Dergiler / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

VIEWS OF PRESCHOOL TEACHERS ON USING OUT-OF-SCHOOL LEARNINGENVIRONMENTS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION

Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
1225–1249
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the research, some recommendations were made based on the results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of research was to reveal the views of preschool teachers on using out-of-school learning environments in preschool education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It was a qualitative research conducted by phenomenological method and eleven preschool teachers from Turkey were included in it.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the research, some recommendations were made based on the results.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of research was to reveal the views of preschool teachers on using out-of-school learning environments in preschool education. It was a qualitative research conducted by phenomenological method and eleven preschool teachers from Turkey were included in it. The research data was obtained by interview and the interview form prepared by the researcher was used in the interviews. The data was analyzed by using descriptive and content analysis techniques. The findings revealed that preschool teachers described the out-of-school learning concept in compliance with the literature as the ‘learning performed anywhere out of classroom/school’. It was considered that out-of-school learning environments had advantages for children in developmental, cognitive and social-emotional terms and for teachers in terms of education processes, vocational and personal development. However, these environments had disadvantages for children in safety, social-emotional, development and in environmentrelated terms and for teachers in process-related and social-emotional terms. The teachers stated that environment, parent, teacher-based problems and safety problems were experienced in the activities performed in these environments. It was determined that the teachers mostly did not consider themselves competitive in conducting activities in these environments due to the lack of knowledge and experience. In the research, some recommendations were made based on the results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ULUDAĞ, G. (2022). VIEWS OF PRESCHOOL TEACHERS ON USING OUT-OF-SCHOOL LEARNINGENVIRONMENTS IN PRESCHOOL EDUCATION. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 1225–1249. https://ajindex.com/articles/21799

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Alleman, J., & Brophy, J. (1994). Taking advantage of out-of-school opportunities for meaningful social studies learning. Journal the Social Studies, 85(6), 262-267.
  2. Anagün, Ş. S. (2013). Görüşme [Interview]. In S. Baştürk (Ed.), Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (pp. 299-326). Ankara:
  3. Vize Publishing. Aslan. A. (2019). Out-of-school learning environments activities: Case of Trabzon. Paper presented at the I. International Congress on Informal Learning, Turkey, November 1-3.
  4. Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A Review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235- 245. Beiers, R. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (1992). Learning in interactive science centers. Research in Science Education, 22, 38-44.
  5. Bowers, B. (2012). A look at early childhood programming in museums. Journal of Museum Education, 37(1), 39-47. doi: 10.1080/10598650.2012.11510716 Bowden, J. A., & Walsh, E. (2000). Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT Press.
  6. Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Toward a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1388.
  7. Büyükkaynak, E., Ok, Z., & Aslan, O. (2016). Science teachers’ views on out-of-school learning environments in science education. Kafkas University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, Additional Issue (1), 43-60.
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2019). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods in education] (27th ed.). Ankara:
  9. Pegem Academy Publishing. Cameron, R., & Harrison, J. L. (2012). The interrelatedness of formal, non-formal and informal learning: Evidence from labour market program participants. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 52(2), 277-309.
  10. Campbell, C., & Howitt, C. (2015). Science in early childhood. In C. Campbell, W. Jobling, & C. Howitt (Eds.), The place of science in the early years (pp.7-13). Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Chan, H. W. (2016).
  12. Popular culture, English out-of-class activities, and learner autonomy among highly proficient secondary students in Hong Kong. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8), 1918-1923.
  13. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods design, and analysis. (12th ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited. Çepni, O., & Aydın, F. (2015). Social sciences teachers’ views on out-of-classro