Dergiler / Birey ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

SOCİAL AND POLİTİCAL (THE OTHERS) EXCLUSİONS WİTHİN THE POST-YUGOSLAV ETHNONATİONAL İNSTİTUTİONALİZATİON İN BOSNİA AND HERZEGOVİNA

Sayfa
171–196
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

More critical insight should be recognized as feminist theoretically significant to studying the phenomenon.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The paper analyzes the concepts, causes, and normative solutions of social and political exclusions in Bosnia and Herzegovina within post-Yugoslavia's ethnonationalism paradigm and the Dayton Constitution.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:War, post-war neoliberalism produced economic destitution and social exclusions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:More critical insight should be recognized as feminist theoretically significant to studying the phenomenon.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:former-Yugoslavia · Bosnia and Herzegovina · ethnonationalism

Özet

The paper analyzes the concepts, causes, and normative solutions of social and political exclusions in Bosnia and Herzegovina within post-Yugoslavia's ethnonationalism paradigm and the Dayton Constitution. War, post-war neoliberalism produced economic destitution and social exclusions. Along with the clerical, ethnonationalism showed diligence as the primary determinant of patriotism, advocating the ideology of exclusion. The radicalization of certain groups became acceptable, as they would stand for homogenous countries. Lack of efficient form with a professional and robust government capable of making autonomous reforms in the economy and social spheres influences phenomena. B&H's imposed ethnopolitical concept of "constituent peoples" rigidly removes the civic order, the citizen ideal, rights, and freedoms, decreasing political collectivism. The Dayton patterned ethnic-religious exclusivism and the unconstitutional "hybrid" identities. By ethnoreligious criteria, three groups of citizens are given the right to make decisions, generating political representation issues for the "Others." Although they do not represent a homogeneous group, they have the right to recognize their human rights. With a revised notion (national minorities, non-nationals, Bosnians), "Others" would be given the right to be represented in all state institutions, thus eliminating discrimination. Participation in the state's formation would reduce their unconstitutionality - decision-making process. The true expression of national freedom lies in the richness of human nature instead of the violent rigidity of ethnonationalism reserve. Overcoming sociopolitical exclusions and the economic necessity by systemic institutional transformation and EU political integration is demanding. "Two schools under one roof" model negates emancipation's educational process proclaiming systemic exclusion and ethnoreligious discrimination, amplifying security stalemate. Social status and stigma of trafficking-exploitation victims in sociolegal frameworks have substantial victimization dynamics consequences. More critical insight should be recognized as feminist theoretically significant to studying the phenomenon.

Abstract

The paper analyzes the concepts, causes, and normative solutions of social and political exclusions in Bosnia and Herzegovina within post-Yugoslavia's ethnonationalism paradigm and the Dayton Constitution. War, post-war neoliberalism produced economic destitution and social exclusions. Along with the clerical, ethnonationalism showed diligence as the primary determinant of patriotism, advocating the ideology of exclusion. The radicalization of certain groups became acceptable, as they would stand for homogenous countries. Lack of efficient form with a professional and robust government capable of making autonomous reforms in the economy and social spheres influences phenomena. B&H's imposed ethnopolitical concept of "constituent peoples" rigidly removes the civic order, the citizen ideal, rights, and freedoms, decreasing political collectivism. The Dayton patterned ethnic-religious exclusivism and the unconstitutional "hybrid" identities. By ethnoreligious criteria, three groups of citizens are given the right to make decisions, generating political representation issues for the "Others." Although they do not represent a homogeneous group, they have the right to recognize their human rights. With a revised notion (national minorities, non-nationals, Bosnians), "Others" would be given the right to be represented in all state institutions, thus eliminating discrimination. Participation in the state's formation would reduce their unconstitutionality - decision-making process. The true expression of national freedom lies in the richness of human nature instead of the violent rigidity of ethnonationalism reserve. Overcoming sociopolitical exclusions and the economic necessity by systemic institutional transformation and EU political integration is demanding. "Two schools under one roof" model negates emancipation's educational process proclaiming systemic exclusion and ethnoreligious discrimination, amplifying security stalemate. Social status and stigma of trafficking-exploitation victims in sociolegal frameworks have substantial victimization dynamics consequences. More critical insight should be recognized as feminist theoretically significant to studying the phenomenon.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HADŽİĆ, F. (2021). SOCİAL AND POLİTİCAL (THE OTHERS) EXCLUSİONS WİTHİN THE POST-YUGOSLAV ETHNONATİONAL İNSTİTUTİONALİZATİON İN BOSNİA AND HERZEGOVİNA. Birey ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 171–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/217866

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Eurostat, Migration and migrant population statistics (2017), available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20190321-1
  2. Unicef Annual Report (2016), available at https://www.unicef.org/media/49126/file/2016arr_health.pdf Hadžić, F. (2020) The European Union (EU) Political Identity within the migrant crisis, and the Balkan – Bosnian route; xenophobia and religious identity. Research, Society and Development, 9(10), pp. 1-29. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8685 Hadžić, F. (2020). The political psychology of extremism; “naturalness” of the phenomenon in the Western Balkans. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 11(1), pp. 250-267. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v11i1.1519 Išerič, H. (2019) Judgments of the European Court for Human Rights in Cases Sejdić and Finci, Zornić, Šlaku and Pilav – nudum ius in BiH, available at http://www.fcjp.ba/analize/Harun_Iseric-Presude_ESLJP_Sejdic_i_Finci,_Zornic,_Pilav_i_Slaku%E2%80%93nudum_ius_u_BiH.pdf Statistical Yearbook of SR Bosnia and Herzegovina, (1991) Republic Statistical Office, available at http://www.bhas.ba/?lang=en Perspektiva, (2015) Radio Free Europe in cooperation with The National Endowment for Democracy, TV-series Transparency International Anual Report, (2018), available at https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/bosnia-and-herzegovina https://www.dw.com/bs/egzodus-iz-bosne-i-hercegovine/a-49486241, (2019), page accessed 20.10.2020. World Bank, (2010) Quantitative analysis of the on economic mobility, labor market, and gender issues in B&H, available at http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/754241467992483659/pdf/97640-ESW-P132666-and-P152786-Box385353B-PUBLIC-BiH-Gender-Disparities-in-Endowments.pdf UNDP,(2009) Legal Empowerment of the Poor and the Elimination of Poverty, available at https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/reports/Legal%20empowerment%20of%20the%20poor.pdf
  3. Woodward, S. (2010)Varieties of State-Building in the Balkans: A Case for Shifting Focus, available at https://www.berghoffoundation.org/fileadmin/redaktion/Publications/Handbook/Articles/woodward_handbook.pdf Papić, Ž. (2002)
  4. Bosnia and the Balkans, Opportunities and Conditions for Recovery, Forum Bosna / e, Sarajevo, Vol. 17/02 Hadžić, F. (2020) The Politicization of Religion and the Sacralized Balkan Nations Regarding Bosnia and Herzegovina, Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe, Vol. 40, Iss. 7, Article 8, pp. 1-27
  5. Arcel, L.,Popovic, S.,Kucukalic,A., Mehmedbasic, A.,& Ljubotina,D. (2003