Dergiler / European Journal of Technique / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

ENERGY POTENTIAL OF ANIMAL BIOMASS IN TURKEY

Sayfa
160–167
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results indicated that 1.36 million tons of oil equivalent would be exploited by the animal biomass potential of Turkey according to the 2016 data.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, animal biomass energy potential of Turkey was presented in detail based on the countrywide livestock.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:According to the results, bovine animals possess 67.1% of total energy potential, and among bovine animals, cattle has the highest energy potential with 61%.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results indicated that 1.36 million tons of oil equivalent would be exploited by the animal biomass potential of Turkey according to the 2016 data.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Animal Biomass · Energy Potential · Waste

Abstract

In this study, animal biomass energy potential of Turkey was presented in detail based on the countrywide livestock. Animal biomass resources were examined under three major groups: bovine, small ruminant, and poultry. Bovine animals were described in terms of three different cattle species, buffalo and other species (horse, donkey, camel, mule and pig). Sheep and goat were considered as two subspecies of small ruminant. Poultry consisted of two different chicken species, turkey, goose and duck. The status of animal biomass in Turkey and its exploitation by use of anaerobic digestion and consequent combustion of methane produced for energy production were presented. A detailed analysis was made to determine which animal species has high energy potential of biomass. The potential of energy, waste and the production depending on every single subspecies were indicated in the analyses. The waste coefficients for species were obtained from the biomass energy potential atlas of Turkey and the animal production data reported by the Turkish Statistical Institute. Additionally, energy potential changes in recent years for every single species were calculated. According to the results, bovine animals possess 67.1% of total energy potential, and among bovine animals, cattle has the highest energy potential with 61%. Results indicated that 1.36 million tons of oil equivalent would be exploited by the animal biomass potential of Turkey according to the 2016 data.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAKA, K., YILMAZ, İ. H., CANBOLAT, A. S., KAYNAKLI, Ö. (2018). ENERGY POTENTIAL OF ANIMAL BIOMASS IN TURKEY. European Journal of Technique, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 160–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/201962

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Demirbas, A. (2009). Biofuels from Agricultural Biomass. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 31:1573–1582
  2. Kumar, A., Kumar, N., Baredar, P., and Ashish, S. (2015). A review on biomass energy resources, potential, conversion and policy in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 45:530–539
  3. Halder, P. K., Paul, N., and Beg, M. R. A. (2014). Assessment of biomass energy resources and related technologies practice in Bangladesh. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 39:444–460
  4. Weldemichael, Y., and Assefa, G. (2016). Assessing the energy production and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions mitigation potential of biomass resources for Alberta. Journal of Cleaner Production. 112:425–4264
  5. Cutz, L., Haro, P., Santana, D., and Johnsson, F. (2016). Assessment of biomass energy sources and technologies: The case of Central America. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 58:1411–1431
  6. Paiano, A., and Lagioia, G. (2016). Energy potential from residual biomass towards meeting the EU renewable energy and climate targets. The Italian case. Energy Policy. 91:161–173
  7. Filipović, D., & Krička, T. (2006). An Energy Analysis of Rapeseed Production for Biodiesel in Croatia. Strojniški vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 52(10), 680
  8. Sürmen, Y. (2003). The Necessity of Biomass Energy for the Turkish Economy. Energy Sources. 25: 83–92
  9. Demirbas, A. (2006). Sustainable Biomass Production. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 28:955–964
  10. Demirbas, A. (2006). Biomass Gasification for Power Generation in Turkey. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 28:433–445
  11. Yelmen, B., and Çakir, M. T. (2016). Biomass potential of Turkey and energy production applications. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy. 11:428–435
  12. Saracoglu, N. (2010). The Biomass Potential of Turkey for Energy Production: Part I. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy. 5:272–278
  13. Avcioğlu, A. O., and Türker, U. (2012). Status and potential of biogas energy from animal wastes in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16:1557–1561
  14. Balat, M., Acici, N., and Ersoy G. (2006). Trends in the Use of Biomass as an Energy Source. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy. 1:367–378
  15. Erdogdu, E. (2008). An expose´ of bioenergy and its potential and utilization in Turkey. Energy