KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL) / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

When the demand for educational research meet practice

Anette FORSSTEN SEİSER
Sayfa
348–376
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The research questions are as follows: 1) How do the principals understand and realise the demand of an enhanced scientific foundation in their schools? 2) What happens when a group of principals and a researcher enters a partnership? 3) What practice architecture affect the partnership between the principals and the researcher? 4) What practice architecture affect the principals leadership actions in their schools?

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The objective in this article is to explore how this demand can emerge in an action research project as well as in school principals’ daily life.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The theory of practice architectures (Kemmis & Grootenboer, 2008) is used as an analytical framing.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The research questions are as follows: 1) How do the principals understand and realise the demand of an enhanced scientific foundation in their schools? 2) What happens when a group of principals and a researcher enters a partnership? 3) What practice architecture affect the partnership between the principals and the researcher? 4) What practice architecture affect the principals leadership actions in their schools?
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Practice arhitectures · principal · demand

Abstract

The objective in this article is to explore how this demand can emerge in an action research project as well as in school principals’ daily life. This is done in form of a case study were a group of principals enters a partnership with a researcher in their quest to apply a scientific approach in their own and, in their teachers’ professions. This study provide a pertinent example of how a this demand can emerge in practice. The theory of practice architectures (Kemmis & Grootenboer, 2008) is used as an analytical framing. The research questions are as follows: 1) How do the principals understand and realise the demand of an enhanced scientific foundation in their schools? 2) What happens when a group of principals and a researcher enters a partnership? 3) What practice architecture affect the partnership between the principals and the researcher? 4) What practice architecture affect the principals leadership actions in their schools?

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SEİSER, A. F. (2021). When the demand for educational research meet practice. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL), Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 348–376. https://ajindex.com/articles/218104

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Anderson, G. L., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28 (5), 12-21
  2. Alvesson, M. (2013). Organisation och ledning: ett något skeptiskt perspektiv. [Organization and leadership: a rather sceptical perspective] Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur. Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012) Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human relations, 65(3), 367-390
  3. Biesta, G. (2019). Reclaiming teaching for teachers education: Towards a spiral curriculum. Beijing international review of education (1), 259-272
  4. Bridges, D., & Jonathan, R. (2008). Education and the market. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education (pp. 126–145).
  5. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education knowledge and action research. London, UK: Falmer Press.
  6. Carr, W. (2009). Practice without theory? A postmodern perspective on educational practice. In B. Green (red.), Understanding and researching professio0nal practice (pp. 55-64). Netherlands: Rotterdam: Sense Publisher Crossouard, B., & Pryor, J. (2012). How theory matters: Formative assessment theory and practices and their different relations to education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(3), 251–263.
  7. Flygare, E., Frånberg, G.-M., Gill, P., Johansson, B., Lindberg, O., Osbeck, C., & Söderström, Å. (2011). Utvärdering av metoder mot mobbning. [Evaluation of methods against bullying] Stockholm, Sweden: Skolverket. Forssten Seiser, A., & Karlefjärd, A. (2014). Aktionsforskning som förhållningssätt i en föränderlig omvärld. KAPET, [Action research as an approach in a changing environment] 10, 58–73.
  8. Forssten Seiser, A. (2017). Stärkt pedagogiskt ledarskap. Rektorer granskar sin egen praktik. Doctoral thesis. Karlstad: Karlstads University Forssten Seiser, A. (2019). Exploring enhanced pedagogical leadership: an action research study involving Swedish principals. Educational Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.165666
  9. Gunter, H., & Ribbins, P. (2003). Challenging orthodoxy in school leadership studies: Knowers, knowing and knowledge? School Leadership and Management, 23(2), 129–147.
  10. Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  11. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. London, UK: Polity. Hirsh,