Dergiler / art / 2020 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Radiographic Progression in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis According to Uveitis Based on the Observation Study of Korean Spondyloarthropathy Registry

Dergi
art
Sayfa
1–6
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Our study confirms that there is no significant association between uveitis and radiographic progression in patients with AS after adjusting for confounding factors.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to investigate radiographic progression according to the presence or absence of uveitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients and methods: A total of 598 patients (529 males, 69 females, mean age 38.1±9.2 years; range, 18 to 73 years) from the Observation Study of Korean Spondyloarthropathy Registry who met the modified New York criteria for AS were included in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Our study confirms that there is no significant association between uveitis and radiographic progression in patients with AS after adjusting for confounding factors.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to investigate radiographic progression according to the presence or absence of uveitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Patients and methods: A total of 598 patients (529 males, 69 females, mean age 38.1±9.2 years; range, 18 to 73 years) from the Observation Study of Korean Spondyloarthropathy Registry who met the modified New York criteria for AS were included in this study. At baseline, all data were stratified into two groups according to the presence or absence of uveitis. Baseline and radiographic progression were assessed for five years in this registry. Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) was read by two radiologists. Reliability was assessed using inter- and intra-class correlation coefficient for each radiograph. Comparison of mSASSS changes was analyzed by analysis of covariance model after adjusting for confounding factors. Results: The evaluation of mSASSS showed good agreement between the two readers. A total of 193 patients (32.27%) had a history of uveitis that presented at a mean age of 39.6 years, including 30 females (15.54%). There were statistically significant differences in age (p=0.01), sex (p=0.04), hip joint involvement (p<0.01), and human leukocyte antigen B27 carrier state (p=0.02) between the two groups according to uveitis. A simple comparison revealed no significant difference in mSASSS change for five years between the two groups (mean: 3.05±0.62 vs. 3.78±0.78, p=0.47). After adjusting for confounding factors in multiple comparisons by Bonferroni correction, patients with uveitis had no significant association with mSASSS change for five years (mean: 6.29±1.32 vs. 5.49±1.39, p=0.68). Conclusion: Our study confirms that there is no significant association between uveitis and radiographic progression in patients with AS after adjusting for confounding factors.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KOOK, H., JIN, S., LEE, S., LEE, S., KIM, T., KIM, T. (2020). Radiographic Progression in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis According to Uveitis Based on the Observation Study of Korean Spondyloarthropathy Registry. art, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/210391

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Kim TJ, Kim TH. Clinical spectrum of ankylosing spondylitis in Korea. Joint Bone Spine 2010;77:235-40
  2. Sun L, Wu R, Xue Q, Wang F, Lu P. Risk factors of uveitis in ankylosing spondylitis: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e4233
  3. Dakwar E, Reddy J, Vale FL, Uribe JS. A review of the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis. Neurosurg Focus 2008;24:E2
  4. Westerveld LA, van Bemmel JC, Dhert WJ, Oner FC, Verlaan JJ. Clinical outcome after traumatic spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders compared with control patients. Spine J 2014;14:729-40
  5. Gehlen M, Regis KC, Skare TL. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and treatment characteristics of spondyloarthritis patients with and without acute anterior uveitis. Sao Paulo Med J 2012;130:141-4
  6. Lu MC, Hsu BB, Koo M, Lai NS. Higher risk of incident ankylosing spondylitis in patients with uveitis: a secondary cohort analysis of a nationwide, population-based health claims database. Scand J Rheumatol 2017;46:468-73
  7. Gouveia EB, Elmann D, Morales MS. Ankylosing spondylitis and uveitis: overview. Rev Bras Reumatol 2012;52:742-56
  8. Chen CH, Lin KC, Chen HA, Liao HT, Liang TH, Wang HP, et al. Association of acute anterior uveitis with disease activity, functional ability and physical mobility in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a cross-sectional study of Chinese patients in Taiwan. Clin Rheumatol 2007;26:953-7
  9. Zeboulon N, Dougados M, Gossec L. Prevalence and characteristics of uveitis in the spondyloarthropathies: a systematic literature review.Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:955-9
  10. Fernández-Melón J, Muñoz-Fernández S, Hidalgo V, Bonilla-Hernán G, Schlincker A, Fonseca A, et al. Uveitis as the initial clinical manifestation in patients with spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol 2004;31:524-7
  11. Mitulescu TC, Popescu C, Naie A, Predeţeanu D, Popescu V, Alexandrescu C, et al. Acute anterior uveitis and other extra-articular manifestations of spondyloarthritis. J Med Life 2015;8:319-25. 12. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361-8
  12. Creemers MC, Franssen MJ, van't Hof MA, Gribnau FW, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiographic scoring system. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:127-9
  13. Baraliakos X, Listing J, Rudwaleit M, Brandt J, Sieper J, Braun J. Radiographic progress