Dergiler / Kocaeli Tıp Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Laparoscopic and Conventional Incisional Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Analysis

Laparoskopik ve Konvansiyonel İnsizyonel Herni Tamiri: Retrospektif Bir Analiz

Sayfa
87–91
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair has similar short term outcomes with open technique.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:INTRODUCTION: To analyze the outcomes of laparoscopic and open techniques in incisional hernia repair.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:RESULTS: Nineteen [12 female (63.2%), mean±SD age of 53.5±15.1] of 33 patients were operated on with open technique, whereas 14 [11 female (78.5%), mean±SD age of 59.1±14.2] patients with laparoscopic technique.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair has similar short term outcomes with open technique.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

INTRODUCTION: To analyze the outcomes of laparoscopic and open techniques in incisional hernia repair. METHODS: Patients’ charts with incisional hernia were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, disease and operation related variables and short term outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Nineteen [12 female (63.2%), mean±SD age of 53.5±15.1] of 33 patients were operated on with open technique, whereas 14 [11 female (78.5%), mean±SD age of 59.1±14.2] patients with laparoscopic technique. Body mass index was bigger in laparoscopic group (30.3±4.6 vs. 34.4±6.3, p=0.041). Hernia size and operation time was not different between groups (7.6±4.8 cm vs. 8.9±3.1 cm, p=0.404) and [100(40-300) vs. 77.5(35-150) minutes, p=0.071), respectively. Length of stay was 2 days after both techniques. DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair has similar short term outcomes with open technique.

Abstract

GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: İnsizyonel herni tamirinde laparoskopik ve açık yöntemlerin kısa dönem sonuçlara etkisinin araştırılması YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: İnsizyonel herni nedeniyle laparoskopik veya açık olarak opere edilen hastalar retrospektif olarak tarandı. Gruplarda demografik veriler, hastalığa ve operasyona ait veriler ile kısa dönem sonuçlar irdelendi. BULGULAR: 33 hastanın 19 [12 kadın (%63,2), ortalama yaş: 53,5±15,1] açık yöntemle ameliyat edilirken, 14 [11 kadın (%78,5), ortalama yaş: 59,1±14,2] hasta laparoskopik yöntemle ameliyat edildi. Vücut kitle indeksi laparoskopik grupta daha yüksek görüldü (30,3±4,6 karşın 34,4±6,3, p=0,041). Herni defektlerinin büyüklüğü açık karşın laparoskopi 7,6±4,8 cm ile 8,9±3,1 cm idi, p=0.404. Operasyon süreleri açıkta 100 (40-300) dakika iken, laparoskopide 77,5 (35- 150) dakika idi, p=0.071. Yatış süreleri ise her iki grupta da ortalama 2 gün idi. TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: İnsizyonel herni tamiri sonrası kısa dönemde laparoskopi yöntemi açık yönteme benzer sonuçlar vermektedir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HAKSAL, M. C., GEZEN, C., OKKABAZ, N., YILMAZ, M., ÖNCEL, M. (2018). Laparoscopic and Conventional Incisional Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Analysis. Kocaeli Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 87–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/205569

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. C. Fink, P. Baumann, M.N. Wente, et al. Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy, Br. J. Surg. 2014; 101:51-4
  2. W.B. Saunders, Dorland's Pocket Medical Dictionary, Pennsylvania, USA, 1995
  3. T.E. Bucknall, P.J. Cok, H. Ellis. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies, Br. Med. J. 1992;284: 931-3
  4. M. Mudge, L.E. Hughes. Incisional hernia: a ten year prospective study of incidence and attitudes, Br. J. Surg. 1985;72:70-1
  5. R.C. Read, G. Yoder. Recent trends in management of incisional herniation, Arch. Surg. 1989;124: 485-8
  6. K.W. Millikan. Incisional hernia repair, Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2003;83: 1223-34
  7. R.W. Luijendijk, W.C.J. Hop, P. van den Tol, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia, N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;343: 392-8
  8. D. Flum, K. Horvath, T. Koepsell. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis, Ann. Surg. 2003;237: 129-35
  9. K. Cassar, A. Munro. Surgical treatment of incisional hernia, Br. J. Surg. 2002;89:534-45
  10. G. Navarra, C. Musolino, M.L. De Marco, et al. Retromuscular sutured incisional hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial to compare open and laparoscopic approach, Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 2007;17:86-90
  11. S. Olmi, A. Scaini, G.C. Cesana, et al. Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled study, Surg. Endosc. 2007;21: 555-9
  12. K.A. LeBlanc, W.V. Booth. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminaryfindings, Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. 1993;3: 39-41
  13. K.A. LeBlanc, W.V. Booth, J.M. Whitaker. Laparoscopic incisional and ventral herniorrhaphy:our initial 100 patients, Am. J. Surg. 2000;180: 193-7
  14. M. Solej, V. Martino, P. Mao, et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, Minerva Chir. 2012;67: 381-7
  15. A.G. Ferrarese, V. Martino, S. Enrico, et al. Laparoscopic repair of wound defects in the elderly: our experience of 5 years, BMC Surg. 2013;13: S23
  16. A.G. Ferrarese, S. Enrico, M. Solej, et al. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal mesh in inguinal hernia repair in elderly: end point of our experience, BMC Surg. 2013;13:S24 17. P.H. Harris, M. Helfand, S.H. Woolf, et al. Methods Work Group, Third US Preventive Services Task Force, Current methods of the US preventive services task force: a review of the process, Am. J. Prev. Med. 2001;20: