KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Business and Economics Research Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Service Quality in Private Secondary Schools: Extension to EduQUAL with a case from Turkey

Cagri BULUT
Sefer AYDOĞAN
Sayfa
145–155
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Empathy-related services at schools are the most significant indicators of the EduQUAL both on student satisfaction and student loyalty.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Previous research on measuring the service quality presents alternative assessment instruments of SERVQUAL by customizing the generic indicators of service quality to sector-specific features for various service markets.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study contributes to the EduQUAL literature by extending with a new dimension covering the quality assessment of the core educational services with empirical evidence generated in 2019 over the secondary-school students of private schools operating in Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Empathy-related services at schools are the most significant indicators of the EduQUAL both on student satisfaction and student loyalty.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Previous research on measuring the service quality presents alternative assessment instruments of SERVQUAL by customizing the generic indicators of service quality to sector-specific features for various service markets. EduQUAL is the specific method of SERVQUAL assessment for measuring the service quality of educational services. This study contributes to the EduQUAL literature by extending with a new dimension covering the quality assessment of the core educational services with empirical evidence generated in 2019 over the secondary-school students of private schools operating in Turkey. Therefore, the current study aims to extend the EduQUAL assessment of the private chain schools and aims to which of these successful schools' service quality indicators predict student satisfaction and student loyalty. The study's data represents 305 students' perceptions of a private school operating in Turkey with more than 100 branches. The factor analysis results yield a new dimension related to core educational services. The regression analyses' results reveal that the core educational services predict only student satisfaction with other service quality indicators. Empathy-related services at schools are the most significant indicators of the EduQUAL both on student satisfaction and student loyalty.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BULUT, C., AYDOĞAN, S. (2021). Service Quality in Private Secondary Schools: Extension to EduQUAL with a case from Turkey. Business and Economics Research Journal, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 145–155. https://ajindex.com/articles/210191

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Abdullah, F. (2006). Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(1), 31-47.
  2. Ali, F., Zhou, Y., Hussain, K., Nair, P. K., & Ragavan, N. A. (2016). Does higher education service quality effect student satisfaction, image and loyalty? A Study of International Students in Malaysian Public Universities. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 70-94.
  3. Annamdevula, S., & Bellamkonda, R. S. (2016). Effect of student perceived service quality on student satisfaction, loyalty and motivation in Indian universities: Development of HiEduQual. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(2), 488-517.
  4. Berry, L. L., Parasuraman, A., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1994). Improving service quality in America: Lessons learned. Academy of Management Perspectives, 8(2), 32-45.
  5. Bezerra, G. C. L., & Gomes, C. F. (2016). Measuring airport service quality: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 53, 85-93.
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Data analysis handbook. Ankara:
  7. Pegem A Publishing Carman, J. M. (1990). Consumer perceptions of service quality: An assessment of the SERVQUAL. Journal of Retailing, 66(1), 33-55.
  8. Chong, Y. S., & Ahmed, P. K. (2012). An empirical investigation of student's motivational impact upon university service quality perception: A self-determination perspective? Quality Higher Education, 18(1), 35-57.
  9. Chui, T. B., Ahmad, M. S. bin, Bassim, F. binti A., & Zaimi, N. binti A (2016). Evaluation of service quality of private higher education using service improvement matrix. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224. Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A Reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
  10. Cronin Jr, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling performance-based and perceptionsminus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of marketing, 58(1), 125-131.
  11. De Jager, J., & Gbadamosi, G. (2010). Specific remedy for specific problem: Measuring service quality in South African higher education. Higher Education, 60(3), 251-267.
  12. Elliot, K. M., & Healy M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10, 1-11.
  13. Hasan, H. F. A., Ilias, A., Rahman, R. A., & Razak, M. Z. A. (2008). Service quality and student satisfaction: A case study at private higher education institutions. International Business Research, 1(3), 163-175. Helgesen, Ø