Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON AUTOLOGOUS CERVICAL INTERBODY FAT GRAFT APPLICATION FOR ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMIES

Sayfa
69–72
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Contralateral approach provides better visualization.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: This retrospectively designed study investigates the relation between clinical and radiological results of patients who were performed ACD and autologous interbody fat graft.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and Methods: A total of 71 patients who underwent ACD with IFG in Neurosurgery Clinics of Şişli Etfal EAH between 1994 and 2009 were included in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Contralateral approach provides better visualization.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background: This retrospectively designed study investigates the relation between clinical and radiological results of patients who were performed ACD and autologous interbody fat graft. Material and Methods: A total of 71 patients who underwent ACD with IFG in Neurosurgery Clinics of Şişli Etfal EAH between 1994 and 2009 were included in this study. Patients age range was between 28 and 56 years with the mean of 41,08±6,67. Patient population was composed of 25 women and 46 men. All the operations were performed by the senior authors (YA). The surgery was applied to 1 or 2 level soft cervical disc herniations. Selected patients have one of the following criteria: 1. Radicular signs as motor weakness, dermatomal numbness etc., 2. Long tract signs, and 3. Refractory or persistent pain to minimum 3 weeks medical treatment. Harrison’s posterior tangent method used for ROM measurement on dynamic roentgenograms. Segmental ROM was measured by the same method at the operated vertebral level. Pain and functional evaluation: Neck Disability Index (NDI) (2) and Short Form 36 (SF- 36) (3) were used for functional and pain status of the patients. Results: Segmental and cervical total lordosis angles are not change statistically after operation. Radiologically detected fusion or developing kyphotic deformity is not seen. ROM levels changed significantly in long-term period. NDI scores decreased significantly early and late period. SF-36 results are increased significantly in long-term follow-up. Conclusions: Microsurgical technique and autologous interbody fat graft may prevent complication of fusion such as adjacent segment degeneration. Contralateral approach provides better visualization.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TUNCER, C., AYDIN, Y. (2019). A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON AUTOLOGOUS CERVICAL INTERBODY FAT GRAFT APPLICATION FOR ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMIES. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 69–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/192857

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Abd-Alrahman N, Dokmak AS, Abou-Madawi A. Anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) versus anterior cervical fusion (ACF), clinical and radiological outcome study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141(10): 1089-1092.
  2. Aydın Y, Kaya RA, Can SM, Türkmenoğlu O, Çavuşoğlu H, Ziyal İM. Minimally invasive anterior contralateral approach for the treatment of cervical disc herniation. Surg Neurol 2005; 63(3): 210-218.
  3. Aydın Y, Çavuşoğlu H, Yüce İ, Özdilmaç A, Kahyaoğlu O. A prospective study of interbody fat graft application with the anterior contralateral cervical microdiscectomy to preserve segmental mobility. Neurosurgery 2017; 81(4): 627-637.
  4. Bridwell KH, DeWald RL (Ed). Textbook of spinal surgery, 2nd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia 1997.
  5. Cauthen JC, Kinard RE, Vogler JB, Jackson DE, DePaz OB, Hunter OL, Wasserburger LB, Williams RN. Outcome analysis of noninstrumented anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion in 348 patients. Spine 1998; 23: 188-192. Cloward RB. New method for diagnosis and treatment of cervical disc disease. Clin Neurosurg 1962; 8: 93-132.
  6. Conolly ES, Esses SI, Kostuik JP. Anterior cervical fusion: outcome analysis of patients fused with and without anterior cervical plates. J Spinal Disord 1996; 9: 202-206. Cuatico W. Anterior cervical discectomy without interbody fusion. An analysis of 81 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1981; 57: 269-274.
  7. Çavuşoğlu H, Türkmenoğlu O, Kaya RA, Can SM, Aydın Y. Effects of anterior contralateral cervical microdiscectomy on radiological and clinical outcome. Surg Neurol 2006; 65(5): 446-452.
  8. Çavuşoğlu H, Tuncer C, Tanık C, Mutlu Z, Zengin E, Karabağlı M, Aydın Y. The impact of automatic retractors on the esophagus during during anterioe cervical surgery. An experimental in vivo study in a sheep model. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11: 547-554.
  9. Dowd GC, Wirth PF. Anterior discectomy: Is fusion necessary? J Neurosurg Spine 1999; 90: 8-12.
  10. Goffin J, Van Calenberg F, Van Loon J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, Sgrambiglia R, Pointillard V. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 2003; 28(24): 2673-2678. Grob D. Surgery in the degenerative cervical spine. Spine 1998; 23: 2674-2683.
  11. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis? Spine 2000; 25: 2072- 2078.
  12. Henderson CM, Henessy RG, Shuey HM, Shuckleford EG. Poster