Dergiler / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Assessement of the complications of Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy-Guided Placement of Totally implantable venous access ports

Sayfa
15–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Low incidence of complications suggest ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided venous port implantation is a safe and reliable method for long-term venous access.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Totally implantable venous access systems are widely used in oncology; however, their complications are extremely common whic h, sometimes, require device removal, thereby, leading to delayed chemotherapy and infusion therapies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 219 consecutive cancer patients (111 males, 108 females; mean age: 56.9 years; range: 1 to 81 years) were retrospe ctively analyzed between January 2013 and June 2014.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Low incidence of complications suggest ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided venous port implantation is a safe and reliable method for long-term venous access.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Totally implantable venous access systems are widely used in oncology; however, their complications are extremely common whic h, sometimes, require device removal, thereby, leading to delayed chemotherapy and infusion therapies. In this study, we aimed t o investigate the immediate, early, and late complications of venous port implantation in our oncology patients. A total of 219 consecutive cancer patients (111 males, 108 females; mean age: 56.9 years; range: 1 to 81 years) were retrospe ctively analyzed between January 2013 and June 2014. A total of 220 ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided totally implantable venous port systems were implanted through the right or left internal jugular vein access. The mean follow-up was 83.7 (range: 2 to 410) days. Overall complication rate was 8.6% (19/220). Eight devices in seven patients were removed due to complications. Two ports were removed in one patient. The complications which required port removal were compromised port-related bloodstream infection (n=5), central venous thrombosis (n=3), and catheter thrombosis (n=1). No major complication or no mortality associated with the port implantation was seen during follow-up. Totally seven immediate complications including local hematoma (n=2), catheter tip retraction (n=2 ), pain (n=1), catheter loop formation (n=1), catheter malposition (n=1), two early complications (n=2; 1 wound dehiscence, and 1 wound infection), and 10 late complications including catheter-related blood stream infection (n=5), central venous thrombosis (n=3), catheter thrombosis (n=1), and tunnel hematoma (n=1) occurred. Low incidence of complications suggest ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided venous port implantation is a safe and reliable method for long-term venous access.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZKAÇMAZ, S., ALPASLAN, M., DADALI, Y., YAVUZ, A. (2019). Assessement of the complications of Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy-Guided Placement of Totally implantable venous access ports. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 15–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/190201

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Ignatov A, Hoffman O, Smith B, et al. An 11- year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: complications and patient satisfaction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35: 241-246.
  2. Zaghal A, Khalife M, Mukherji D, et al. Update on totally implantable venous access devices. Surg Oncol 2012; 21: 207-215.
  3. Plewa MC, Ledrick D, Sferra JJ. Delayed tension pneumothorax complicating central venous catheterization and positive pressure ventilation. Am J Emerg Med 1995; 13: 532- 535. Innami Y, Oyaizu T, Ouchi T, Umemura N, Koitabashi T. Life-threatening hemothorax resulting from right brachiocephalic vein perforation during right internal jugular vein catheterization. J Anesth 2009; 23: 135-138.
  4. Rutherford JS, Merry AF, Occleshaw CJ. Depth of central venous catheterization: an audit of practice in a cardiac surgical unit. Anaesth Intensive Care 1994; 22: 267-271.
  5. Gibson SP, Mosquera D. Five years experience with the Quinton Permcath for vascular access. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1991; 6: 269-274.
  6. Narducci F, Jean-Laurent M, Boulanger L, et al. Totally implantable venous access port systems and risk factors for complications: a one-year prospective study in a cancer centre. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011; 37: 913-918.
  7. Di Carlo Isidoro, Biffi Roberto. Totally implantable venous access devices management in mid- and long-term clinical setting. Springer, ISBN 978-88-470-2373-4; 2011.
  8. Dede D, Akmangit I, Yildirim ZN, Sanverdi E, Sayin B. Ultrasonography and fluoroscopyguided insertion of chest ports. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34: 1340-1343. Alexander RH. Vascular access and specialized techniques of drug delivery. In: De Vita VT, Helman S, Rosenberg SA, (Eds). Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1997; 725-734.
  9. Chena Chien-Yu, LiubChih-Chung, Sunb WeiZen. Evidence-based review on catheterrelated thrombosis of the implantable venous access device. Tzu ChiMedical Journal 2007;19(4):20719 Faraj W, Zaghal A, El-Beyrouthy O, Kutoubi A. Complete catheter disconnection and migration of an implantable venous Access device: the disconnected cap sign. Ann Vasc Surg 2010; 24: 11-15.
  10. Jones SA, Giacomantonio M. A complication associated with central line removal in the pediatric population: retained fixed catheter fragments. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 594-596.
  11. Nayeemuddin M, Pherwani AD, Asquith JR. Imaging and management of complications of central venous catheters. Clin Radiol 2013; 68: 529-544.
  12. Lai YC, Huang LJ, Chen TL, et al. Impact of Port-