Dergiler / Experimental Biomedical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

The effect of local anesthesia types on erectile function in TRUS biopsy: A prospective study

Sayfa
1–7
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Our study indicates that although local periprostatic anesthesia by injecting 6 ml of 2% lidocaine provides more effective anesthesia for pain relief, intrarectal 12.5g 2% lidocaine HCl gel maintains less impact on erectile dysfunction for TRUS-Bx.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: To evaluate the effect of local anesthesia types on erectile function during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (TRUS-Bx).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Between February 2014 and February 2015, 50 men who underwent TRUS-Bx at our institution were included in this prospective study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Our study indicates that although local periprostatic anesthesia by injecting 6 ml of 2% lidocaine provides more effective anesthesia for pain relief, intrarectal 12.5g 2% lidocaine HCl gel maintains less impact on erectile dysfunction for TRUS-Bx.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aim: To evaluate the effect of local anesthesia types on erectile function during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (TRUS-Bx). Methods: Between February 2014 and February 2015, 50 men who underwent TRUS-Bx at our institution were included in this prospective study. The 50 patients were randomized and divided into two groups according to the type of anesthesia used. All patients were asked to indicate the level of pain experienced on a visual analogue scale (VAS) 10 min after the TRUS biopsy. All patients had to fill in the IIEF standardized questionnaire. Groups were evaluated in terms of pre-biopsy IEFF score (IIEF-1), post-biopsy 1st month IIEF score (IIEF-2) and post-biopsy 2nd month IIEF score (IIEF -3). Patient characteristics, mean VAS score and IIEF score were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean age, IIEF-1, tPSA level, prostate volume and VAS score were 60.86±0.95 years, 18.68,6.81±0.54 ng/ml, 51.10±3.82 cc and 3.5±0.26 in all patients, respectively. The difference in VAS scores between the groups was statistically significant. In Group 1 the IIEF-1, IIEF-2, and IIEF- 3 were different from each other statistically. There was no statistically significant difference between IIEF-1 and IIEF-3 scores in group 2. So it was observed that the initial IIEF scores were reached at the end of the second month in group 2 administered 12.5 g 2% lidocaine HCl gel. Conclusion: Our study indicates that although local periprostatic anesthesia by injecting 6 ml of 2% lidocaine provides more effective anesthesia for pain relief, intrarectal 12.5g 2% lidocaine HCl gel maintains less impact on erectile dysfunction for TRUS-Bx.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİRBAŞ, A., ÖZCAN, S., YAĞLI, Ö. F., DOLUOĞLU, Ö. G., KARAGÖZ, M. A., RESORLU, B., KARAKAN, T. (2019). The effect of local anesthesia types on erectile function in TRUS biopsy: A prospective study. Experimental Biomedical Research, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 1–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/223516

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, Ghafoor A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(1):10-30. [2]Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 1989;142(1):71 -74; discussion 74-5. [3]Autorino R, De Sio M, Di Lorenzo G, Damiano R, PerdonÀ S, Cindolo L, et al. How to decrease pain during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a look at the literature. J Urol. 2005;174(6):2091-97. [4]Gustafsson O, Theorell T, Norming U, Perski A, Öhström M, Nyman C. Psychological reactions in men screened for prostate cancer. Br J Urol. 1995;75(5):631- 36. [5]Zisman A, Leibovici D, Kleinmann J, Cooper A, Siegel Y, Lindner A. The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of voiding impairment. J Urol. 2001;166(6):2242-46. [6]Chrisofos M, Papatsoris A, Dellis A, Varkarakis I, Skolarikos A, Deliveliotis C. Can prostate biopsies affect erectile function? Andrologia. 2006;38(3):79-83. [7]Akbal C, Türker P, Tavukçu HH, Şimşek F, Türkeri L. Erectile function in prostate cancer–free patients who underwent prostate saturation biopsy. Eur Urol. 2008;53(3):540-46. [8]Fujita K, Landis P, McNeil BK, Pavlovich CP. Serial prostate biopsies are associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2664-69. [9]Klein T, Palisaar RJ, Holz A, Brock M, Noldus J, Hinkel A. The impact of prostate biopsy and periprostatic nerve block on erectile and voiding function: a prospective study. J Urol. 2010;184(4):1447-52. [10] Horinaga M, Nakashima J, Nakanoma T. Efficacy compared between caudal block and periprostatic local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy. Urology. 2006;68(2):348- 51. [11] Glass A, Punnen S, Shinohara K. Local Anesthesia for the Prostate Gland, Clinical Use of Local Anesthetics, Dr. Asadolah Saadatniaki (Ed.), 2012; 59-74. ISBN: 978- 953-51-0430-8,
  2. InTech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/clinicaluse-of-local-anesthetics/local-anesthesiafor-prostate. [12] Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Peña BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11(6):319-26. [13] Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international ind