Dergiler / Electrica / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

An Insight into the Impact of Solar and Wind Powers’ Probability Distributions on Distribution Network Investments

Sayfa
52–61
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, the probability distribution of a different generation technology exerts a significant impact on the investment results of DNP.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:With the introduction of renewable generators, the investment challenges have also increased recently because of the associated stochastic behaviors.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The following six cases are considered: the 1) integration of only WPPs considering one scenario of load, wind, and solar powers, 2) integration of only WPPs considering four scenarios, 3) integration of only SPPs considering one scenario, 4) integration of only SPPs considering four scenarios, 5) integration of both WPPs and SPPs considering one scenario, and 6) integration of both WPPs and SPPs considering four scenarios.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, the probability distribution of a different generation technology exerts a significant impact on the investment results of DNP.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

With the introduction of renewable generators, the investment challenges have also increased recently because of the associated stochastic behaviors. Their impacts in terms of the investment related to the distribution network could be different depending on the probability distribution of the corresponding renewable generators, historical-data modeling, and network structure. Therefore, the impacts of the probability distributions of wind power plants (WPPs) and solar power plants (SPPs) are analyzed thoroughly for different case studies by using a convolution-based distribution network planning (DNP) model. The following six cases are considered: the 1) integration of only WPPs considering one scenario of load, wind, and solar powers, 2) integration of only WPPs considering four scenarios, 3) integration of only SPPs considering one scenario, 4) integration of only SPPs considering four scenarios, 5) integration of both WPPs and SPPs considering one scenario, and 6) integration of both WPPs and SPPs considering four scenarios. The results show that considering the four scenarios is more suitable for a risk-averse approach planning, as the chance constraints are formulated separately for all the scenarios. However, the probability distribution of a different generation technology exerts a significant impact on the investment results of DNP.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UGRANLI, F. (2020). An Insight into the Impact of Solar and Wind Powers’ Probability Distributions on Distribution Network Investments. Electrica, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 52–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/213419

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. P. S. Georgilakis, N. D. Hatziargyriou, "A review of power distribution planning in the modern power systems era: Models, methods and future research", Electr Power Syst Res, vol. 121, pp. 89-100, 2015. [CrossRef] 2. A. Garry, F. Cadoux, M. C. Alvarez-Herault, N. Hadjsaid, "Risk aversion model of distribution network planning rules considering distributed generation curtailment", Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, vol. 99, pp. 385-393, 2018. [CrossRef] 3. L. Zhao, Y. Huang, Q. Dai, L. Yang, F. Chen, L. Wang, K. Sun, J. Huang, Z. Lin, "Multistage active distribution network planning with restricted operation scenario selection", IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 121067-80, 2019. [CrossRef] 4. A. Rastgou, S. Bahramara, J. Moshtagh, "Flexible and robust distribution network expansion planning in the presence of distributed generators", Int Trans Electr Energy Syst, vol. 28, pp. 1-26, 2018. [CrossRef] 5. M. Wu, L. Kou, X. Hou, Y. Ji, B. Xu, H. Gao, "A bi-level robust planning model for active distribution networks considering uncertainties of renewable energies", Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, vol. 105, pp. 814-22, 2019. [CrossRef] 6. R. Hemmati, R. A. Hooshmand, N. Taheri, "Distribution network expansion planning and DG placement in the presence of uncertainties", Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, vol. 73, pp. 665-73, 2015. [CrossRef] 7. A. Soroudi, M. Ehsan, R. Caire, N. Hadjsaid, "Hybrid immune-genetic algorithm method for benefit maximisation of distribution network operators and distributed generation owners in a deregulated environment", IET Gener Transm Distrib, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 961-72, 2011. [CrossRef] 8. H. Yu, C. Y. Chung, K. P. Wong, J. H. Zhang, "A chance constrained transmission network expansion planning method with consideration of load and wind farm uncertainties", IEEE Trans Power Syst, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1568-76, 2009. [CrossRef] 9. P. Salyani, J. Salehi, F. Samadi Gazijahani, "Chance constrained simultaneous optimization of substations, feeders, renewable and non-renewable distributed generations in distribution network", Electr Power Syst Res, vol. 158, pp. 56-69, 2018. [CrossRef] 10. A. Bagheri, H. Monsef, H. Lesani, "Integrated distribution network expansion planning incorporating distributed generation considering uncertainties, reliability, and operational conditions", Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, vol. 73, pp. 56-70, 2015. [CrossRef] 11. B. Qi, J. Chen, Y. Zhao, P. Jiao, "Expectation-maximisation model for stochastic distribution network pl