KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR ONE LEVEL SPINAL STENOSIS: UNILATERAL APPROACH BILATERAL MICRODECOMPRESSION

Şahin YÜCELİ
Sayfa
189–192
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: Unilateral approach with bilateral microdecompression for treating one level lumbar spinal stenosis could be an alternative treatment for instrumentation at selected patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of our study is to investigate the effectiveness rate of minimal invasive surgery approach in one level lumbar spinal stenosis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: Pain scores were evaluated before surgery and at postoperative 1 month follow up.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: Unilateral approach with bilateral microdecompression for treating one level lumbar spinal stenosis could be an alternative treatment for instrumentation at selected patients.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The aim of our study is to investigate the effectiveness rate of minimal invasive surgery approach in one level lumbar spinal stenosis. Materials and Method: Thirty-six patients were observed retrospectively. All patients have back and/or leg pain with neurogenic claudication. The patients were scored by visual analog scale with zero to ten; that zero is no pain and ten is the worst. Unilateral approach with bilateral microdecompression was used as the minimally invasive surgery technique for all patients with one level spinal stenosis. Results: Pain scores were evaluated before surgery and at postoperative 1 month follow up. The pain release rate was 88 %. Conclusions: Unilateral approach with bilateral microdecompression for treating one level lumbar spinal stenosis could be an alternative treatment for instrumentation at selected patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YÜCELİ, Ş. (2018). MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR ONE LEVEL SPINAL STENOSIS: UNILATERAL APPROACH BILATERAL MICRODECOMPRESSION. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 189–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/199284

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdel- noor M, Lilleâs F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 2000; 25: 1424–1436.
  2. Briggs H, Krause J. The intervertebral foraminotomy for relief of sciatic pain. J Bone Joint Surg 1945; 27-A: 475-478.
  3. Choi WS, Oh CH, Ji GY, Shin SC, Lee JB, Park DH, Cho TH. Spinal canal morphology and clinical outcomes of microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2014; 23: 991-998.
  4. Choy DS, Case RE, Fielding W. Percutaneous laser nu- cleolysis of lumbar disks. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 771. Ciol MA, Deyo RA, Howell E, Kreif S. An assessment ofsurgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 285–290. den Boogert HF, Keers JC, Marinus Oterdoom DL, Kui- jlen JM. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter ret- rospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction. J Neurosurg Spine 2015; 23(3): 326-335.
  5. Dirksmeier P, Parsons IM, Kang J. Microendoscopic and open laminotomy and discectomy in lumbar disc disease. Semin Spine Surg 1999; 11: 138-146.
  6. Fu YS, Zeng BF, Xu JG. Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2008; 33: 514-518.
  7. Kambin P, O‘Brien E, Zhou L, Schaffer JL. Arthroscop- ic microdiscectomy and selective fragmentectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 347: 150-167.
  8. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J 2009; 9: 545-550.
  9. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, Levine SA, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1996; 21: 92-98.
  10. Kleeman TJ, Hiscoe AC, Berg EE. Patient outcomes after minimally destabilizing lumbar stenosis decom- pression: the “Port-Hole” technique. Spine 2000; 25: 865-870.
  11. Kim HS, Patel R, Paudel B, Jang JS, Jang IT, Oh SH, Park JE, Lee S. Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Con- tralateral Foraminal and Lateral Recess Decompression via an Interlaminar Approach in Patients with Unilat- eral Radiculopathy from Unilateral Foraminal Stenosis. World Neurosurg 2017; 108: 763-773.
  12. Lyons JB, Rose F. Sir Victor Horsley (1857e1916) revi