Dergiler / Journal of the Entomological Research Society / 2012 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Effects of amitraz on the parasitoid Encarsia formosa (Gahan) (Hymenoptera:Aphelinidae) for control of Trialeurodes vaporariorum westwood (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae): IOBC methods

Sayfa
61–69
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We concluded that amitraz is unsafe for E. formosa and it can not be used for integrated pest management in integration with E. formosa to control Trialeurodes vaporariorum.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The side effects of amitraz at three rates (the maximum recommended field concentration, 1/2 and 1/4 the maximum recommended field concentration) on Encarsia formosa were tested in the laboratory using the IOBC classification.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results showed that there is a significant difference in pupae mortality between the treatments and the untreated control group, but we did not observ adverse effects on fecundity and longevity.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We concluded that amitraz is unsafe for E. formosa and it can not be used for integrated pest management in integration with E. formosa to control Trialeurodes vaporariorum.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:bitki zararlıları · amitraz · yan etkiler

Abstract

The side effects of amitraz at three rates (the maximum recommended field concentration, 1/2 and 1/4 the maximum recommended field concentration) on Encarsia formosa were tested in the laboratory using the IOBC classification. The pupal mortality, fecundity and longevity of the parasitoid wasps exposed to pesticide were determined. Results showed that there is a significant difference in pupae mortality between the treatments and the untreated control group, but we did not observ adverse effects on fecundity and longevity. According to the IOBC classification, amitraz at the maximum recommended field concentration (E=89.09) and 1/2 dose (E=82.3) were found to be harmful and 1/4 dose (E=63.2) was moderately harmful for E. formosa. We concluded that amitraz is unsafe for E. formosa and it can not be used for integrated pest management in integration with E. formosa to control Trialeurodes vaporariorum.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GHOLAMZADEH, M. C., GHADAMYARI, M. (2012). Effects of amitraz on the parasitoid Encarsia formosa (Gahan) (Hymenoptera:Aphelinidae) for control of Trialeurodes vaporariorum westwood (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae): IOBC methods. Journal of the Entomological Research Society, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 61–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/211002

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Abbott, W. S., 1925, A method of comparing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18: 265-267.
  2. Alix, A., Cortesero, A. M., Nenon, J. P. Anger, J. P., 2001, Selectivity assessment of chlorfenvinphos reevaluated by including physiological and behavioral effects on an important beneficial insect. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20: 2530-2536.
  3. Amano, H., Haseeb, M., 2001, Recently- proposed methods and concepts of testing the effects of pesticides on the beneficial mite and insect species: study limitations and implications in IPM. Appllied Entomology and Zoology, 36: 1-11.
  4. Bakker, F., Grove, A., Blumel, S., Calis, J., Oomen, P., 1992, Side effect tests for phytoseiids and their rearing methods. IOBC/ WPRS Bulletin, 15:61-75.
  5. Boller, E. F., Vogt, H., Ternes, P., Malavolta, C., 2005, Working document on selectivity of pesticides (2005). Available on: (http://www.IOBC.Ch/2005/Working%20Document%20Pesticides_Explanations.pdf).
  6. Boyd, M.L., Boethel, D. J., 1998, Susceptibility of predaceous hemipteran species to selected insecticides on soybean in Louisiana. Journal of Economic Entomology, 91: 401-409.
  7. Campbell, C. D., Walgenbach, J.F., Kennedy, G. G., 1991, Effect of parasitoids on lepidopterous pests in insecticide-treated and untreated tomatoes in Western North Carolina. Journal of Economic Entomology, 84:1662-1667.
  8. Castaner, M., Garrido, A., 1995, Contact toxicity and persistence of seven insecticides to three beneficial species used in biological control: Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, Lysiphlebus testacipes and Encarsia formosa. Investigacion Agraria Produccion- y- Proteccion Vegetales. 10 (1): 139-147.
  9. Chiasson, H., Vincent, C., Bostanian, N. J., 2004, Insecticidal Properties of a Chenopodium-Based Botanical. Journal of Economic Entomology, 97 (4):1378-1383.
  10. Croft, B. A., 1990, Arthropod biological control agent and pesticides. Jon Wiley and Sons. New York, U. S. A. 723 pp. Desneux, N., Wajnberg, E., Fauvergue, X., Privet, S. Kaiser, L., 2004, Sublethal effects of a neurotoxic insecticide on the oviposition behaviour and the patch-time allocation in two aphid parasitoids, Diaeretiella rapae and Aphidius matricariae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 112: 227-235.
  11. Dohmen, G.P., 1998, Comparing pesticide effects on beneficials in a sequential testing scheme. In: P.T. Haskell and P. McEwen (edsEcotoxicology: Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms. Kluwer Academic Publishers,
  12. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 191-201.
  13. Feldhege, M.