Dergiler / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Culture and PCR for Detection of Field Isolates of Bovine Milk Mollicutes

Sayfa
337–342
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The PCR system used in this study showed significant rapidity and sensitivity compared to the conventional bacteriological culture method for screening Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma species in dairy herds.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Mycoplasma mastitis raises significant concerns in the dairy industry worldwide.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study objective was to develop an accurate and rapid screening method for identification of field isolates of Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma species and investigate relative merits of conventional microbial culture versus PCR-based method for detecting Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma species in bovine milk.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The PCR system used in this study showed significant rapidity and sensitivity compared to the conventional bacteriological culture method for screening Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma species in dairy herds.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Mycoplasma mastitis raises significant concerns in the dairy industry worldwide. The study objective was to develop an accurate and rapid screening method for identification of field isolates of Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma species and investigate relative merits of conventional microbial culture versus PCR-based method for detecting Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma species in bovine milk. A total of 368 milk samples collected at individual cow level from a single dairy farm in South Australia, 192 (52%) tested positive for mollicutes using a conventional culturebased method. DNA extracted directly from milk and used for amplification through specifically designed universal mollicutes PCR-based method. Of them, 269 (73%) tested positive. Sequencing results of 30 positive samples targeting the 16S rRNA gene, showed five different mollicutes species involved, including Acholeplasma laidlawii, Acholeplasma axanthum, Mycoplasma arginini, Mycoplasma bovirhinis, Mycoplasma bovis. According to these results, species-specific PCR was conducted on all samples. DNA amplifications using species-specific PCR yielded 256 (70%) positive mollicutes samples. The developed universal PCR demonstrated best concordance with species-specific PCR (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.747±0.031). Co-infection by two or more of the above-mentioned mollicutes showed highest prevalence. It is recommended surveying mollicutes using the universal PCR used in this study. The PCR system used in this study showed significant rapidity and sensitivity compared to the conventional bacteriological culture method for screening Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma species in dairy herds.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

FARHA, A. A., HEMMATZADEH, F., TEARLE, R., JOZANI, R., HOARE, A., PETROVSKI, K. (2020). Comparison of Culture and PCR for Detection of Field Isolates of Bovine Milk Mollicutes. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 337–342. https://ajindex.com/articles/194469

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Pfutzner H, Sachse K: Mycoplasma bovis as an agent of mastitis, pneumonia, arthritis and genital disorders in cattle. Rev Sci Tech, 15 (4): 1477-1494, 1996. DOI: 10.20506/rst.15.4.987 2. Sulyok K, Kreizinger Z, Wehmann E, Lysnyansky I, Bányai K, Marton S, Jerzsele Á, Rónai Z, Turcsányi I, Makrai L, Jánosi S, Nagy S, Gyuranecz M: Mutations associated with decreased susceptibility to seven antimicrobial families in field and laboratory-derived Mycoplasma bovis strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 61 (2): e01983-16. 2017. DOI: 10.1128/aac.01983-16:AAC.01983-16 3. Lysnyansky I, Ayling RD: Mycoplasma bovis: Mechanisms of resistance and trends in antimicrobial susceptibility. Front Microbiol, 7:595, 2016. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00595 4. González RN, Wilson DJ: Mycoplasmal mastitis in dairy herds. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 19 (1): 199-221, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0749- 0720(02)00076-2 5. Fox LK, Kirk JH, Britten A: Mycoplasma mastitis: A review of transmission and control. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health, 52 (4): 153-160, 2005. 6. George L, Divers T, Ducharme N, Welcome F: Diseases of the Teats and Udder. In, Rebhun’s Diseases of Dairy Cattle. 2nd ed., Elsevier Health Sciences, 2007. 7. Boonyayatra S, Fox Lk, Gay J, Sawant A, Besser T: Discrimination between Mycoplasma and Acholeplasma species of bovine origin using digitonin disc diffusion assay, nisin disc diffusion assay, and conventional polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Diagn Invest, 24 (1): 7-13, 2011. DOI: 10.1177/1040638711425936 8. Jasper D, Dellinger J, Rollins M, Hakanson H: Prevalence of mycoplasmal bovine mastitis in California. Am J Vet Res, 40, 1043-1047, 1979. 9. Al-Farha A, Hemmatzadeh F, Khazandi M, Hoare A, Petrovski K: Evaluation of effects of Mycoplasma mastitis on milk composition in dairy cattle from South Australia. BMC Vet Res, 13:351, 2017. DOI: 10.1186/ s12917-017-1274-2 10. Windsor HM, Windsor GD, Noordergraaf JH: The growth and long term survival of Acholeplasma laidlawii in media products used in biopharmaceutical manufacturing. Biologicals, 38 (2): 204-210, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2009.11.009 11. Kirk J, Glenn K, Ruiz L, Smith E: Epidemiologic analysis of Mycoplasma spp. isolated from bulk-tank milk samples obtained from dairy herds that were members of a milk cooperative. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 211, 1036-1038, 1997. 12. Hotzel H, Frey J, Bashiruddin J, Sachse K: Detection and differentiation of ruminant mycoplasmas. In, Sachse K, Frey J (Eds): PCR Detection