Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6

Driving factors affecting the phytoplankton functional groups in a deep alkaline lake

Sayfa
633–646
Yayın Tarihi
2020-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, the approach of PFGs can be successfully applied in a deep, alkaline lake to understand the water quality and trophic status.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study evaluated the phytoplankton communities based on functional groups to obtain information about the water quality of Lake İznik, Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The phytoplankton consisted of 103 taxa, classified in 12 phytoplankton functional groups (PFGs), with dominancy of 5 species, Chrysosporum ovalisporum, Dolichospermum mendotae, Planktothrix rubescens, Fragilaria capucina, and Mougeotia sp.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, the approach of PFGs can be successfully applied in a deep, alkaline lake to understand the water quality and trophic status.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Phytoplankton functional groups · Lake İznik · Turkey

Abstract

This study evaluated the phytoplankton communities based on functional groups to obtain information about the water quality of Lake İznik, Turkey. The phytoplankton consisted of 103 taxa, classified in 12 phytoplankton functional groups (PFGs), with dominancy of 5 species, Chrysosporum ovalisporum, Dolichospermum mendotae, Planktothrix rubescens, Fragilaria capucina, and Mougeotia sp. The Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H’) was calculated and results ranged between 0.41 and 2.47. The redundancy analysis (RDA) and Spearman’s correlation analysis were used to assess the relationships between the PFGs and environmental variables. According to the multiple comparisons of the data, the main efficient factors that determined the seasonal distribution of the PFGs were TP, DO, SiO2, SD, and pH. The ecological requirements of the dominant PFGs (C, D, F, J, H1, Lo, SN, N, P, R, T, and X2) indicated mainly meso-eutrophic waters. Similarly, Carlson’s trophic state index (TSI) stated mesotrophy conditions. As a result, the approach of PFGs can be successfully applied in a deep, alkaline lake to understand the water quality and trophic status.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OGUZ, A., AKCAALAN, R., KOKER, L., GUREVİN, C., DORAK, Z., ALBAY, M. (2020). Driving factors affecting the phytoplankton functional groups in a deep alkaline lake. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 6, 633–646. https://ajindex.com/articles/192710

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Akcaalan R, 2014,
  2. TOXINS, V6, P3173, DOI 10.3390/toxins6113173 Akcaalan R, 2014, TURK J BOT, V38, P782, DOI 10.3906/bot-1401-26 Aktan Y, 2001, U URUN DERG, V12, P31. Albay M, 2003,
  3. HYDROBIOLOGIA, V502, P85, DOI 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000004272.38702.c3 Albay M, 1996, INVESTIGATION POLLUT. Albay Meric, 2002, Su Urunleri Dergisi, V19, P247 [Anonymous], 1992, 10260 ISO. APHA, 1989, STANDARD METHODS EXA, P113. Atici T, 2012, TURK J FISH AQUAT SC, V12, P595, DOI 10.4194/1303-2712-v12_3_06 Briand JF, 2004, J PHYCOL, V40, P231, DOI 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2004.03118.x Carlson R.E., 1992, P NAT C ENH STAT LAK, P59 CARLSON RE, 1977, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V22, P361, DOI 10.4319/lo.1977.22.2.0361 Carvalho L, 2011, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V409, P5353, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.030 Celekli A, 2014,
  4. HYDROBIOLOGIA, V740, P115, DOI 10.1007/s10750-014-1948-8 Celik K, 2015, TURK J BOT, V39, P588, DOI 10.3906/bot-1402-69 Commision Directive 2000/60/EC, 2000,
  5. OFFICIAL J EUROPEA L, VL327, P1 Demir AN, 2014, TURK J BOT, V38, P169, DOI 10.3906/bot-1301-60 Di Maggio J, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V165, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.027 Forti A, 1911, DIAGNOSES MYXOPHYCEA. Grime J. P., 1979, Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Hadas O, 2002, EUR J PHYCOL, V37, P259, DOI 10.1017/S0967026202003645 Havens KE, 2000, KOREAN J LIMNOL, V33, P187 Hillebrand H, 1999, J PHYCOL, V35, P403, DOI 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520403.x Hoyer AB, 2009,
  6. HYDROBIOLOGIA, V636, P49, DOI 10.1007/s10750-009-9934-2 John DM, 2005, FRESHWATER ALGA FLOR. Koker L, 2017, J ENVIRON PROT ECOL, V18, P425 Komarek J, 2007, CYANOPROKARYOTA 2. Korner C., 1994, BIODIVERSITY ECOSYST, P117 Krammer K., 1986, SUSSWASSERFLORA MITT, V2 1 Lenard T., 2009, TEKA KOMISJI OCHRONY, V6, P162 Lopez-Archilla AI, 2004,
  7. EXTREMOPHILES, V8, P109, DOI 10.1007/s00792-003-0369-9 Maraslioglu Faruk, 2014, Journal of Biological & Environmental Sciences, V8, P133 OECD, 1980, EUTR WAT MON ASS CON. Padisak J, 2003,
  8. HYDROBIOLOGIA, V502, P157, DOI 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000004278.10887.40 Padisak J, 2006,
  9. HYDROBIOLOGIA, V553, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10750-005-1393-9 Padisak J., 1997, ARCH HYDROBIOLOGY, V107, P563 Padisak J, 2009,
  10. HYDROBIOLOGIA, V621, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10750-008-9645-0 Pasztaleniec A, 2010,
  11. LIMNOLOGICA, V40, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.limno.2009.07.001 Petar Z, 2014,
  12. HYDROBIOLOGIA, V740, P147, DOI 10.1007/s10750-014-1950-1 PIELOU EC, 1966, J THEOR BIOL, V10, P370, DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90133-0 POLLI B, 1992, AQUAT SCI, V54, P303, DOI 10.1007/BF00878143