KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Oral mucosal lesions: a retrospective review of one institution’s 13-year experience

Burcu SENGÜVEN
Emre BARIŞ
Benay YILDIRIM
Alaa SHUIBAT
Özlem ÖZER YÜCEL
Farid MUSEYIBOV
Yeşim YILDIZ
Özkan BÜYÜK
Sibel Elif GÜLTEKIN
Sayfa
241–245
Yayın Tarihi
2015-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Geographic and ethnic differences of patients with various types of oral mucosal lesions require further investigation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:To investigate the relative frequency of biopsied nonneoplastic oral mucosal lesions in Ankara, Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: Biopsy records of a single center from 2000-2012 were retrospectively collected.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Geographic and ethnic differences of patients with various types of oral mucosal lesions require further investigation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2000-2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Epidemiology · hyperplastic lesions · oral mucosa

Özet

To investigate the relative frequency of biopsied nonneoplastic oral mucosal lesions in Ankara, Turkey. Materials and methods: Biopsy records of a single center from 2000-2012 were retrospectively collected. Diagnosis was recorded and evaluated with respect to patient demographics (age, sex) and location of the lesion. Results: Of 11,980 biopsies, 1732 (14.5%) were mucosal nonneoplastic lesions. Hyperplastic lesions (n = 1000, 57.7%) with fibroepithelial hyperplasia in 30.9% of patients were the most common type of oral nonneoplastic lesions. The mean age of patients differed with respect to type of mucosal lesion, tending to be lower in patients with reactive lesions. Dermatoses showed a female predominance. Conclusion: Our findings revealed that hyperplastic lesions were the most common among nonneoplastic oral mucosa lesions. Geographic and ethnic differences of patients with various types of oral mucosal lesions require further investigation.

Abstract

To investigate the relative frequency of biopsied nonneoplastic oral mucosal lesions in Ankara, Turkey. Materials and methods: Biopsy records of a single center from 2000-2012 were retrospectively collected. Diagnosis was recorded and evaluated with respect to patient demographics (age, sex) and location of the lesion. Results: Of 11,980 biopsies, 1732 (14.5%) were mucosal nonneoplastic lesions. Hyperplastic lesions (n = 1000, 57.7%) with fibroepithelial hyperplasia in 30.9% of patients were the most common type of oral nonneoplastic lesions. The mean age of patients differed with respect to type of mucosal lesion, tending to be lower in patients with reactive lesions. Dermatoses showed a female predominance. Conclusion: Our findings revealed that hyperplastic lesions were the most common among nonneoplastic oral mucosa lesions. Geographic and ethnic differences of patients with various types of oral mucosal lesions require further investigation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SENGÜVEN, B., BARIŞ, E., YILDIRIM, B., SHUIBAT, A., YÜCEL, Ö. Ö., MUSEYIBOV, F., YILDIZ, Y., BÜYÜK, Ö., GÜLTEKIN, S. E. (2015). Oral mucosal lesions: a retrospective review of one institution’s 13-year experience. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 241–245. https://ajindex.com/articles/212925

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Gultelkin SE, Tokman B, Turkseven MR. A review of paediatric oral biopsies in Turkey. Int Dent J 2003; 53: 26–32.
  2. Adisa AO, Adeyemi BF, Oluwasola AO, Kolude B, Akang EE, Lawoyin JO. Clinico-pathological profile of head and neck malignancies at University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Head Face Med 2011; 7: 9. Jones AV, Franklin CD. An analysis of oral and maxillofacial pathology found in adults over a 30-year period. J Oral Pathol Med 2006; 35: 392–401. 4. Endo H, Rees TD, Matsue M, Kuyama K, Nakadai M, Yamamoto H. Early detection and successful management of oral pemphigus vulgaris: a case report. J Periodontol 2005; 76: 154–160.
  3. Kumaraswamy KL, Vidhya M, Rao PK, Mukunda A. Oral biopsy: oral pathologist’s perspective. J Cancer Res Ther 2012; 8: 192–198.
  4. Zhang W, Chen Y, An Z, Geng N, Bao D. Reactive gingival lesions: a retrospective study of 2,439 cases. Quintessence Int 2007; 38: 103–110.
  5. Prabhu SR, Wilson DF. Human papillomavirus and oral disease - emerging evidence: a review. Aust Dent J 2013; 58: 2–10; quiz 125. Rubaci AH, Kazancioglu HO, Olgac V, Ak G. The roles of matrix metalloproteinases-2, -7, -10 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in the pathogenesis of oral lichen planus. J Oral Pathol Med 2012; 41: 689–696.
  6. Kaplan I, Ventura-Sharabi Y, Gal G, Calderon S, Anavi Y. The dynamics of oral lichen planus: a retrospective clinicopathological study. Head Neck Pathol 2012; 6: 178–183. Gondak RO, da Silva-Jorge R, Jorge J, Lopes MA, Vargas PA. Oral pigmented lesions: Clinicopathologic features and review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17: e919– 924. Sixto-Requeijo R, Diniz-Freitas M, Torreira-Lorenzo JC, Garcia-Garcia A, Gandara-Rey JM. An analysis of oral biopsies extracted from 1995 to 2009, in an oral medicine and surgery unit in Galicia (Spain). Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17: e16–22. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. St. Louis, MO, USA: Saunders; 2009.
  7. Mumcu G, Cimilli H, Sur H, Hayran O, Atalay T. Prevalence and distribution of oral lesions: a cross-sectional study in Turkey. Oral Dis 2005; 11: 81–87.
  8. Shamim T, Varghese VI, Shameena PM, Sudha S. A retrospective analysis of gingival biopsied lesions in South Indian population: 2001-2006. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008; 13: E414–418. Rossi EP, Hirsch SA. A survey of 4,793 oral lesions with emphasis on neoplasia and premalignancy. J Am Dent Assoc 1977; 94: 883–886. Bhaskar SN. Oral pathology in the dental offi