Dergiler / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the Periodic Examination of Physicians Working in a Training and Research Hospital Regarding Malignancy Risk

Sayfa
16–20
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Discussion and Conclusion: When PHE files are analyzed regarding risk factors that may be involved in the etiology of malignancy in the literature, it is concluded that physicians have positive results according to the data of the world and our country

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: Employee health was assured by regulation no. 27897 on 6 April 2011, in our country, Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Periodic health examination (PHE) files of 227 physicians working in Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital between 01.06.2018-31.12.2018 were examined in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Discussion and Conclusion: When PHE files are analyzed regarding risk factors that may be involved in the etiology of malignancy in the literature, it is concluded that physicians have positive results according to the data of the world and our country
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Introduction: Employee health was assured by regulation no. 27897 on 6 April 2011, in our country, Turkey. Health workers are periodically examined and controlled according to the risk in their duties. In this study, we aimed to analyze periodic examinations of physicians working in an educational research hospital and determine the findings that may pose a risk for malignant diseases. Methods: Periodic health examination (PHE) files of 227 physicians working in Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital between 01.06.2018-31.12.2018 were examined in this study. Results: The files of 227 physicians who gave consent for the periodic examination were studied. Of the 221 physicians whose data were complete, 125 were female (56.6%), and 96 were male (43.4%). When smoking was questioned regarding the etiology of malignancy, the number of physicians smoking was 32 (14.1%), and no statistically significant difference was found between the genders. When another risk factor obesity rates were examined, 20.7% were overweighed (n: 47), 3.5% were obese (n: 8), and 0.4% were morbidly obese (n: 1). Male physicians were more likely to be overweighed or obese, and the difference was statistically significant compared to women. The rates of other findings that may be risk factors were much lower. Discussion and Conclusion: When PHE files are analyzed regarding risk factors that may be involved in the etiology of malignancy in the literature, it is concluded that physicians have positive results according to the data of the world and our country

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZKAYA, H., KOBAN, B. U., YILDIZ, M. M., KAŞÇATAN, S., GÖNENÇ, I., EGİCİ, M. T. (2020). Evaluation of the Periodic Examination of Physicians Working in a Training and Research Hospital Regarding Malignancy Risk. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 1, 16–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/200276

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. WHO. The top 10 causes of death 2018, https://www.who.int/ news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death, erişim tarihi: 05.08.2019
  2. WHO. Cancer Tomorow 2019 04.08.2019. Available from:
  3. TÜİK. Ölüm Nedeni İstatistikleri 2018, http://tuik.gov.tr/ PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=30626, erişim tarihi: 07.08.2019
  4. Stein CJ, Colditz GA. Modifiable risk factors for cancer. Br J Cancer 2004;90:299–303
  5. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı. Hasta ve Çalışan Güvenliğinin Sağlanmasına Dair Yönetmelik 2011, https://dosyamerkez.saglik. gov.tr/Eklenti/3628,hastavecalisanguvenligininsaglanmasinadairyonetmelikpdf.pdf?0, erişim tarihi: 07.08.2019
  6. Wiskar K, BSc. Physician health: A review of lifestyle behaviors and preventive health care among physicians. BC Med J 2012;54:419–23
  7. George S, Hanson J, Jackson JL. Physician, heal thyself: a qualitative study of physician health behaviors. Acad Psychiatry 2014;38:19–25
  8. McClafferty H, Brown OW; Section on Integrative Medicine; Committee on Practice And Ambulatory Medicine; Section on Integrative Medicine. Physician health and wellness. Pediatrics 2014;134:830–5
  9. Schrijver I. Pathology in the medical profession?: Taking the pulse of physician wellness and burnout. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;140:976–82
  10. TÜİK. Türkiye Sağlık Araştırması, 2016, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24573, erişim tarihi: 30.09.2019
  11. Koç EM, Başer D, Döner P, Yılmaz T, Yılmaz T, Alsancak A, et al. Determining smoking level of hospital employees and the evaluation of the smoke-free air zone applications. J Clin Exp Invest 2015;6:33–9
  12. Saglam L, Bayraktar R, Kadioglu EE, Acemoglu H. Smoking prevalance and the degree of nicotine dependence among healthcare workers at the ataturk university medical facility. Eurasian J Med 2010;42:74–7
  13. Jankowski M, Kaleta D, Zgliczyński WS, Grudziąż-Sękowska J, Wrześniewska-Wal I, Gujski M, et al. Cigarette and e-cigarette use and smoking cessation practices among physicians in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16. pii: E3595
  14. Eldein HN, Mansour NM, Mohamed SF. Knowledge, attitude and practice of family physicians regarding smoking cessation counseling in family practice centers, Suez Canal university, Egypt. J Family Med Prim Care 2013;2:159–63
  15. Pipe A, Sorensen M, Reid R. Physician smoking status, attitudes toward smoking, and cessation advice to patients: An international survey. Patient Educ Couns 2009;74:118–23
  16. Malik