Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2006 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Contribution to the Taxonomical and Biological Characteristics of Sciurus anomalus in Turkey (Mammalia: Rodentia)

Sayfa
111–116
Yayın Tarihi
2006-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The specimens were discussed at the subspecies level, comparing to the relevant literature, and it was concluded that our specimens represent the nominate form.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study is based on 62 Sciurus anomalus specimens obtained from Konya, Karaman, Kütahya and Çorum provinces between 1997 and 2002.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this species, the chromosome number (2n) is 40.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The specimens were discussed at the subspecies level, comparing to the relevant literature, and it was concluded that our specimens represent the nominate form.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2002 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Sciurus anomalus · taxonomy · biology

Özet

This study is based on 62 Sciurus anomalus specimens obtained from Konya, Karaman, Kütahya and Çorum provinces between 1997 and 2002. Some ecological and biological features of the species, including habitat, nest-sites, fur colour, baculum and phallus were investigated. In this species, the chromosome number (2n) is 40. For the taxonomical evaluation of Sciurus anomalus, morphometric data of the specimens were used. The specimens were discussed at the subspecies level, comparing to the relevant literature, and it was concluded that our specimens represent the nominate form.

Abstract

This study is based on 62 Sciurus anomalus specimens obtained from Konya, Karaman, Kütahya and Çorum provinces between 1997 and 2002. Some ecological and biological features of the species, including habitat, nest-sites, fur colour, baculum and phallus were investigated. In this species, the chromosome number (2n) is 40. For the taxonomical evaluation of Sciurus anomalus, morphometric data of the specimens were used. The specimens were discussed at the subspecies level, comparing to the relevant literature, and it was concluded that our specimens represent the nominate form.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALBAYRAK, İ., ARSLAN, A. (2006). Contribution to the Taxonomical and Biological Characteristics of Sciurus anomalus in Turkey (Mammalia: Rodentia). Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 111–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/214314

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Aklan, B. 1965. Türkiye’nin Bitki Zararlısı Çift Tırnaklı Hayvanları (Mammalia: Artiodactyla) Faunası Üzerine İlk Arafltırmalar. Ankara Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Yıllığı 15: 103-119.
  2. Bobrinskiy, H.L., Kuznetzov, B.A. and Kusyakin, A.P. 1965. Identification of Mammals of Soviet Socialist Russia, Moscow. Brink, F.H. Van Den, 1956. Die Säugetiere Europas. Paul Parey Hamburg, Berlin. Corbet, G.B. 1978. The Mammals of the Palaearctic Region: A Taxonomic Review. British Museum (Natural History), Cornell University Press,
  3. London. Ellerman, J.R. 1948. Key to the rodents of south-west Asia in the British Museum collection. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 118: 765- 816. Felten, H., Spitzenberger, F. and Storch, G. 1997. Zur Kleinsaeuger- Fauna West-Anatolien. Teil 1. Senck. biol., Frankfurt 52: 393- 424. Galvish, L. and Gurnell, J. 1999. Sciurus anomalus. In: The Atlas of European Mammals (eds. A.J. Mitchell-Jones, G. Amori, W., Bogdanowiez, B. Krystufek, P.J.H. Reijnders, F. Spitzenberger, M. Stubbe, J.B.M. Thissen, V. Vohohralik, J. Zima), Poyser Natural History, London, pp. 176-177.
  4. Harrison, D.J. and Bates, J.J. 1991. The mammals of Arabia. Second Edition,
  5. Sevenoaks, Kent, Harrison Zoological Museum, England. Hoffmann, R.S., Anderson, C.G., Thorington, R.W. and Heaney, L.R. 1993. Family Sciuridae. In: Mammals Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (eds. E.Wilson, D.M.Reeder), London, p. 439. Lidicker, W. Z. 1968. A phylogeny of New Guinea rodent genera based on phallic morphology. J. Mamm. 49: 610-643.
  6. Misonne, X. 1957. Mammiferes de la Turquie Sud-orientale et du nord de la Syrie. Mammalia 21: 53-67.
  7. Mursaloğlu, B. 1964. Türkiye’nin Azalan Memeli Hayvanları Hakkında ‘The Decrease of Wild Mammals in Turkey’. Türk Biol. Derg. 14: 65-70.
  8. Mursaloğlu, B. 1973. New Records for Turkish Rodents (Mammalia). Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ankara, Seri C 17: 213-219.
  9. Osborn, D. J. 1964.
  10. The Hare, Porcupine, Beaver, Squirells, Jerboas, and Dormice of Turkey. J. Mamm. 28: 573-592.
  11. Özkan, B. 1999. Gökçeada ve Bozcaada Kemirici Faunası (Mammalia: Rodentia). Doğa, Tr. J. of Zoology 23: 133-147.
  12. Patton, J.L. 1967. Chromosomes studies of certain pocket mice, genus Pregronathus (Rodentia: Heteromyidae). J. Mamm. 48: 27-32.