Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 6

Comparison of effectiveness of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebra fractures

Sayfa
619–622
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebra fractures.Methods: TheŞles of the patients who underwent vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for osteoporoticvertebrae fractures were retrieved from the archives.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The patients were evaluated for radiological outcomes in terms of localkyphosis angle, wedging index, compression ratio, visual analog pain scale (VAS) and Oswestry DisabilityIndex (ODI).Results: In the study group, kyphoplasty was performed on 24 vertebrae of 22 patients (17 females, 5males; mean age: 73 years) whereas vertebroplasty was applied on 24 vertebrae of 21 (16 females, 5males; mean age: 74.7 years) patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebra fractures.Methods: TheŞles of the patients who underwent vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for osteoporoticvertebrae fractures were retrieved from the archives. Forty-three patients with complete follow-up datawere included in the study group. The patients were evaluated for radiological outcomes in terms of localkyphosis angle, wedging index, compression ratio, visual analog pain scale (VAS) and Oswestry DisabilityIndex (ODI).Results: In the study group, kyphoplasty was performed on 24 vertebrae of 22 patients (17 females, 5males; mean age: 73 years) whereas vertebroplasty was applied on 24 vertebrae of 21 (16 females, 5males; mean age: 74.7 years) patients. The mean follow-up time was 26 months. When the VAS and ODIvalues of the groups were analyzed, both groups showed statistically signiŞcant progress after theoperation. Radiological data showed that the kyphoplasty group showed statistically signiŞcantimprovement in the sagittal index values whereas the vertebroplasty group did not. The overallcomplication ratio was 4%.Conclusion: Both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are effective treatment methods for functional recovery and pain relief in osteoporotic fractures of the vertebra. Although radiological outcomes of thekyphoplasty seem to be better, this does not have any clinical relevance. We suggest vertebroplasty overkyphoplasty since it is an easier method to manage.Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic study.© 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATESA, A., GEMALMAZB, H. C., DEVECİ, M. A., SİMSEKD, S. A., ÇETİNE, E., SENKOYLÜF, A. (2016). Comparison of effectiveness of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebra fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 6, 619–622. https://ajindex.com/articles/208504

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Steindler A. The classic: osteoporosis. 1956. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443: 3e9. discussion 2
  2. Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(Suppl. 2):S3eS7
  3. Jalava T, Sarna S, Pylkk€ anen L, et al. Association between vertebral fracture and increased mortality in osteoporotic patients. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18: 1254e1260
  4. Lavelle W, Carl A, Lavelle ED, Khaleel MA. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Med Clin North Am. 2007;91:299e314
  5. Altun NS¸. Torakolomber vertebra kırıklarının tedavi oncesi ve sonras € ı degerlendirilmesi. Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg. 1993;4:30e34
  6. Yakut Y, Yakut E, Bayar K, Uygur F. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version short-form McGill pain questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26:1083e1087
  7. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:2940e2952. discussion 2952
  8. Yakut E, Düger T, Oksüz C, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:581e585. discussion 585
  9. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, Deramond H. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1537e1541
  10. Deramond H, Depriester C, Toussaint P, Galibert P. Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 1997;1:285e296
  11. Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, Hardy N, Deramond H, Fardellone P. Longterm observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39:1410e1414
  12. Kaufmann TJ, Jensen ME, Schweickert PA, Marx WF, Kallmes DF. Age of fracture and clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1860e1863
  13. Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1511e1515
  14. Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G. Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:1631e1638
  15. Taylor RS, Taylor RJ, Fritzell P. Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: a comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2747e2755
  16. Boszczyk BM, Bierschneid