Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale

Sayfa
996–1001
Yayın Tarihi
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Convergent-divergent and known-groups validity and reliability were established for the Turkish version of the University of Toronto AFSS.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:There are various instruments to assess quality of life (QoL) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: The AFSS and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were completed by 130 patients with documented AF.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Convergent-divergent and known-groups validity and reliability were established for the Turkish version of the University of Toronto AFSS.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Atrial fibrillation · health-related quality of life · validation

Özet

There are various instruments to assess quality of life (QoL) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS). Materials and methods: The AFSS and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were completed by 130 patients with documented AF. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society Severity in Atrial Fibrillation (SAF) scale and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) scale were also utilized by the attending physicians. To assess test-retest reliability, the AFSS was readministered to 47 clinically stable patients at a 1-month follow-up visit. Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reproducibility, and construct validity were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the patients was 63.1 ± 10.9 years and 58.5% of patients were male. The outcome scores of the Turkish version of the AFSS showed good correlations with theoretically related SF-36 domains. Additionally, AFSS outcome scores showed a linear correlation with the SAF and EHRA scores. Cronbach's alpha values for internal consistency were consistent and similar with the English language version of the AFSS. Intraclass correlation coefficients for reproducibility exceeded 0.80 for every item. Conclusion: Convergent-divergent and known-groups validity and reliability were established for the Turkish version of the University of Toronto AFSS.

Abstract

There are various instruments to assess quality of life (QoL) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS). Materials and methods: The AFSS and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were completed by 130 patients with documented AF. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society Severity in Atrial Fibrillation (SAF) scale and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) scale were also utilized by the attending physicians. To assess test-retest reliability, the AFSS was readministered to 47 clinically stable patients at a 1-month follow-up visit. Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reproducibility, and construct validity were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the patients was 63.1 ± 10.9 years and 58.5% of patients were male. The outcome scores of the Turkish version of the AFSS showed good correlations with theoretically related SF-36 domains. Additionally, AFSS outcome scores showed a linear correlation with the SAF and EHRA scores. Cronbach's alpha values for internal consistency were consistent and similar with the English language version of the AFSS. Intraclass correlation coefficients for reproducibility exceeded 0.80 for every item. Conclusion: Convergent-divergent and known-groups validity and reliability were established for the Turkish version of the University of Toronto AFSS.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EREN, N. K., TÜLÜCE, S. Y., KILIÇASLAN, B., NAZLI, C., ERGENE, O. (2014). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6, 996–1001. https://ajindex.com/articles/212940

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. European Heart Rhythm Association; European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, Van Gelder IC, Al-Attar N et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2369–2429.
  2. Reynolds MR, Ellis E, Zimetbaum P. Quality of life in atrial fibrillation: measurement tools and impact of interventions. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008; 19: 762–768. AFFIRM Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1825–1833. Oldridge N. Assessing health-related quality of life: is it important when evaluation the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation? J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2003; 23: 26–28.
  3. Maglio C, Sra J, Paquette M, Dorian P, Bygrave A, Wood K, Ayers GM. Measuring quality of life and symptom severity in patients with atrial fibrillation. PACE 1998; 21: 839. Dorian P, Jung W, Newman D, Paquette M, Wood K, Ayers GM, Camm J, Akhtar M, Luderitz B. The impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation: implications for the assessment of investigational therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1303–1309.
  4. Dorian P, Paquette M, Newman D, Green M, Connolly SJ, Talajic M, Roy D. Quality of life improves with treatment in the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation. Am Heart J 2002; 143: 984–990.
  5. Dorian P, Guerra PG, Kerr CR, O’Donnell SS, Crystal E, Gillis AM, Mitchell LB, Roy D, Skanes AC, Rose MS et al. Validation of a new simple scale to measure symptoms in atrial fibrillation: the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Severity in Atrial Fibrillation scale. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009; 2: 218–224.
  6. Kirchhof P, Auricchio A, Bax J, Crijns H, Camm J, Diener HC, Goette A, Hindricks G, Hohnloser S, Kappenberger L et al. Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork and the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace 2007; 9: 1006– 1023. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483.
  7. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Fisek G, Ölmez N, Memiş A. The validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Turkish J Drugs Therap 1999; 12: 102–106. Guédon-Moreau L, Cap