KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Central Bank Review / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Job search, occupational choice and learning

Tayyar BÜYÜKBAŞARAN
Sayfa
85–97
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Theory can also be used to (4) explain the discouraged workerphenomenon/

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper investigates the labor market consequences of incomplete information about workers’ownjob searching process and best occupationsfitting to them.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Particularly, ourcharacterization gives rational for why workers with less experience in searching have (1) longer un-employment duration and (2) higher probability of changing occupation by reemployment, and (3) whyshifts in Beveridge curve may be observed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Theory can also be used to (4) explain the discouraged workerphenomenon/
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This paper investigates the labor market consequences of incomplete information about workers’ownjob searching process and best occupationsfitting to them. A search and learning model is provided inorder to analyze these effects. In the model, search outcomes relay information about workers’jobfinding abilities and appropriate occupations suited to them, and workers use this information to infertheir types. Our theory explains how search outcomes during unemployment can change the beliefs ofworkers about their jobfinding ability and consequently affect their decisions including the occupationalchoices. Characterization of the model results in a simple value function withreservation level of priorbelief propertythat is similar to reservation wage property. Some interesting facts about both micro andmacro data are identified and our model’s explanation of these facts is discussed. Particularly, ourcharacterization gives rational for why workers with less experience in searching have (1) longer un-employment duration and (2) higher probability of changing occupation by reemployment, and (3) whyshifts in Beveridge curve may be observed. Theory can also be used to (4) explain the discouraged workerphenomenon/

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BÜYÜKBAŞARAN, T. (2020). Job search, occupational choice and learning. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 85–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/194958

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Acemoglu, D., Shimer, R.,1999. Efficient unemployment insurance. J. Polit. Econ. 107,893-928.
  2. Burdett, K., Vishwanath, T., 1988. Declining ReservationWages and Learning. Rev.Econ. Stud. vol. 55, 655-665.
  3. Bikhchandani, S., Sharma, S., 1996. Optimal search with learning. J. Econ. Dynam.Contr. 20, 333-359.
  4. Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., 2006. Do I have what it takes? Equilibrium Searchwith Type Uncertainty and Non-participation,”Working Paper. IZA DP 2531. Gonzalez, F.M., Shi, S., 2010. An equilibrium theory of learning, search and wages.Econometrica 78, 509-537.
  5. Jovanovic, B., 1979. Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Polit. Econ. 87, 972-990.
  6. Kambourov, G., Manovskii, I., 2013. Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Polit.Econ. 117, 914-940.
  7. Kroft, K., Lange, F., Notowidigdo, M.J., 2013. Duration dependence and labor marketconditions: evidence from afield experiment. Q. J. Econ. 128 (3), 1123-1167.
  8. Lazear, E.P., 2009. Firm-specific human capital: a skill-weights approach. J. Polit.Econ. 117, 914-940.
  9. Menzio, G., Shi, S., 2010. Block recursive equilibria for stochastic models of searchon the job. J. Econ. Theor. 145 (4), 1453-1494.
  10. Moscarini, G., Postel-Vinay, F., 2013. Stochastic search equilibrium. Rev. Econ. Stud.80 (4), 1545-1581.
  11. Nyarko, Y., 1994. On the convexity of the value function in bayesian optimal controlproblems. Econ. Theor. 4, 303-309.
  12. Papageorgiou, T., 2014. Learning your comparative advantages. Rev. Econ. Stud. 81(3), 1263-1295.
  13. Rogerson, R., Shimer, R., Wright, R., 2005. Search theoretic models of the labormarket: a survey. J. Econ. Lit. XLIII, 959-988.
  14. Stokey, N., Lucas, R.E., Prescott, E., 1989. Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics.Harvard University Press,”Cambridge, MA.