Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science / 2020 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

A priority-based queuing model approach using destination parameters for real-time applications on IPv6 networks

Sayfa
727–742
Yayın Tarihi
2020-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, the reduction in delay times between 22 and 39 ms resulted in various improvement rates between 16.79% and 35.13%.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In the early days of the Internet architecture, the most important aim is to transmit data over packet switched networks.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, today, as realtime applications increase, it is needed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, the reduction in delay times between 22 and 39 ms resulted in various improvement rates between 16.79% and 35.13%.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Quality of service · end-to-end delay · flow label

Abstract

In the early days of the Internet architecture, the most important aim is to transmit data over packet switched networks. The traditional Internet architecture used in these networks lacks quality of service. However, today, as realtime applications increase, it is needed. There are approaches to improving the quality of service using the flow label field in the Internet Protocol version 6 header. In this study, a novel algorithm that uses destination network parameters to reduce queuing and end-to-end delay is created. A round-robin-based time-aware priority queue new model is used within this algorithm. Data packets using this proposed queue are prioritized with metric values of the destination network. In order to provide end-to-end service quality, the prioritization value is used by placing it in the flow label field. For this purpose, a new approach to the use of this field is proposed. Delay, one of the most important factors affecting quality of service, is reduced with the proposed algorithm and flow label usage approach. As a result, the reduction in delay times between 22 and 39 ms resulted in various improvement rates between 16.79% and 35.13%.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİR, S., ÖZÇELİK, İ. (2020). A priority-based queuing model approach using destination parameters for real-time applications on IPv6 networks. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 727–742. https://ajindex.com/articles/186592

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Paul S, Pandit MK. A QoS-enhanced intelligent stochastic real-time packet scheduler for multimedia IP traffic. Multimedia Tools & Applications 2018; 77 (10): 12725-12748. doi: 10.1007/s11042-017-4912-6 [2] Çil A, Akar M, Anarım E. Adaptive optimization of EDCA parameters for improved QoS in multimedia applications. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 2012; 20 (2): 1369-1388. doi: 10.3906/elk-1102-1052 [3] Keagy S. Integrating Voice and Data Networks. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Cisco Press, 2000. [4] Luca R, Ciotirnae P, Popescu F. Influence of the QoS measures for VoIP traffic in a congested network. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control 2016; 11 (3): 405-413. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2014.10.017 [5] Pinto A, Polo S, Torres J, Macea M. Technology and business benefits of telecommunications infrastructure in frame relay based on the isp (internet service provideren). Ciencia E Ingenieria 2018; 39 (1): 3-12. [6] Hanif MK, Aamir SM, Talib R, Saeed Y. Analysis of network traffic congestion control over TCP protocol. International Journal Of Computer Science & Network Security 2017; 17 (7): 21-30. [7] Karakus M, Durresi A. An economic framework for analysis of network architectures: SDN and MPLS cases. Journal of Network & Computer Applications 2019; 136: 132-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2019.02.032 [8] Nasrallah A, Thyagaturu AS, Alharbi Z, Wang CX, Shao X et al. Ultra-low latency (ULL) networks: The IEEE TSN and IETF DetNet standards and related 5G ULL research. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 2018; 21 (1): 88-145. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2018.2869350 [9] Dumka A, Mandoria HL, Fore V, Dumka K. Implementation of QoS algorithm in integrated services (IntServ) MPLS network. In: INDIACom’15 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development; New Delhi, India; 2015. pp 1048-1050. [10] Xiao Y, Qu G, Kim K. A new DiffServ edge router with controlled-UDP. Chinese Journal of Electronics 2015; 24 (1): 176-180. doi:10.1049/cje.2015.01.029 [11] Garg R, Sharma S. Modified and improved IPv6 header compression (MIHC) scheme for 6LoWPAN. Wireless Personal Communications 2018; 103 (3): 2019-2033. doi:10.1007/s11277-018-5894-z [12] Sanchez LYB, Aguilar JJP. An approach to support traffic engineering in IPv6 networks based on IPv6 facilities. Telecommunication Systems 2019; 72 (1): 11-27. doi:10.1007/s11235-018-00543-7 [13] Hassan R, Jabbar R. End-to-end (e2e) quality of service (QoS) for IPv6 video stre