Dergiler / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

The Comparison of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) with Other Breast MRI Parameters in the diagnosis of Breast Masses

Sayfa
271–275
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We believe that the ADC value can provide a higher diagnostic accuracy with the combination of morphological characteristics and contrast kinetics of the lesion and that ADC can be used alone because of its high diagnostic accuracy in some cases.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The breast MRI parameters such as morphologic features, enhancement kinetics and diffusion restriction can be used for the differential diagnosis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Between March 2014 and September 2017, 49 female patients in whom a breast mass was diagnosed, determined using ultrasound and mammography and who were further examined with MRI, were enrolled to this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We believe that the ADC value can provide a higher diagnostic accuracy with the combination of morphological characteristics and contrast kinetics of the lesion and that ADC can be used alone because of its high diagnostic accuracy in some cases.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The breast MRI parameters such as morphologic features, enhancement kinetics and diffusion restriction can be used for the differential diagnosis. We aimed to compare the Apperant Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values of masses with other MRI parameters in diagnosis of breast masses. Between March 2014 and September 2017, 49 female patients in whom a breast mass was diagnosed, determined using ultrasound and mammography and who were further examined with MRI, were enrolled to this study. Total 51 lesions were detected. Routine breast MRI protocol was performed and images were evaluated. The ADC cut-off value was taken as 1,1×10-3mm2 /s according to the literature. Fifty-one lesions were diagnosed with biopsy. Of these lesions, 23 (45.1%) were malignant (20 invasive ductal carcinoma and others) and 28 (54.9%) were benign (20 fibroadenomas and others). The accuracy rate of DCE assessment of MRI was 90,9% for benign lesions in with a type 1 curved lesions, and 81,8% for malign lesions in with a type 3 curved lesions. The accuracy rate of ADC values was 93,1% for benign lesions and 95,5% for malign lesions. We believe that the ADC value can provide a higher diagnostic accuracy with the combination of morphological characteristics and contrast kinetics of the lesion and that ADC can be used alone because of its high diagnostic accuracy in some cases.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OZGOKCE, M., HAVAN, N., CUCE, F., DURMAZ, F., SAKCI, Z. (2019). The Comparison of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) with Other Breast MRI Parameters in the diagnosis of Breast Masses. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 271–275. https://ajindex.com/articles/191086

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Palle L, Reddy B. Role of diffusion MRI in characterizing benign and malignant breast lesions. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2009; 19(4): 287-290
  2. Pereira FP, Martins G, Carvalhaes de Oliveira Rde V. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2011; 19(1): 95-11
  3. Sonmez G, Cuce F, Mutlu H, Incedayi M, Ozturk E, Sildiroglu O, Velioglu M, Bashekim CC, Kizilkaya E. Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation of benign and malign breast lesions.Wien Klin Wochenschr 2011; 123: 655-661
  4. Baltzer P.A, Bickel H, Spick, C, et al. Potential of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Characterization of Breast Lesions: Intraindividual Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Investigative radiology 2018; 53: 229- 235 5. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, et al. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 671-679
  5. Mann R.M, Mus RD, van Zelst J, Geppert C, Karssemeijer N, Platel B.A. novel approach to contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging for screening: high-resolution ultrafast dynamic imaging. Investigative radiology 2014; 49: 579-585
  6. ACR BI-RADS Atlas. American College of Radiology. 2013; 125-143, ISBN:155903016X 8. Bansal, R, Shah, V. & Aggarwal, B. Qualitative and quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast at 3T-A useful adjunct to contrastenhanced MRI in characterization of breast lesions.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging 2015; 25: 397-403
  7. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai Z. et al. H. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2002; 16: 172-178
  8. Mitsuhiro T. Interpretation of breast MRI: Correlation of kinetic and morphological parameters with pathological findings. Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences 2004; 3: 189- 1979
  9. Reiko W, Keiji M, Keiichi I, et al. ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. H. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 644-649
  10. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989; 171: 95-103
  11. Matsubayashi R.N, Fujii T, Yasumori K, Muranaka T, Momosaki S. Apparent diffusion coefficient in invasive ductal breast carcinoma: correlation with detailed histologic features and the enhancement ratio on dynamic contrastenhan