KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Sayı: 24

REPRESENTING PRECARIOUSNESS: SIMON STEPHENS’S PORNOGRAPHY

Güven(ce)sizliğin Temsili: Simon Stephens’ın Pornography Adlı Oyunu

Mesut GÜNENÇ
Sayfa
333–344
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Within this context Simon Stephens’s is being studied in relation to the effects of terrorism, the war on terror, the concerns of certain lives and death, pessimistic vision of violence and face of the other.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In recent years, scholars, writers and critics have started to focus on the terms such as precariousness, precarization and precarity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:With its non-hierarchical seven scenes, numbered in descending order from seven to one, dependent, uncertain and untruthful characters are represented in Stephens’s play Pornography (2007).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Within this context Simon Stephens’s is being studied in relation to the effects of terrorism, the war on terror, the concerns of certain lives and death, pessimistic vision of violence and face of the other.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In recent years, scholars, writers and critics have started to focus on the terms such as precariousness, precarization and precarity. These terms traverse modern society and multiple contexts including industrial and social classes, family relations, politics, migration, otherness as well as interdependency, uncertainty, insecurity and hierarchization. With its non-hierarchical seven scenes, numbered in descending order from seven to one, dependent, uncertain and untruthful characters are represented in Stephens’s play Pornography (2007). Within this context Simon Stephens’s is being studied in relation to the effects of terrorism, the war on terror, the concerns of certain lives and death, pessimistic vision of violence and face of the other.

Abstract

Son yıllarda, akademisyenler, yazarlar ve eleştirmenler ‘tehlikeli durum/risklilik, tehlikeli olma ve güvencesizlik’ gibi kavramlar üzerine yoğunlaşmaya başladılar. Bu terimler çoklu bağlamda sanayileşmeden toplumsal sınıfları, aile ilişkilerini, siyaseti, göçü, içbağımlılık yanında ötekileşmeyi, belirsizliği, güvensizliği ve hiyerarşikleşmeyi içine alan çok yönlü kavramları ve modern toplumu dönüşüme uğratır. Yediden bire doğru gerileme gösteren düzende numaralandırılan, hiyerarşik yapıda olmayan yedi sahnesiyle, bağımlı, belirsiz ve güvenilir olamayan karakterler Stephens’ın Pornography (2007) oyununda yansıtılır. Bu bağlamda, terrorizmin, terrörle mücadelenin etkileri, yaşam ve ölüm koşullarının kaygıları, şiddetin ve öteki yüzün kötümser vizyonuyla bağlantılı olarak Simon Stephens’ın oyunu çalışılacaktır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNENÇ, M. (2019). REPRESENTING PRECARIOUSNESS: SIMON STEPHENS’S PORNOGRAPHY. Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 24, 333–344. https://ajindex.com/articles/190013

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Aragay, M. & Middeke, M. (Eds.). (2017). Of Precariousness: Vulnerabilities, responsibilities, communities in 21st –century British drama and theatre. CDE Studies, Walter de Gruyter: Berlin/Boston. Billington, M. (2009)
  2. Pornography, The Guardian. Accessed in http:// www.theguardian.com/stage/2009/aug/07/michaelbillington-Review. 20.03.2019.
  3. Bolton, J. (2013) Simon Stephens. in Dan Rebellato (Ed.). Modern British Playwriting: 2000-2009. London: Bloomsbury, 101-124.
  4. Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London and New York: Verso. Butler, J. (2012). Precarious life, vulnerability, and the ethics of cohabitation. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26.(2), 134-151.
  5. Cavareno, A. (2009). Horroism: Naming contemporary violence. William McCuaig(Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
  6. Derrida, J. & Dufourmantelle, A. (2000). Of hospitality. Rachel Bowlby (Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  7. Fragkou, M. (2012). Precarious subjects: Ethics of witnessing and responsibility in the plays of debbie tucker green. Performing Ethos, 3(1), 23-39.
  8. İlter, S. (2015). Rethinking play texts in the age of mediatization: Simon Stephens‘s pornography. Modern Drama, 58 (2), 238-262.
  9. Johnson, S. (1968). A dictionary of the English language. London: W. Strahan. Repr. Heidelberg: Olms, (1755). Lehmann, H. T. (2006). Postdramatic theatre. Karen Jürs-Munby (Trans.). London: Routledge. Levinas, E. (1989). Ethics as first philosophy. Karen Jürs-Munby (Trans.). London and New York: Routledge. Monforte, E. (2017). Staging terror and precariousness in Simon Stephens’s pornography and Mark Ravenhill’s shoot/get treasure/repeat in of precariousness. Vulnerabilities, Responsibilities, Communities in 21st – Century British Drama and Theatre. Mireia Aragay, Martin Middeke (Eds.), Berlin/Boston: CDE Studies, Walter de Gruyter, 31-45.
  10. Puar, J. (Eds.). (2012). Precarity talk: A virtual roundtable with Lauren Berlant, Judith Butler, Bojana Cvejic, Isabell Lorey, Jasbir Puar, and Ana Vujanovic. TDR: The Drama Review 56(4), 163-177.
  11. Ridout, N. (2009). Theatre & ethics. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Ridout, N. & Rebecca, S. (2012) Precarity and performance: An introduction. TDR: The Drama Review 56.4, 5-9.
  12. Stephens, S. (2009). Pornography. In Simon Stephens. Plays: 2 (One Minute, Country Music, Motortown, Pornography, Sea Wall). London: Methuen, 211-280.
  13. Thatcher, M. (1987). Interview for woman’s own. Thatcher Archive.