:23-35
  8. Ucakhan OO, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A. Anterior chamber parameters measured by the Pentacam CES after uneventful phacoemulsifi cation in normotensive eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 2009;87:544-8
  9. Doganay S, Bozgul Firat P, Emre S, et al. Evaluation of anterior segment parameter changes using the Pentacam after uneventful phacoemulsifi cation. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:601-6
  10. Simon SS, Chee YE, Haddadin RI, et al. Achieving target refraction after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2014;121:440-4
  11. Kugelberg M, Lundstrom M. Factors related to the degree of success in achieving target refraction in cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:1935-9. 12. de Juan V, Martin R, Perez I, et al. Infl uence of axial length in refractive outcome after cataract surgery. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2010;85:144-8
  12. Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:368-76
  13. Ueda T, Ikeda H, Ota T, et al. Relationship between postoperative refractive outcomes and cataract density: multiple regression analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:806-9
  14. Briesen S, Ng EY, Roberts H. Validity of fi rst post-operative day automated refraction following dense cataract extractio