KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of the Entomological Research Society / 2009 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

An efficient method for DNA extraction from preserved stoneflies (Insecta, plecoptera)

Maribet GAMBOA
Jazzmin ARRIVILLAGA
Sayfa
53–63
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This technique provides alternative DNA extraction methods for preserved stoneflies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Recent studies of ecology and taxonomy on stoneflies employed molecular sequences data based on DNA amplification used both field and museum alcohol-preserved specimens.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The absence of PCR inhibitors and the DNA quality were evaluated by PCR amplification of the mitochondrial 12S DNA gene using insects-specific primers.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This technique provides alternative DNA extraction methods for preserved stoneflies.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:ekstraksiyon · polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu · moleküler taksonomi

Abstract

Recent studies of ecology and taxonomy on stoneflies employed molecular sequences data based on DNA amplification used both field and museum alcohol-preserved specimens. In this study, we compared four different DNA extraction protocols based on preserved stoneflies specimens with SDS-Ethanol method, Phenol/Cloroform, Phenol/Chloroform/Isoamyl Alcohol method and modification of this last method to obtain best efficiency DNA extraction method. The absence of PCR inhibitors and the DNA quality were evaluated by PCR amplification of the mitochondrial 12S DNA gene using insects-specific primers. DNA extraction efficiency using method 4 is significantly higher with the highest quality >2.19 (260/280 nm) and quantity (>1370 ng/&#956;l) and significantly difference (P< 0.05) than DNA extraction efficiency using other methods. This technique provides alternative DNA extraction methods for preserved stoneflies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GAMBOA, M., ARRIVILLAGA, J. (2009). An efficient method for DNA extraction from preserved stoneflies (Insecta, plecoptera). Journal of the Entomological Research Society, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 53–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/219793

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Arrivillaga, J., Mutebi, J. P., Piñango, H., Norris D., Alexander B., Feliciangeli D., Lanzaro G., 2003, The Taxonomic Status of Genetically Divergent Populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) Based on the Distribution of Mitochondrial and Isozyme Variation. Journal of Medical Entomology, 40: 615-627.
  2. Babcock, C. S., Heraty, J. M., 2000, Molecular markers distinguishing Encarsia formosa and Encarsia luteola (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Annual Entomology of Society of America, 93(49): 738-744.
  3. Bidochka, M. J., McDonald, M. A., St Leger, R. J., Roberts, D. W., 1994, Differentiation of species and strains of entomopathogenic fungi by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Current Genetics, 25: 107-13.
  4. Cameron, S. L., Beckenbach, A. T., Dowton, M., Whiting, M. F., 2006, Evidence from mitochondrial genomics on interordinal relationships in insects. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny, 64(1): 27-34.
  5. Clark, C. G., Diamond, L. S., 1997. Intraspecific variation and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Entamoeba as revealed by riboprinting. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 44: 142-154.
  6. Clark, C. G., Cross, G. A. M., De Jonckheere, J. F., 1989. Evaluation of evolutionary divergence in the genus Naegleria by analysis of ribosomal DNA restriction enzyme patterns. Molecular Biochemical Parasitology, 34: 281-296.
  7. Clark, C. G., Martin, D. S., Diamond, L. S., 1995, Phylogenetic relationships among anuran trypanosomes as revealed by riboprinting. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 42: 92-96.
  8. Fochetti, R., 1994, Biochemical systematic and biogeographical patters of the Italian and Corsican species of the Protoneumura Corsicana species group (Plecoptera: Nemouridae). Aquatic Insects, 16(1): 1-15.
  9. Fochetti, R., Nicolai, P., 1996, The genus Taeniopteryx in Italy: biochemical and morphological data with the description of Taeniopteryx mercury n. sp. (Plecoptera: Taeniopterygidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique Suisse, 69: 95-106.
  10. Fochetti, R., Cobolli, M., Matthaeis, E., Oliverio, M., 1997, Allozyme variation in the genus Isoperla (Plecoptera; perlodidae) from Mediterranean islands, with remarks on genetic data on stoneflies. In: Landolt, P., Sartori, M. (Eds.). Ephemeroptera & Plecoptera: Biology-Ecology-Systematics. pp 476-483.
  11. Freeland, J. R., 2007, Molecular ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. 388pp. Fribourg, M. T. L., Gawel, N. J., Bartlett, A. C., 1993, Characterization of differences between whiteflies using RAPD-PCR. Insect M