Dergiler / Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

CONTROLLER TUNING APPROACH WITH TLBO ALGORITHM FOR THE AUTOMATIC VOLTAGE REGULATOR SYSTEM

Sayfa
128–146
Yayın Tarihi
2020-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results obtained with the proposed controllers show a better trade-off between the set point tracking performance, robustness and stability.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this paper, an optimal parameter set tuning method for proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller and fractional order PID controller is proposed using teaching-learning based optimization (TLBO) algorithm.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The performances of the proposed controllers are confirmed by comparing their results with those obtained from different optimized PID and FOPID controllers previously published in the literature for the same AVR system.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results obtained with the proposed controllers show a better trade-off between the set point tracking performance, robustness and stability.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:AVR system · TLBO Algorithm · PID control

Abstract

In this paper, an optimal parameter set tuning method for proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller and fractional order PID controller is proposed using teaching-learning based optimization (TLBO) algorithm. During the optimization of the PID and FOPID controller parameters, an objective function consisting of overshoot, rise time, settling time and steady state error is formulated to achieve a satisfactory trade-off between the dynamic response characteristics. TLBO algorithm is used as the optimizer to find the best parameters of the proposed controllers. The designed PID and FOPID controllers are applied to an automatic voltage regulator (AVR) system. The performances of the proposed controllers are confirmed by comparing their results with those obtained from different optimized PID and FOPID controllers previously published in the literature for the same AVR system. The numerical simulations and comparisons show that the proposed controllers provide the better dynamic response characteristics as well as more robust to model uncertainties than the other different optimized controllers. The results obtained with the proposed controllers show a better trade-off between the set point tracking performance, robustness and stability.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYYILDIZ, B. A., KARAHAN, O. (2020). CONTROLLER TUNING APPROACH WITH TLBO ALGORITHM FOR THE AUTOMATIC VOLTAGE REGULATOR SYSTEM. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 128–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/196570

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Wong C-C, Li S-A, Wang H-Y. Hybrid evolutionary algorithm for PID controller design of AVR system, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 2009; 32 (2): 251-264. Gaing Z-L. A particle swarm optimization approach for optimum design of PID controller in AVR system, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2004; 19 (2): 384-391.
  2. Mohanty P-K, Sahu B-K, Panda S. Tuning and assessment of proportional–integral– derivative controller for an automatic voltage regulator system employing local unimodal sampling algorithm, Electr. Power Compon. Syst., 2014; 42 (9): 959-969.
  3. Zhu H, Li L, Zhao Y, Guo Y, Yang Y. CAS algorithm-based optimum design of PID controller in AVR system, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 2009; 42 (2): 792-800.
  4. Panda S, Sahu B-K, Mohanty P-K. Design and performance analysis of PID controller for an automatic voltage regulator system using simplified particle swarm optimization, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2012; 349 (8): 2609-2625.
  5. Gozde H, Taplamacioglu M C. Comparative performance analysis of artificial bee colony algorithm for automatic voltage regulator (AVR) system, J. Frankl. Inst., 2011; 348: 1927-1946. Kim D H. Hybrid GA–BF based intelligent PID controller tuning for AVR system, Applied Soft Computing, 2011; 11 (1); 11-22.
  6. Chatterjee S, Mukherjee V. PID controller for automatic voltage regulator using teaching–learning based optimization technique, Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2016; 77: 418-429.
  7. Blondin M J, Sanchis J, Sicard P, Herrero J M. New optimal controller tuning method for an AVR system using a simplified ant colony optimization with a new constrained Nelder–Mead algorithm, Appl. Soft Comput., 2018; 62: 216-229. Mouayad A S. A novel optimal PID plus second order derivative controller for AVR system, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 2015; 18 (2): 194-206,
  8. Bingul Z, Karahan O. A novel performance criterion approach to optimum design of PID controller using cuckoo search algorithm for AVR system, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2018; 355 (13): 5534-5559. Podlubny I. Fractional-order systems and PI^λ D^μ controllers, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1999; 44 (1): 208-2014.
  9. Zamani M, Karimi-Ghartemani M, Sadati N, Parniani M. Design of a fractional order PID controller for an AVR using particle swarm optimization, Control Engineering Practice, 2009; 17 (12): 1380-1387.
  10. Tang Y, Cui M, Hua C, Li L, Yang Y. Optimum design of fractional order PI^λ D^μ controller for AVR system using chaotic ant swarm, Expert S