Dergiler / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

The Analgesic Effects of Incisional Levobupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

Sayfa
64–68
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine added to local anesthetic agent applied to the wound site reduced the analgesic consumption and improved the pain scores in total abdominal hysterectomy surgery.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine added levobupivacaine applied into the wound site by infiltration in total abdominal hysterectomy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: We studied 50 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine added to local anesthetic agent applied to the wound site reduced the analgesic consumption and improved the pain scores in total abdominal hysterectomy surgery.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine added levobupivacaine applied into the wound site by infiltration in total abdominal hysterectomy. Materials and Methods: We studied 50 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy. The patients were randomized into two groups: infiltration of the surgical area with 0.25% levobupi- vacaine (40 mL) (Group L) or 0.25% levobupivacaine plus 2 mcg kg&#8722;1 dexmedetomidine (40 mL) (Group DL) 5 min before skin incision. After anesthesia induction, 5 min before surgical incision, 20 mL of the trial preparation (0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.25% levobupivacaine plus 2 mcg.kg&#8722;1 dexmedetomidine) was injected in the subcutaneus tissue along the marked line of skin incision. Another 20 mL of the same trial preparation was then infiltrated preperitoneally along the line of the planned incision of the peritoneum. Results: Total meperidine consumption was significantly lower in Group DL (p=0.003). The visual analog scale (VAS) values at resting were significantly lower at 0, 2, and 4 h (p=0.001, 0.001, and 0.003, respectively) in Group DL in the postoperative period. VAS values at coughing were lower in Group DL at postoperative 0, 2, 4, 6, and 12 h (p=0.001; 001; 0.003; 0.006; 0.008 respectively). The need for rescue analgesic was significantly high in Group L (p<0.001). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine added to local anesthetic agent applied to the wound site reduced the analgesic consumption and improved the pain scores in total abdominal hysterectomy surgery.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÜLGEN, A., MÜDERİS, İ., GÜNEŞ, I., BAYRAM, A., BİÇER, C., KURT, M. F., BOYACI, A. (2015). The Analgesic Effects of Incisional Levobupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 64–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/204893

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Bardsley H, Gristwood R, Baker H, Watson N, Nimmo W. A compari- son of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupiva- caine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998
  2. 46(3): 245-9. [CrossRef] 2. Morrison SG, Dominguez JJ, Frascarolo P, Reiz S. A comparison of the electrocardiographic cardiotoxic effects of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in anesthetized swine. Anesth Analg 2000
  3. 90(6): 1308-14. [CrossRef] 3. Hannibal K, Galatius H, Hansen A, Obel E, Ejlersen E. Preoperative wound infiltration with bupivacaine reduces early and late opioid re- quirement after hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 1996
  4. 83(2): 376-81. 4. Ng A, Swami A, Smith G et al. The analgesic effects of intraperitoneal and incisional bupivacaine with epinephrine after total abdominal hys- terectomy. Anesth Analg 2002
  5. 95(1): 158-62. [CrossRef] 5. Hall JE, Uhrich TD, Barney JA, Arain SR, Ebert TJ. Sedative, amnes- tic, and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine infusions. Anesth Analg. 2000
  6. 90(3): 699-705. [CrossRef] 6. Bharti N, Dontukurthy S, Bala I, Singh G. Postoperative analgesic effect of intravenous (i.v.) clonidine compared with clonidine adminis- tration in wound infiltration for open cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2013
  7. 111 (4): 656-61. [CrossRef] 7. Giannoni C, White S, Enneking FK, Morey T. Ropivacaine with or without clonidine improves pediatric tonsillectomy pain. Arch Otolar- yngol Head Neck Surg 2001
  8. 127(10): 1265-70. [CrossRef] 8. Connelly NR, Reuben SS, Albert M, Page D, Gibson CS, Moineau A, et al. Use of clonidine in hernia patients: intramuscular versus surgical site. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999
  9. 24(5): 422-5. [CrossRef] 9. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970 Nov-Dec
  10. 49(6):924-34. [CrossRef] 10. Liu S, Carpenter RL, Chiu AA, McGill TJ, Mantell SA. Epinephrine prolongs duration of subcutaneous infiltration of local anesthesia in a dose-related manner. Correlation with magnitude of vasoconstriction. Reg Anesth 1995
  11. 20(5): 378-84. 11. Arain SR, Ruehlow RM, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. The efficacy of dexme- detomidine versus morphine for postoperative analgesia after major inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 2004
  12. 98(1): 153-8. [CrossRef] 12. Abdallah FW, Abrishami A, Brull R. The facilitatory effects of intrave- nous dexmedetomidine on the duration of spinal anesthesia: a system- atic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2013
  13. 117(1): 271-8. [CrossRef] 13. Me