KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

SAGITTAL SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS IN THE YOUNG ADULT TURKISH POPULATION

Mehmet KÜRŞAD BAYRAKTAR
Sayfa
1–4
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The PI was found to be lower while LL was the same compared to the current literature from other countries and further studies were needed to clarify.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: A radiological analysis of the spinopelvic paramaters and sagittal balance in a young adult Turkish population.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The unpaired t-test was used for comparison of measurements of genders. p<0.05 considered as statistically significant.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The PI was found to be lower while LL was the same compared to the current literature from other countries and further studies were needed to clarify.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: A radiological analysis of the spinopelvic paramaters and sagittal balance in a young adult Turkish population. Method: From radiology archive, full lateral spinal radiographs were scanned. The individuals who had no diagnosed of structural spine abnormality and no sign about spinal disorder from medical records were measured by Surgimap software on digital radiography. Sagittal spinal parameters (SVA, TK, LL) and Spinopelvic parameters (PI, PT) were measured. The unpaired t-test was used for comparison of measurements of genders. p<0.05 considered as statistically significant. Results: A total of 860 full lateral spine radiographs in the database were assessed and finally, 126 individuals (72 female, and 54 male) were included in the study who met all the criteria. The mean age was 27.4 ± 6.88 (range 20-40). The mean sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT) were -46.9 mm ± 19.83, 35.5° ± 5.47, 57.8° ± 9.10, 47.4 ± 9,13, and 13.37 ± 7.32, respectively. The PI (p=0.012), and TK (p=0.010) values between females and males were statistically significant, but SVA (p= 0.26), PT (p= 0.32), and LL (p=0.43) were not. Conclusion: This study was yielded to determine normative values of spinopelvic parameters in young adult Turkish population that would assist the clinical practice of spinal surgeons. The PI was found to be lower while LL was the same compared to the current literature from other countries and further studies were needed to clarify.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYRAKTAR, M. K. (2019). SAGITTAL SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS IN THE YOUNG ADULT TURKISH POPULATION. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 1–4. https://ajindex.com/articles/192851

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Asai Y, Tsutsui S, Oka H, Yoshimura N, Hashizume H, Yamada H, Akune T, Muraki S, Matsudaira K, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Tanaka S, Yoshida M. Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in adults: the Wakayama spine study. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0178697. Endo K, Suzuki H, Nishimura H, Tanaka H, Shishido T, Yamamoto K. Characteristics of sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in Japanese young adults. Asian Spine J 2014; 8: 599-604.
  2. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 1995; 20: 1351-1358.
  3. Gilsanz V, Skaggs DL, Kovanlikaya A, Sayre J, Loro ML, Kaufman F, Korenman SG. Differential effect of race on the axial and appendicular skeletons of children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83: 1420–1427.
  4. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 2005; 30: 2024–2029.
  5. Jackson RP, Hales C. Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine 2000; 25: 2808-2832.
  6. Janssen MM, Drevelle X, Humbert L, Skalli W, Castelein RM. Differences in male and female spino-pelvic alignment in asymptomatic young adults: a three-dimensional analysis using upright low-dose digital biplanar X-rays. Spine 2009; 34: E826–E832. Lee CS, Chung SS, Kang KC, Park SJ, Shin SK. Normal patterns of sagittal alignment of the spine in young adults radiological analysis in a Korean population. Spine 2011; 36: E1648-E654. Lonner BS, Auerbach JD, Sponseller P, Rajadhyaksha AD, Newton PO. Variations in pelvic and other sagittal spinal parameters as a function of race in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22: 551–558.
  7. Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P. Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 Suppl 5: 572–577.
  8. Marks MC, Stanford CF, Mahar AT, Newton PO. Standing lateral radiographic positioning does not represent customary standing balance. Spine 2003; 28: 1176-1182.
  9. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 2010; 35: 2224-2231.
  10. Sevinc O, Iş M, Barut C, Ozdemir ST, Ayoglu FN. Sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine in a Turkish population. Neurosciences 2007; 12(3): 221-225.
  11. Tonbul M, G