Dergiler / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Santralistanbul Campus, Bilgi University: A transformation of an industrial site to a liveable campus

Sayfa
129–143
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The converted Santralistanbul campus can be used as a good example in designing other campus conversion projects.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper focuses on the concepts of adaptive-reuse and campus urban space.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It emphasizes that application of the adaptive re-use strategy by educational institutions can contribute to acquiring available urban campus land, integrating the academic body into society, transforming the deteriorated areas, preserving an industrial heritages, and serving the university mission which ultimately generates vitality and socio-spatial sustainability.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The converted Santralistanbul campus can be used as a good example in designing other campus conversion projects.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This paper focuses on the concepts of adaptive-reuse and campus urban space. Through a case study, it explores universities’ role in the transformation of urban areas (macro-scale) and investigates the university campus as a context for spatial and social relations (micro-scale). It analyzes the Santralistanbul Campus of Bilgi University, located in the historic Peninsula in Istanbul, Turkey, as a successful example of a converted run-down industrial site to a vibrant university campus. In one hand, it studies the campus urban location, spatial organization, and design principles. On the other hand, it explores the physical features of campus which are influential in space-use patterns. The study methodology is twofold. Firstly, the historical background, existing documents, university website, and annual reports have been examined. Then, spatial analysis has followed by acquiring information from campus designers, analyzing masterplans, and Google Earth maps and OpenStreetMaps. Secondly, considering the literature, the main parameters of a good campus space have been studied. Doing so, a qualitative approach - in-situ observation, informal interviews, and questionnaire survey - have been conducted. This study highlights that there is a relationship between campus design principles and space-use patterns. It emphasizes that application of the adaptive re-use strategy by educational institutions can contribute to acquiring available urban campus land, integrating the academic body into society, transforming the deteriorated areas, preserving an industrial heritages, and serving the university mission which ultimately generates vitality and socio-spatial sustainability. The converted Santralistanbul campus can be used as a good example in designing other campus conversion projects.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

FARD, H. R. (2020). Santralistanbul Campus, Bilgi University: A transformation of an industrial site to a liveable campus. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 129–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/220165

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Abu-Ghazzeh, T. M. (1999). Com-municating Behavioral Research to Campus Design- Factors Affecting the Perception and Use of Outdoor Spaces at the University of Jordan. Environment and Behavior, 31. Appleyard, D., Lintell, M. (1972). The Environmental Quality of Streets: The Residents’ Viewpoint. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38, 84-101.
  2. Bender, Thomas, ed. (1988). The University and the City: From Medieval Origins to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Benneworth, P., Charles, D., Mada-nipour, A. (2010). Building Localized Interactions Between Universities and Cities Through University Spatial Development. European Planning Studies, Vol. 18, No. 10. Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S. Smith, G. (1993). Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers. Oxford: Butterworth-Architecture. Biddulph, M. (1999). Bringing Vitality to a Campus Environment. Urban Design International, 4 (3&4), pp. 153-166.
  4. Bilgin, I. (2010). Santralistanbul: Ar-chitectural problematics. In Workplaces: The Transformation of Places of Production. Industrialization and the Built Environment in the Islamic World. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University Press; Geneva: The Aga Khan Award for Ar-chitecture. Bott, H. (2018). City and University—An Architect’s Notes on an In-triguing Spatial Relationship. In: P. Meusburger, M. Heffernan, and L. Su-arsana (Eds.) Geographies of the University Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Caldenby, C. (2009). Universitetet og Byen – To Traditioner / The Univer-sity and The City – Two Traditions. In: M.H.S. (resp.), C. Schmidt, and H.G. (photos), eds. Campus og Studiemil-jø - fysiske rammer til morgendagens universiteter / Campus and Study Envi-ronment - physical framework for universities of the future. Copenhagen: The Danish University and Property Agen-cy under the auspices of the Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. Campos Calvo-Sotelo, P. (2005). The Journey of Utopia – The story of the first American Style Campus in Europe.Hauppauge, NY, EE.UU.: Novascience Publishers.
  5. Campos Calvo-Sotelo, P. (2014). From typological analysis to planning: modern strategies for university spatial quality. CIAN-Revista de Historia de las Universidades, 17/1 (2014), 31-58, ISSN: 1988-8503.
  6. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public Places – Urban Spaces. Oxford: Architectural Press.
  7. Chapman, M. P. (2006). American places: In search of the twenty-first cen-tury campus. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers,