Dergiler / Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Tourism Promises Expressed during Election Campaigns and the Relevant Actions Taken After the General Elections

Sayfa
1414–1436
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It has been established that governments led by the Motherland Party (MP) and later, the Justice and Development Party (JDP) did more to develop tourism than any other government.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The present study concerns itself with the promises regarding tourism, expressed by political parties in their party programs or elections manifestos, as well the bills made into laws by the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (GNAT).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study demonstrates that political parties began to attach importance to tourism after the general election of 1983.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It has been established that governments led by the Motherland Party (MP) and later, the Justice and Development Party (JDP) did more to develop tourism than any other government.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The present study concerns itself with the promises regarding tourism, expressed by political parties in their party programs or elections manifestos, as well the bills made into laws by the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (GNAT). Tourism revenues recorded after the general elections, and the relevant actions taken by political parties have been studied. In this study, literature was reviewed. And then data on the promises of political parties and their post-election activities were collected from the sources kept in the archives of the GNAT located in Ankara. Further, Information on tourism-related developments was accessed through the Ministry of Culture and Tourism and the Five Year Development Plans. In this context, the data was evaluated and the study was concluded. The study demonstrates that political parties began to attach importance to tourism after the general election of 1983. It has been observed that the parties underlined their promise to further develop tourism. However national and international crises had negative impact on tourism. These crises prevented political parties from reaching their goals. It has been concluded that the primary objective in developing tourism was to make contributions to the country’s economy. It has been established that governments led by the Motherland Party (MP) and later, the Justice and Development Party (JDP) did more to develop tourism than any other government.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERKMEN, A., AKIN, A., AKIN, A. (2019). Tourism Promises Expressed during Election Campaigns and the Relevant Actions Taken After the General Elections. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 1414–1436. https://ajindex.com/articles/215547

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Aktüel, 2002.
  2. Seçmenin El Kitabı, Bütün Partilerin Seçim Bildirgeleri, TBMM Kütüphanesi, Ankara.(AktüelMagazine, 2002. Voter’s handbook; election manifestos of all parties. ) Demokratik Sol Parti 1999 Seçim Bildirgesi, 1999. (DLP, 1999.Democratic Left Party 1999 election bulletin). Erkmen A. (2017). Türkiye’de Siyasi Partilerin Genel Seçim Propagandaları ve Seçim Sonrası Faaliyetleri (1983- 2007), (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dalı, Kahramanmaraş.(Erkmen, A. 2017.Political parties’ general election propaganda and postelection activities in Turkey (1983-2007), (PhD Dissertation), KahramanmaraşSütçü İmam University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of History, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.) (GNAT, Grand National Assembly of Turkey, Parliament Reports 2003. 22nd Term, 8th Volume, 1st Legislative Year, 52nd Assembly, GNAT Printing House, Ankara. (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi Tutanak Dergisi, 2003. 22. Dönem, 8. C., 1. Yasama Yılı, 52. Bileşim, TBMM Matbaası, Ankara). GNAT,1995.Grand National Assembly of Turkey Parliament bulletin.40: 1-30.(Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Meclis Bülteni, 1995, S.40, 1-30). GNAT,1997.Grand National Assembly of Turkey Parliament bulletin, 57:1-44. (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Meclis Bülteni, 1997, S. 57,1-44). GNAT,1999.Grand National Assembly of Turkey Parliament bulletin,72: 1-24. (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Meclis Bülteni, 1997, S. 57,1-44). GNAT, 2004.Grand National Assembly of Turkey Parliament bulletin, 103:1-50. (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Meclis Bülteni, 2004, S. 103, 1-50). GNAT,2004.Grand National Assembly of Turkey Parliament bulletin, 108: 1-49. (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Meclis Bülteni, 2004, S. 108, 1-49). GNAT,2004.Grand National Assembly of Turkey Parliament bulletin, 110: 1-65.(Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Meclis Bülteni, 2004, S. 110, 1-65). GNAT,2005.Grand National Assembly of Turkey Parliament bulletin, 119: 1-76.(Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Meclis Bülteni, 2005, S. 119, 1-76). GNAT,2007.Grand National Assembly of Turkey Parliament bulletin,138: 1-72.(Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Meclis Bülteni, 2007, S. 138, 1-72). GNAT, 2007.Grand National Assembly of Turkey Parliament bulletin, 139: 1-73.(Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Meclis Bülteni, 2007, S. 139, 1-73). GNAT,2008.Grand National Assembly of Turkey Parliament bulletin, 145: 1-61.(Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Meclis Bülteni, 2008, S.145, 1-61). GNAT, 2009.Grand Nati