KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Diagnostic Efficacy of Signal Intensity Ratio and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements in Differentiating Cerebellopontine Angle Meningioma and Schwannoma

Mustafa BOZDAĞ
Ali ER
Sümeyye EKMEKÇİ
Sayfa
281–288
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: While both ADC and SIR values are useful in differentiating between VS and meningioma, ADC values have higher diagnostic efficacy compared to SIR.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To investigate the efficacy of Signal Intensity Ratio (SIR) measurements of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values of ADC mapping in the differentiation of schwannomas and meningiomas originating from the CPA.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: A total of 30 patients who were pathologically diagnosed (16 meningiomas, 14 VS) were included in this retrospective study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: While both ADC and SIR values are useful in differentiating between VS and meningioma, ADC values have higher diagnostic efficacy compared to SIR.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of Signal Intensity Ratio (SIR) measurements of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values of ADC mapping in the differentiation of schwannomas and meningiomas originating from the CPA. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 patients who were pathologically diagnosed (16 meningiomas, 14 VS) were included in this retrospective study. SIR was calculated by proportioning regions of interests (ROIs) measurements of solid regions of the tumor and occipital subcutaneous adipose tissue in T2WI. In ADC maps, ADCmin and ADCmean values were obtained by placing ROIs inside the solid parts of the tumor. Groups were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, independent- sample t-test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, and Pearson correlation test. Results: SIR, ADCmean, and ADCmin values were 0.61±0.08, 0.858±0.101x10–3 mm2/s, 0.815±0.099x10–3 mm2/s for meningioma group; and 0.80±0.12, 1.272±0.148x10–3 mm2/s, 1.232±0.148x10–3 mm2/s for VS group, respectively. These parameters were statistically lower in the meningioma group compared to the VS group (p<0.001 for all). A positive correlation was observed between SIR and ADC values among the total group (r=0.694, p<0.001 for both). ROC analysis showed that the diagnostic performance of ADC parameters was better than the SIR parameter in differentiating meningioma from VS. The cut-off values in differentiating meningioma and VS were determined as 1.027x10–3 mm2/s for ADCmean and 0.980x10–3 mm2/s for ADCmin with 100% sensitivity. Conclusion: While both ADC and SIR values are useful in differentiating between VS and meningioma, ADC values have higher diagnostic efficacy compared to SIR.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOZDAĞ, M., ER, A., EKMEKÇİ, S. (2020). Diagnostic Efficacy of Signal Intensity Ratio and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements in Differentiating Cerebellopontine Angle Meningioma and Schwannoma. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 281–288. https://ajindex.com/articles/214767

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Nakamura M, Roser F, Dormiani M, Matthies C, Vorkapic P, Samii M. Facial and cochlear nerve function after surgery of cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2005; 57(1): 77–90
  2. Chen AF, Samy RN, Gantz BJ. Cerebellopontine angle tumor composed of Schwann and meningeal proliferations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 127(11): 1385–9
  3. Robertson JT, Coakham HB, Robertson JH. Nerve Sheath Tumors. Chapter 27. Cranial Base Surgery. Churchill Livingstone; 2000.p.485– 501
  4. Martuza RL, Ojemann RG. Bilateral acoustic neuromas: clinical aspects, pathogenesis, and treatment. Neurosurgery 1982; 10(1): 1–12
  5. Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): surgical management and results with an emphasis on complications and how to avoid them. Neurosurgery 1997; 40(1): 11–23
  6. Mallucci CL, Ward V, Carney AS, O’Donoghue GM, Robertson I. Clinical features and outcomes in patients with non-acoustic cerebellopontine angle tumours. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 66(6): 768–71
  7. Skolnik AD, Loevner LA, Sampathu DM, Newman JG, Lee JY, Bagley LJ, et al. Cranial Nerve Schwannomas: Diagnostic Imaging Approach. Radiographics 2016; 36(5): 1463–77
  8. Watts J, Box G, Galvin A, Brotchie P, Trost N, Sutherland T. Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2014; 5(1): 113–22
  9. Chilla GS, Tan CH, Xu C, Poh CL. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its recent trend-a survey. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2015; 5(3): 407–22
  10. Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188(6): 1622–35
  11. Chen L, Liu M, Bao J, Xia Y, Zhang J, Zhang L, et al. The correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity in patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8(11): e79008
  12. Surov A, Ginat DT, Sanverdi E, Lim CCT, Hakyemez B, Yogi A, et al. Use of diffusion weighted imaging in differentiating between malignant and benign meningiomas. A multicenter analysis. World Neurosurg 2016; 88: 598–602
  13. Kono K, Inoue Y, Nakayama K, Shakudo M, Morino M, Ohata K, et al. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22(6): 1081–8
  14. Lee EJ, terBrugge K, Mikulis D, Choi DS, Bae JM, Lee SK, et al. Diagnostic value of peritumoral minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from solitary metastatic lesions.