Dergiler / European Journal of Technique / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

ESTIMATING BASE STATION-BASED INDOOR AND OUTDOOR ELECTRIC FIELD LEVELS BY ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS

Sayfa
1–12
Yayın Tarihi
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The measured electric field values, estimated electric field values, and national standard values are compared.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The measurement of the electric field and the magnetic field is significant in order to determine electromagnetic pollution level compared to standards.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In Turkey, electric field limit value, which is emitted by base station is 13.5 V/m for one mobile communication operator.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The measured electric field values, estimated electric field values, and national standard values are compared.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Electromagnetic pollution · Electrical field · artificial neural network

Abstract

The measurement of the electric field and the magnetic field is significant in order to determine electromagnetic pollution level compared to standards. In Turkey, electric field limit value, which is emitted by base station is 13.5 V/m for one mobile communication operator. In addition, according to the regulation of medical devices, the limit of electric field value inside the hospital, where the medical devices are located, is 3 V/m. In this study, the measurement and evaluation of electromagnetic pollution inside and outside the Bursa Uludag University hospital building are performed and its compliance with national and international standards is examined. Moreover, the distribution of electric field in the environment is estimated by the artificial neural network and fuzzy logic methods considering the measurement results. The measured electric field values, estimated electric field values, and national standard values are compared.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARPAT, E., BAKCAN, M. R., CHABBAR, A. T., İBRAHİM, M. M. A., ÇELİK, B., DOĞAN, O. (2019). ESTIMATING BASE STATION-BASED INDOOR AND OUTDOOR ELECTRIC FIELD LEVELS BY ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. European Journal of Technique, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/191309

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. C. Kurnaz. An Empirical Modeling of Electromagnetic Pollution on a University Campus, ACES Express Journal, Vol. 1- 2, pp. 76-79, 2016
  2. C.Kurnaz, D. Yıldız, S. Karagol. Assessment Of Short/Long Term Electric Field Strength Measurements for a Pilot District, Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ISEF) Book of Abstracts, 18th International Symposium, 2017
  3. A. Mousa. Electromagnetic Radiation Measurements and Safety Issues of Some Cellular Base Stations in Nablus, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, Vol. 4-1, pp. 35-42, 2011
  4. ICNIRP Statement General Approach to Protection Against Non Ionizing Radiation, Health Physics 82(4):540-548, 2002
  5. Health and Electromagnetic Fields,
  6. ICTA Turkey Electromagnetic Exposure Standards,
  7. ICNIRP Guidelines, "Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300GHz)", International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, Health Physics vol.74, no.4, pp.494-522, 1998
  8. Mobile Communication Base Stations and Animal Health Risk Perception Among Swiss Veterinarians and Farmers, 10th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, 2003
  9. M. Ibrani, L. Ahma, E. Hamiti, J. Haxhibeqiri. Derivation of Electromagnetic Properties of Child Biological Tissues at Radio Frequencies, Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 25, 87-100, 2011
  10. P Elliott, M.B. Toledano, L. Beale, K. Hoogh, N. Best, D.J. Briggs. Mobile Phone Base Stations and Early Childhood Cancers: Case-Control Study, BMJ. Vol:22;340:c3077, 2010
  11. K. Lee, J. Yun. A Comparison of Specific Absorption Rates in SAM Phantom and Child Head Models at 835 and 1900 MHz, IEEE Transactıons On Electromagnetıc Compatıbılıty, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 619-627, 2011
  12. M. Ibrani, L. Ahma, E. Hamiti. Assessment of The Exposure of Children to Electromagnetic Fields from Wireless Communication Devices in Home Environments, IET Communications, Vol. 8-12, pp. 2222–2228, 2014
  13. J. Everaert, D. Bauwens. A Possible Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation from Mobile Phone Base Stations on the Number of Breeding House Sparrows (Passer domesticus), Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, Vol. 26, pp. 63–72, 2007
  14. U. Sorgucu, I. Develi. Measurement and Analysis of Electromagnetic Pollution Generated by GSM-900 Mobile Phone Networks in Erciyes University Turkey, E