KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ege Coğrafya Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the Recreational Potential of Mount Ararat National Park

Evaluation of the Recreational Potential of Mount Ağrı (Ararat) National Park

Adem YULU
Kaan KAPAN
M. Bihter BİNGÜL BULUT
Sayfa
43–56
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study can give managers useful information to plan and design recreational settings that support sustainability in the national park.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:National parks provide settings for outdoor recreational activities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:According to the analysis results, Mount Ararat was found as a high levelled outdoor recreation setting with a rate of 63% as predicted.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study can give managers useful information to plan and design recreational settings that support sustainability in the national park.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Outdoor recreation · recreation potential · Gulez Method

Özet

National parks provide settings for outdoor recreational activities. Mount Ararat is one of the well-known mountainous national parks for summit climbs and functions as a habitat variety of plants and animals in Europe. Besides its essential recreational and ecological services, the mountain has a cultural and spiritual heritage. With the growth in recreational use, decisionmakers confronted with this increasing complexity and uncertainty about keeping the park maintained sustainably. This study examines the park's recreational potential by analysing its landscape value, climatic value, accessibility, recreative convenience, and negative factor indicators to help decisionmakers make long-term plans. According to the analysis results, Mount Ararat was found as a high levelled outdoor recreation setting with a rate of 63% as predicted. Recommendations and implications were discussed. This study can give managers useful information to plan and design recreational settings that support sustainability in the national park.

Abstract

National parks provide settings for outdoor recreational activities. Mount Ararat is one of the well-known mountainous national parks for summit climbs and functions as a habitat variety of plants and animals in Europe. Besides its essential recreational and ecological services, the mountain has a cultural and spiritual heritage. With the growth in recreational use, decisionmakers confronted with this increasing complexity and uncertainty about keeping the park maintained sustainably. This study examines the park's recreational potential by analysing its landscape value, climatic value, accessibility, recreative convenience, and negative factor indicators to help decisionmakers make long-term plans. According to the analysis results, Mount Ararat was found as a high levelled outdoor recreation setting with a rate of 63% as predicted. Recommendations and implications were discussed. This study can give managers useful information to plan and design recreational settings that support sustainability in the national park.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YULU, A., KAPAN, K., BULUT, M. B. B. (2021). Evaluation of the Recreational Potential of Mount Ararat National Park. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 43–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/219104

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Azzoni, R, S., Zerboni,A., Pelfini, M,. C,A,Garzonio,. Cioni, R., Meraldi, E., Smiraglia, C., Diolaiuti, G, A. 2017. Geomorphology of Mount Ararat/Ağri Daği (Ağri Daği Milli Parki, Eastern Anatolia, Turkey), Journal of Maps, 13:2, 182-190.
  2. Balmford, A.; Green, J.M.; Anderson, M.; Beresford, J.; Huang, C.; Naidoo, R.; Walpole, M.; Manica, A. 2015. Walk on the wild side: Estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas. PLoS Biol. Berlitz, C. 1987.
  3. The Lost Ship of Noah. Putnam Press,
  4. New York. Bilgili, M. 2009. Türkiye’nin doğusunda Gemiyi ara, Ararat’ın İtibarı, İstanbul:
  5. Bilgili Ajans Yayınları.
  6. Brooks, N.1898. The Story of Marco Polo. New York: The Devinne Press.
  7. Burton, R. 1995.
  8. Travel Geography, Longman. Cırık, M. 2007. “Milli Parklar ve Uzun Devreli Gelișme Planları”, Planlama, 1, 45-50.
  9. Clavijo, R. G. 1859. Court of Timour at Samarcand (Çev: Clements R. Markham). The Hakluyt Society. Çalışkan, H., Çelik, A. 2017. “Bursa İli Mustafakemalpaşa ilçesinin peyzaj değerleri ve rekreasyon potansiyelinin belirlenmesi üzerine araştırma”, Uluslararası Turizm, Ekonomi ve İşletme Bilimleri Dergisi, 1 (2), 13-22.
  10. Çelik, A., Üzümlü, P.T., Çetin, İ. 2016. “Bursa İli Gölyazı Köyü’nün Açık Hava Rekreasyon Potansiyeli”. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Ekonomik Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (2) 32-40.
  11. Çetin, M., Sevik, H. 2016. “Evaluating the recreation potential of Ilgaz Mountain National Park in Turkey”. Environ Monit Assess 188:52. DOI 10.1007/s10661-015-5064-7.
  12. Demirkan, G.Ç., Erzurumlu, S.G. 2020. “According to method of Gülez determination of recreational potential of Niğde Atatürk City Forest.” Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research. 7(52), 986-995.
  13. Doğanay, H. 2003. “Ağrı Dağı ve Turistik Önemi”, Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 9, 171-179.
  14. Gül, A., Örücü, M.K., Karaca. Ö. 2006. ‘An Approach for Recreation Suitability Analysis to Recreation Planning in Gölcük Nature Park’. Environmental Management 37, 606–625. Gülez S.,1990. Orman İçi Rekreasyon Potansiyelinin Saptanması İçin Geliştirilen Bir Değerlendirme Yöntemi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Seri: A, 40 (2): 132–148.
  15. Gülez, S.1992. A Method for Evaluating Areas for Natural Park Status, Environmental Management 16(6), 811-818.
  16. Hall, C. M., Page, S. 2010. The Contribution of Neil Leiper to Tourism Studies. Current Issues in Tourism 13, 299-309.
  17. Hall, M, C., Page S, J. 2006. “The Geography of Tourism and Recreation, Environtment, Place and Space”. Routledge: London and New York. Hong, J. 2014. Stud