Dergiler / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

Pomological Changes in Some Rosehip Species During Ripening

Sayfa
214–222
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result of the obtained results, it was concluded that the most suitable harvest time in rosehips were the end of the fourth period or the beginning of the fifth period when the fruit did not soften yet.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Some pomological characteristics of some rosehips (Rosa sp) belonging to different Rosa species were investigated during the ripening period.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Rosehip fruits were harvested in 6 different periods from July to September depending on the ripening of the species.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result of the obtained results, it was concluded that the most suitable harvest time in rosehips were the end of the fourth period or the beginning of the fifth period when the fruit did not soften yet.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Flesh · firmness · harvest time

Abstract

Some pomological characteristics of some rosehips (Rosa sp) belonging to different Rosa species were investigated during the ripening period. Rosehip fruits were harvested in 6 different periods from July to September depending on the ripening of the species. In the determination of the first four times of the harvest, the color convention of the fruits and in the determination of the last two times, the status of the flesh fruit softening was based. The fruit characteristics such as the fruit weight, the soluble solid matter, the dry matter, the percentage of fruit flesh, the fruit firmness, the pH, the titratable acidity, and fruit color changes were determined. harvest to last As a result, the fruit weight of the genotypes reflected a steady trend from the first one. The soluble solid and dry matters, the percentage of fruit flesh, and the titratable acidity increased during ripening. The pH changed as the acidic and fruit firmness decreased. While the fruit lightness (L) and yellowness (b) decreased, the redness (a) increased. A positive correlation was found between the soluble solid matter and the titratable acidity. Also, the same correlation was recorded between both the pH and the titratable acidity. As a result of the obtained results, it was concluded that the most suitable harvest time in rosehips were the end of the fourth period or the beginning of the fifth period when the fruit did not soften yet.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNEŞ, M., DÖLEK, Ü., ELMASTAŞ, M. (2016). Pomological Changes in Some Rosehip Species During Ripening. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 214–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/224520

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Anonymous (2012 a). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, General Directorate of Plant Production, Plant Varieties Bulletin No: 2013-02 Publishing Date: 30.06.2013 Page 10-18. Anonymous (2012 b). Yıllık Hava Tahmin Raporları. Devlet Meteoroloji İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Tokat. (29.11.2012 ) Anonymous (2015). Çeşit Kataloğu, 2015. Tohumluk Tescil ve Sertifikasyon Merkez Müdürlüğü, 06172 Yenimahalle/Ankara. 198 sayfa. Cemeroğlu B (1992). Meyve ve Sebze İşleme Endüstrisinde Temel Analiz Metodları. Biltav Yayınları. Ankara 381s. Çelik F (2007). Vangölü Havzası kuşburnu (Rosa spp.) genetik kaynaklarının seleksiyonu ve Mevcut biyolojik çeşitliliğin tespiti. (Doktora Tezi). Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Van, Turkey. Doğan A and Kazankaya A (2006). Fruit properties of rosehip species grown in Lake Van basin (Eastern Anatolia Region). Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 5: 120-122.
  2. Ercişli S, Eşitken A and Güleryüz M (2001). Erzurum ili merkez ilçe ile Pazaryolu, Pasinler ve Tortum ilçelerinde doğal olarak yetişen kuşburnuların seleksiyonla seçimi. Bahçe 29: 39-44.
  3. Ercişli S (2007). Chemical composition of fruits in some rose (Rosa spp.) species. Food Chemistry 104: 1379-1384.
  4. Egea I, Sánchez-Bel P, Romojaro F and Pretel MT (2010). Six edible wild fruits as potential antioxidant additives or nutritional supplements. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 65: 121-129.
  5. Güneş M ve Şen SM (2001). Tokat yöresinde doğal olarak yetişen kuşburnuların (Rosa spp.) seleksiyon yoluyla ıslahı üzerinde bir araştırma. Bahçe 30 (1-2): 9-16.
  6. Güneş M and Dölek Ü (2010). Fruit characteristics of promising native rosehip genotypes grown in Mid-North Anatolia region of Turkey. Journal of Food, Agriculture &Environment 8: 460-463.
  7. Kazankaya A, Yılmaz H ve Yılmaz M (2001). Adilcevaz yöresinde doğal olarak yetişen kusburnuların seleksiyonu. YYÜ. Z.Fak Dergisi 11: 29-34.
  8. Kazankaya A, Türkoglu N, Yılmaz M and Balta MF (2005). Pomological description of Rosa canina selections from eastern Anatolia. Turkey. Int.J.Botany 1: 100-102.
  9. Kovacs S, Toth M, Udvardy L and Fascar G (2005). Phenelogical, morphological and pomological characteristics of some rose species in Hungary. 1.International Rosehip Conference, pp:71-78.
  10. Gümüşhane, Turkey. Kutbay HG and Kilinc M (1996). Taxonomic characteristics of rosehips (Rosa L.) and diversity in Turkey. Rosehip Symposium, 5-6 September 1996, pp. 75-83,
  11. Gumushane, Turkey. Serradilla MJ, Lozano M, Bernalte MJ, Ayuso MC, López-Corrales M and Gonz