Dergiler / Alman Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi / 2020 / Sayı: 43

The Relationship of Letters and Sounds in German. An Error Analysis of the Pronunciation of Multilingual Turkish Students

Sayfa
101–127
Yayın Tarihi
2020-06-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

From the results, it can be concluded that multilingual learners have many advantages in pronunciation skills and that the deviations are due to the interference of the written language and the previously learned (foreign) languages rather than errors.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A challenge for foreign language learners is the correspondence of the written language with the sounds of the target language.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the context of the present study, an error analysis in the sense of Kleppin (1998) was carried out.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:From the results, it can be concluded that multilingual learners have many advantages in pronunciation skills and that the deviations are due to the interference of the written language and the previously learned (foreign) languages rather than errors.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Pronunciation · Sound-Letter-Relationship · Sound

Abstract

A challenge for foreign language learners is the correspondence of the written language with the sounds of the target language. Although the sound-to-letter relationship of German is not as complicated as English or French, the German language does not have total sound-to-letter correspondence. The aim of this study is to question which sounds are more problematic for multilingual Turkish German learners in university education. A further aim is to determine the possible causes of their pronunciation deviations. In the context of the present study, an error analysis in the sense of Kleppin (1998) was carried out. The sample of the study was a group of Turkish university students who learned German as a third foreign language. To collect the data, the respondents were asked to perform a number of actions: to pronounce a list of selected words, record themselves with electronic recording devices and then send the digitally stored recorded files to the researchers. The deviations were dominated by vowels, including diphthongs and vowels with umlauts, which was expected. The causes of the deviations were mostly due to the interferences of the written language and the previously learned (foreign) languages. From the results, it can be concluded that multilingual learners have many advantages in pronunciation skills and that the deviations are due to the interference of the written language and the previously learned (foreign) languages rather than errors.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÖKSAL, H., ÇINAR, S. (2020). The Relationship of Letters and Sounds in German. An Error Analysis of the Pronunciation of Multilingual Turkish Students. Alman Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi, Sayı: 43, 101–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/206839

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Barkowski, H. u.a. (2014).
  2. Deutsch als fremde Sprache, Deutsch lehren lernen 3. München: Goethe Institut und Klett-Langenscheidt Verlag. Bayrak, A. (2013). Aussprachliche Interferenzen der Studenten bei der DaF-Lehrerausbildung, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(14), 81-91. Abrufbar unter: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/113413
  3. Dengler, S., Rusch, P., Schmitz, H., & Sieber, T. (2017). Netzwerk Deutsch als Fremdsprache Kursbuch mit Audio-CDs A1-A2. Klett Verlag, Stuttgart. Deutsche Welle (2006). Aussprache: Laut-Buchstaben-Beziehungen im Deutschen, Deutsche-Welle – Cornelsen Verlag, Abrufbar unter: https://www.dw.com/downloads/26294204/lektion4-lehrer-aussprache.pdf (01.10.2019).
  4. Dieling, H. & Hirschfeld, U. (2000).
  5. Phonetik lehren und lernen, Fernstudieneinheit 21. Goethe Institut, München. Dieling, H. (1992). Phonetik im Fremdsprachenunterricht Deutsch. Berlin, Langenscheidt KG. Europarat (2017). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment – Companion Volume With New Descriptors. Abrufbar unter: https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volumewith-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989 (13.06.2019).
  6. Gippert, J. (1980). Zweisprachige Hinweise zum Sprachunterricht. Türkisch- Deutscher Sprachvergleich. In: Abalı, Ü. (Hrsg.). Zweitsprache Deutsch im Unterricht. Sprachunterricht für türk. Schüler (S. 86-102), Weinheim/Basel, Beltz-Verlag 1980, Abrufbar unter: http://titus.fkidg1.uni-frankfurt.de/personal/jg/pdf/jg1980.pdf
  7. Gross, H. (1990). Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik. München, Iudicium-Verlag. Grzeszczakowska-Pawlikowska, B. (2007). Probleme Beim Rhythmuserwerb – Ausgangssprache Polnisch und Zielsprache Deutsch. Zeitschrift für interkulturellen fremdsprachenunterricht, 12(2), 1-23.
  8. Hirschfeld, U. & Reinke, K. (2007). Phonetik in Deutsch Als Fremdsprache: Theorie und Praxis – Einführung in Das Themenheft. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 12(2), 7. Kai, W. (2019). Untersuchungen zur Methodik und Effizienz der tastaturbasierten Eingabeverfahren verschiedener Schriftsysteme der Welt (Inaugural-Dissertation, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen). Abrufbar unter: http:// geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2019/14295/pdf/WangKai_2019_02_13.pdf Kleppin, K. (1998).
  9. Fehler und Fehlerkorrektur, Fernstudieneinheit 19. München, Goethe Institut. Korkmaz, G. (2018). Ausspracheschwierigkeiten türkischer Deutschlernender in den Vorbereitungsklassen und eine mediengestützte Ausspracheschulung dazu, Anadolu U