Dergiler / Turkish Studies - Social Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

A New Concept in Social Science: Organizational Abomination, Its Effects and Results

Sosyal Bilimlerde Yeni Bir Kavram: Örgütsel Abominasyon, Etkileri ve Sonuçları

Sayfa
1395–1409
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The existence of the concept, its effects on individuals and organizations, and in the light of the data obtained from the scale that developed to determine the concept of organizational abomination, has been presented in detail.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Today's organizations continue their activities in an intense competitive environment in the local and global context.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Such problematic employees, who may contradict organizational values but can make significant contributions to the organization, can be employed by organizations to provide stronger competitiveness and organizational benefits.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The existence of the concept, its effects on individuals and organizations, and in the light of the data obtained from the scale that developed to determine the concept of organizational abomination, has been presented in detail.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Today's organizations continue their activities in an intense competitive environment in the local and global context. The requirements of this competitive environment can push them to many different organizational applications. Especially the human element that can provide competitive advantage to the enterprises and the contributions attract the attention of the organizations. Under such intense and difficult competition conditions, organizations may have to employ some employees who are not compatible with their internal structures in order to gain advantage over their competitors and to carry the organization into the future. Such problematic employees, who may contradict organizational values but can make significant contributions to the organization, can be employed by organizations to provide stronger competitiveness and organizational benefits. In this research, statistical analyzes have been carried out and the results have been examined in order to identify those individuals that the organizations have to employ due to environmental conditions and to identify a new concept in this field. In order to reveal this concept, which has not been examined before, companies operating in the textile accessories sector were included in the research and the results obtained as a result of the scale created were explained deeply. In this context, findings that can be considered important in terms of organizational behavioral science regarding the determination of the concept were obtained. As a result of the analysis of the 304 questionnaire, which were analyzed in the SPSS.22 program and obtained from the sector, the findings related to the existence of the concept were reached. The existence of the concept, its effects on individuals and organizations, and in the light of the data obtained from the scale that developed to determine the concept of organizational abomination, has been presented in detail.

Abstract

Günümüz örgütleri bulundukları yerel ve global anlamda yoğun rekabet ortamında faaliyetlerine devam etmektedirler. Bu rekabetçi ortamın getirdiği gereksinimler onları birçok farklı örgütsel uygulamaya itebilmektedir. Özellikle işletmelere rekabet avantajı sağlayabilecek insan unsuru ve onun örgütlere sunacağı katkılar, örgütlerin fazlasıyla dikkatini çekmektedir. Böylesine yoğun ve zorlu rekabet koşulları altında örgütler, rakiplerine göre avantaj sağlamak ve örgütü geleceğe taşıyabilmek adına iç yapılarıyla uyumlu olmayan bazı çalışanları istihdam etmek durumunda kalabilmektedirler. Örgütsel değerlere ters düşse de örgüte önemli katkılarda bulunabilecek bu tür sorunlu çalışanlar örgütler tarafından salt daha güçlü rekabet edebilirlik ve örgütsel fayda sağlamak adına istihdam edilebilmektedir. Bu araştırmada, örgütün çevresel koşullar nedeniyle çalıştırmak zorunda kaldığı bu kişileri belirleyebilmek ve bu alanda yeni bir kavramın tespitini sağlamak adına istatistiksel analizler gerçekleştirilmiş, sonuçları irdelenmiştir. Daha önce incelenmemiş olan bu kavramın ortaya konulabilmesi adına tekstil aksesuarları sektöründe faaliyet gösteren şirketler araştırmaya dahil edilmiş ve oluşturulan ölçek sonucunda elde edilen sonuçlar detaylı bir biçimde açıklanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, kavramın tespit edilebilmesine ilişkin örgütsel davranış bilimi açısından önemli sayılabilecek bulgular elde edilmiştir. SPSS.22 programında analiz edilen ve sektörden elde edilen 304 anketin analizi sonucunda, kavramın varlığına ilişkin bulgulara ulaşılmıştır. Kavramın varlığı, birey ve örgütlere etkisi, örgütsel abominasyon kavramının tespit edilmesi için geliştirilen ölçeğin uygulanması sonucunda elde edilen veriler ışığında detaylı bir biçimde ortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZPEHLİVAN, M. (2020). A New Concept in Social Science: Organizational Abomination, Its Effects and Results. Turkish Studies - Social Sciences, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 1395–1409. https://ajindex.com/articles/206823

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (19)

  1. Amburgey, T. A., Kelley, D., Barnett, W. P., (1993), Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 51-73.
  2. Abowd, J. M., Kramarz, F., Margolis, D. N., (1994), High wage workers and high wage firms, Nber Working Paper Series, 2-71.
  3. Bagozzi, R. P., Phillips, L. W, (1982), Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construct, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459-489.
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y, (1988) On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  5. Bartlett, C.A., & Ghoshal, S., (2002), Building competitive advantage through people, MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(2), 34-41.
  6. Barney, J. B., (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  7. Barney, J. B., (1995), Looking inside for competitive advantage, The Academy of Management Executive, 9(4): 49-61.
  8. Bernard, B. B., (1966), Organizational goals and inmate organization, American Journal of Sociology, 71(5), 522-534.
  9. Blanchflowe, D.G., Oswald, A. J., Sanfey, P., (1992), Wages, profits and rent-sharing, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambride. Blau, P. M., (1964),
  10. Exchange and power in social life, New Yor: Wiley. Buckingham, M., (2005), What great managers do. Harvard Business Review, 83, 70-79.
  11. Buckingham, M., & Vosburgh, R. M., (2001), The 21st century human resources function: It's the talent, stupid! Human Resource Planning, 24, 17-23.
  12. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A. (1990), Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
  13. Cooper, R. & Slagmulder, R., (1997),
  14. Target Costing and Value Engineering, Portland, OR, Oregon, Productivity Press.
  15. Cronbach, L. J., Shavelson, R. J, (2004), My Current Thoughts on Coeefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures, Educational and Psychological Measurement. 64(3), 391-418.
  16. Etzioni, A., (1961), A comparative analysis of complex organizations, New York: Free Press.
  17. Frank, F. D., Finnegan, R. P. & Taylor, C. R., (2004), The race for talent: retaining and engaging workers in the 21st century, Human Resource Planning, 27(3), 12-25.
  18. Garver, M. S., Mentzer, J. T., (1999), Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modelling to test for construct validity, Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 33-57.
  19. Gould, S., (1979), An enquity-exchange model of organizational involvement, Academy of Management Review, 4, 53-62. H